On the day of the Calgary-Shaw by-election, a photo began to appear on social media of United Conservative Party candidate Mike Derry’s campaign manager, Craig Chandler, planting signs begging Conservatives not to split their vote in the riding.

“Don’t split the vote! Vote UCP!” urged the message, which showed up close to official signs encouraging voters to support Kyle Joseph of the Progressive Tory Party founded by Airdrie-Cochrane MLA and former UCP cabinet minister Peter Guthrie.
“Here’s the UCP’s campaign manager for Calgary-Shaw putting up unofficial ‘Don’t split the vote’ signs right beside ours,” Mr. Guthrie complained in an election-day post accompanying one copy of the photo. “It’s cynical politics: asking people to vote out of fear rather than for something they believe in. Don’t reward this behaviour. Vote for integrity, accountability and responsible government. Vote Tory.”
Nearly 1,000 voters did. So, regardless of the placement of the signs, Mr. Chandler’s fears appear to have been justified as far as the UCP was concerned. At least, many of Mr. Joseph’s votes were certainly likely cast by electors who in more normal times would have instinctively voted for the UCP because it has the word “Conservative” in its name.
When Elections Alberta published the unofficial results of the by-election in the historically conservative-voting riding late Tuesday night, 582 votes separated Mr. Derry from the winner, the Alberta NDP’s Kyle Campbell, so a strong case can certainly be made that what Mr. Chandler feared is precisely what happened.
Whether all 978 PTP voters would have cast a ballot for the UCP this year in the absence of Mr. Joseph and the PTP is another matter, given the governing party’s shenanigans, in particular Premier Danielle Smith’s key role as an enabler of the campaign to break up Canada, not to mention Mr. Derry’s obvious weaknesses as a candidate.

As political commentator Dave Cournoyer observed in his Substack on election night, “It is impossible not to interpret the Calgary-Shaw by-election results as a backlash by Calgary voters against Premier Danielle Smith’s Alberta separation referendum. … Smith’s enthusiastic tolerance of the separatists in her party has now become an electoral liability that should concern Calgary’s UCP MLAs about their own political futures.”
For that reason, the PTP’s modest but significant showing on Sept. 14 means it can go into the runup for the next provincial election with renewed credibility – some of which the UCP seemed to have squelched with its efforts to keep Mr. Guthrie from using the Progressive Conservative name he wanted for his new party and to woo Lesser Slave Lake MLA Scott Sinclair back to the UCP backbenches after a brief flirtation with the rebel conservative party.
It must also be noted that a similar argument about Alberta Liberal Leader John Roggeveen’s 602 votes costing the NDP might have been made had Mr. Campbell not done so well. I’m not so sure of that, though. Historically in Western Canada, NDP voters have often found it easier to break toward Conservatives than toward Liberals. I’m more inclined to see Mr. Roggeveen’s minor success as a kind of Carney bounce, likely temporary.
For that reason, former Alberta NDP leader Brian Mason warned me yesterday, “it’s likely that the Tory vote takes away NDP support as much as, or more, than UCP votes.”

Be that as it may, the PTP’s appearance as a blip on the radar now may mean more fund-raising potential to run campaigns in more ridings later, as well as a serious counter effort by the UCP to eliminate Mr. Guthrie’s threat in his own riding.
Regardless of how that works out, Premier Smith has to know now that she will go into the next general election with a significant potential for a split conservative vote in some urban electoral districts, a distraction from focusing on attacking the NDP. The trouble is, as Mr. Mason suggests, the NDP may have the same problem.
Still, as Mr. Mason famously joked in 2011: “I like right-wing parties! In fact, I like right-wing parties so much I want there to be two of them! Or three!”

I am not so sanguine in re the Alberta Liberal party; John Roggeveen is not Laurence Decore. For all intents and purposes, the ABNDP is the viable centrist party in Alberta.
