Finally, early in the 21st Century, NDP braves Opposition outrage to drag Alberta labour law into the late 20th Century

Posted on June 07, 2017, 1:44 am
7 mins

PHOTOS: Alberta Labour Minister Christina Gray. Below: Opposition MLAs Greg Clark and Richard Starke, who contributed amends to the act passed in the wee hours of yesterday morning.

In the wee hours of yesterday morning, the NDP MLAs in the Alberta Legislature dragged the province’s labour laws into the late 20th Century – with MLAs from the main conservative Opposition parties kicking and screaming every centimetre of the way!

Bill 17, the Fair and Family-friendly Workplaces Act, passed third reading in the Legislature at the end of the June 5 evening session, although it was actually a little after 2 a.m. on June 6 when the voting was finally finished.

The legislation by the government of Premier Rachel Notley is important because it’s been almost 30 years since Alberta updated its labour laws, and the new act brings common practices in other provinces that have worked well for decades into use in Alberta, where labour relations laws in particular had come to be the most backward in the country under successive Progressive Conservative governments.

Changes include the introduction of first-collective-agreement compulsory arbitration, a mechanism for requiring employers to negotiate in good faith with newly unionized employees seeking a first contract, and a provision that means a secret-ballot vote will not be required if at least 65 per cent of the employees in a workplace verify their membership in a union. If between 40 and 65 per cent sign union cards, there must be a vote regardless.

For non-union workplaces, the changes brought forward by Labour Minister Christina Gray after a short public consultation were slightly more ambitious.

These included an extra week of job protection for maternity leave, to 16 weeks, protected leave for parents to look after sick children, and new requirements to ensure employees are compensated when they work overtime.

But there was little in the bill mandating changes to the Employment Standards Code, which governs non-union workplaces, and the Alberta Labour Relations Act, which sets the rules for unionized worksites, that corporations and conservative parties aren’t already living with quite comfortably in most Canadian provinces.

Even determined conservative partisans like Postmedia’s Lorne Gunter conceded that the NDP’s legislation is far from revolutionary. “For the most part, their proposed amendments to the Employment Standards Code and the Labour Relations Code seem pretty bland,” he wrote in his column on May 25. “The changes the Alberta NDP are proposing are already standard practice at many (most?) Alberta businesses.”

Even the provision allowing a workplace to be certified if more than 65 per cent of the workers agree to be union members is not worth getting excited about, Mr. Gunter accurately advised his readers, “because 65-per-cent-sign-up almost never happens.”

In other words, even a Conservative firebrand like Mr. Gunter was telling his pals in the the Progressive Conservative and Wildrose parties to calm down and not light their hair on fire.

This seemed to have no effect, however, with the Wildrose Opposition in particular introducing amendments that, had they been enacted, would have not only have interfered with the fair collective bargaining process guaranteed by the courts, but in some cases abrogated such fundamental rights as freedom of association guaranteed by the Charter of Rights.

Wildrose amendments, for example, called for an end to the Rand Formula, the standard dues-check-off practice in Canada since the 1940s that ensures no employee will opt out of the union simply to avoid dues yet reap the benefits of collective bargaining; opposed first-collective agreement arbitration; and tried to make it illegal for union supporters to visit potential members’ homes during an organizing drive. When it comes to violating fundamental rights, that last one is pretty much in line with the recent ban on membership in the Jehovah’s Witness church in capitalist Russia!

The NDP did accept a couple of Opposition amendments, which were included in the final version of the law:

  • An increase in the time an employer has to respond when an employee gives notice she intends to return to work after an unpaid leave, from 48 hours to one week. This amendment, proposed by Alberta Party Leader Greg Clark, recognizes that employers may have moved or hired other staff to fill in for the employee on leave and may need more time to transition affected employees to other duties.
  • A change in the regulations allowing the government to consult medical professionals about adding them to the list of professionals permitted to sign doctors’ notes. This amendment by PC MLA Richard Starke would make it possible for the government, after consultation, to add Nurse Practitioners to the professions that could sign such notes.

Additional amendments proposed by Ms. Gray and passed by the Legislature included clarifying appeal processes for cancellation of work-averaging agreements, adding flexibility to group termination notices, more clearly defining dependent contractors, and excluding physicians from labour relations provisions since they bargain collectively through their own association.

Some of the comments in opposition to this bill by Wildrose and PC MLAs deserve closer attention, and will get it in future posts on AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Most changes will take effect on Jan. 1, 2018. Some Labour Code amendments will come into effect sooner, on Sept. 1, 2017.

While the Opposition objections to the bill went over the top at times, observers who were in the House during the debate suggested their hearts weren’t really in it. Indeed, they were agreeable to the 2 o’clock cutoff for debate on Wednesday morning. They were, after all, anxious to get back to their ridings to sell their United Conservative Party merger deal to their skeptical party members.

4 Comments to: Finally, early in the 21st Century, NDP braves Opposition outrage to drag Alberta labour law into the late 20th Century

  1. Kang the barbarian

    June 7th, 2017

    Did they ban the use of scab labour during strikes as Quebec did in the late 1970s? If not this is pretty small progress.

    Reply
  2. pogo

    June 7th, 2017

    I guess it’s time to ramp up the re-election strategy in that ever more unique political construct called Alberta. Let me be the first to say, do not under any circumstance take advice from Andrea Horwath, Adrian Dix, Thomas Mulcair, or anyone who was within a parsec of advising their campaigns in the past through to and including the present where Ms Horwath is concerned. A.H. is without a doubt the anti-genius (among these three) of self defeating political calculus. Here she is today bemoaning the fact that Liberals steal the ideas from the NDP. She then proceeds off into the weeds accusing them of failing to implement them correctly and then with a solid twelve gauge expostulation to the foot she claims ideological purity! This from someone who didn’t have the guts to bring down Dalton McGuinty when that chance was steamy on a golden platter in front of her crying out that principles demanded it! Every day I witness politicians doing and saying things that demand ridicule, and every day I see your premier as maybe the best leader anywhere in Canada. I say base the campaign on that.

    Reply
  3. Expat Albertan

    June 7th, 2017

    Just goes to show how good capital has had it for so many decades that even minor changes make them all fall apart… you should see the ‘end is near’ nonsense in the Ontario papers over the $15/hour minimum wage. The general argument is that businesses will have to stop hiring if they have to pay higher wages, to which I respond that if an enterprise can’t function without paying its workers a living wage, it isn’t an enterprise worth surviving (same goes for our current version of capitalism).

    Reply
  4. Farmer B

    June 9th, 2017

    One simple question, government would have us believe that by increasing the cost of C02 with a carbon tax we will have less of it. Is it not counterintuitive that by increasing the cost of labour we will have more jobs?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)