As for the PTP, with all due respect to Mr. Mason, I disagree. Using my (usually) conservative “rurban” parents & their friends as a bellweather, they will stay at home first.
So now we have Chandler and the UPC begging for votes on voting day…, that’s pathetic. And whether it was un-official, or not, he still in an official capacity representing Derry, the UPC candidate and the UPC party. The UPC deserved to lose, because everything they’re doing and currently stand for, was not discussed in the last election and Alberta did not give them a mandate to do all this. As a matter of fact, didn’t Smith lie, when she said she was not going to privatize healthcare? It would make me very happy, if the UPC separatist party just disappeared.
I’m reluctant to take a guess where the Tory Party’s votes came from in this byelection but maybe Brian Mason has a point. This is Calgary, after all, and there may be different factors at play here than say, Edmonton, or Lethbridge. Peter Guthrie seems articulate and speaks convincingly, and seems savvy, yet he was the first UCP MLA to endorse Danielle Smith as their party leader in the first place. And she rewarded him with a cabinet position, so there’s that. She wasn’t exactly new on the scene, and her history in Calgary regarding the School board fiasco, and her floor-crossing as the Wildrose Party Leader (taking a squad of Wildrose MLA’s with her) to Jim Prentice’s Progressive Conservative Party pretty well established her trustworthiness vis a vis her own ambitions. From the Airdrie newspaper,
“Guthrie says she is a leader who stands by her convictions, will stand up to Ottawa, and believes in efficient government.
“With Danielle’s experience and positive mindset, I feel she will be a real difference-maker to inspire change within our party.”
Maybe he was just guessing who was likely to win and what he would get out of it? Perhaps she said, I think I’m going to win and if you endorse me I’ll make you a Cabinet Minister??
https://discoverairdrie.com/articles/mla-peter-guthrie-endorses-danielle-smith
Guthrie and his kind make me want to vomit, “he was the first UCP MLA to endorse Danielle Smith as their party leader in the first place”. Is he that stupid and naive? Where has he been living in a cave? Everybody with half a brain, especially an MLA, knows what the UCP is made of and that babies are not found in the cabbage patch. Get a Cabbage Patch doll, get out of politics, do us all a favour. Please! Look both ways, make certain your laces are done up, and don’t forget your lunch.
Interestingly, Smith is trying to set the tone yet again for this discussion with a bit of disingenuous gaslighting and blame shifting. According to her vote splitting with the new Tory party was the problem here. It is a problem, but not the only one and not the most important one.
The bigger problem is the UCP has become extreme and dominated by its separatist wing. The votes for the new Tory party is just a sign that more moderate conservatives can’t stomach this any more. Heck a lot stayed home in the last election because of concerns about Smith. Even more may in the next election and of course some may vote for the new Tory party too.
As the results for the Alberta Liberal Party in this by election shows, there has also been some vote splitting on the centre left. The good news for the NDP is this is probably not going to grow much if any. However, the new Tory party does some potential now to attract even more attention and support, especially after its decent by election showing for a new party.
So it is not just vote splitting in this by election that worries Smith, it is the potential for the Tory party to gain more support at her party’s expense and it may if the UCP does not smarten up. Smith seems to have dug in her heels so far about things like the referendum and it is probably to late to change direction here even if she wanted, which I suspect she doesn’t. She may have convinced herself she is right. Unfortunately for her, this time most Albertans are not buying it any more.
I have been following the PTP from its incarnation. I believe Mr. Guthrie and all are onto something. NDP is kryptonite for many conservatives and many of us who are center and a tad right have no home. Therefore he is a great option. Having said that I will vote for the party who has the better chance of boating the UCP from power.
Craig Chandler did not get it/does not get it.
Many people like me simply are not willing to vote UCP. Is there any wonder based on their performance?? Many former Conservative voters like me have walked, will walk, from the UCP.
Besides, from my perspective, voting UCP is like voting for the Take Back Alberta group.
Only that group is not on the ballot. So why should I vote for their proxy.
If the NDP can catch lightning in a bottle for a second time will they repeal Bill 14 and make it legal to use the words “conservative” and “wildrose” once again? It would be nice if they would but is it likely? As past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior we do have to remember that when the NDP were scorched by the farm safety act they resorted to half measures and were the very definition of milquetoast. Allowing the use of these words again will make the UCP very angry. Will the NDP grow a spine if elected?
Great news! I will vote NDP, but have been donating to the Tory party, hoping for Conservative vote splitting. So far, the Tory party is our only hope to bring a somewhat sane Conservative view to Alberta politics. I watch for Bonnie Critchley, a Tory candidate. To me she represents Alberta Conservatives before the well was poisoned by Klein, Love, Harper, and Kenney.
In paragraph 4, in the middle it starts with “A least”. Should this perhaps be “At least”?
In my view when Smith crossed the floor and the idea of combining the Cons and Wild Rose is the worst idea ever. That along with Smith’s lies has lead this Province down a really bad road. It is encouraging to see some of these goofy ideas backfire.
OA: Thanks. Fixed. DJC
A well written article. The UCP and Danielle Smith have to be concerned. Her popularity in the polls has sunk further. It’s because of how bad the UCP are.
Vote splitting isn’t the most compelling explanation for the result in the Calgary-Shaw by election. While it’s true that the Progressive Tory vote total exceeded the difference between the UCP and the NDP vote, I think the fact that the NDP was able to amass so many votes in a formerly safe conservative riding is a far more important question.
Last night I watched a number of videos on YouTube about the by-election outcome, including a couple by leading Alberta separatists, including Corey Morgan. While there was much ringing of hands and gnashing of teeth, one thing seemed obvious, and that was the absolute fear that this signaled that the referendum on October 19 was going to be a wipeout for the separatists.
This illuminates, in my opinion, the real meaning of the result in Calgary Shaw. Voters supported the NDP – or more accurately – abandoned the UCP, precisely because of its direct involvement with Alberta separatism. In my opinion, that is the real story here. Not vote splitting, not Nenshi, – but the strong and clear reaction of voters against Alberta separatism in a solid blue constituency.
That is the message that voters of Calgary-Shaw have sent to the Alberta separatists. They should not ask for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for them.
This is good news but the NDP has one serious problem – Where is Naheed Nenshi
https://thewalrus.ca/as-albertas-referendum-looms-where-is-naheed-nenshi/
Carlos, as an NDP party member, I know where Nenshi is and Calgarians in the Shaw riding and elsewhere know where Nenshi is, as do rural Albertans. But if you are looking for him in the media, where the only story is “Where’s Nenshi?”, you look in vain. He could stand on his head and sing Oh, Canada as he makes his announcements, and the general public would still hear crickets.
Ok LAS
Go on with that system and we will have an opportunity to see the results.
I am not stupid and I understand your point but I also know what reality looks like.
You can find Nenshi and others all over youtube, such as here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRK8HQzw18iohyF518wdkUA
I’ve listened to some of their press conferences and they sound like intelligent sensible people, including Nenshi. They speak mostly in sentences, not slogans.
Modern conservatism is schismatic. It tries to cobble together multiple flavours of conservatism into artificial “frankenparties” [our host’s coinage, if I’m not mistaken], but the unity is fragile. The most illustrative example today has to be the ongoing implosion of the BC Conservative Party since the narrow leadership victory by Kerry-Lynn Findlay, known in BC politics circles as KLF.
Conservatives would actually be better off staying separate, and instead abandoning their vociferous opposition to different electoral models such as proportional representation or ranked ballots. So-called “vote splitting”, which is really just first-past- the-post functioning as designed, would no longer be as much of a factor.
I’ve never seen an election sign with a flys swatter before. That’s something.
Heh, Brian Mason’s joke reminds me of our local ads by Pete the Plumber, who says: “I love my competition ’cause they make me look so good!”