Alberta Premier Danielle Smith marked the “Alberta Day” moment in time with a couple of significantly different official messages and an apocalyptic prophecy.

Yesterday morning at 10 o’clock, an email from the government showed up in journalists’ email accounts bearing Ms. Smith’s official Alberta Day message. This was obviously considered important enough to be reproduced in Canada’s other official language, an inclusive touch one wouldn’t normally have expected from a United Conservative Party Government.
For the most part, it was the usual happy holiday pish-posh, except, of course, that Alberta Day is not a holiday. We’re celebrating our rich cultural heritage. We look confidently to the future. Yadda-yadda. The last line even echoed the national anthem, sort of: “Happy Alberta Day and may our province forever remain strong and free.”
The third paragraph, which turns out to be the most significant, began: “We recognize the Indigenous Peoples whose enduring connection to and stewardship of this land continues to shape Alberta.” This was positive, and even a hopeful sign for those of us who believe that we are all Treaty people here in Alberta, and ought to act accordingly.
Fifty-five minutes later, an “UPDATED” email appeared. The first sentence of the third paragraph now read: “Generations of Albertans from many backgrounds have helped build our province through hard work, innovation and a shared belief in freedom.”
The reference to Indigenous people had been excised.

The message adopted a more strident tone, continuing: “From the energy that powers our nation, to the food that feeds the world, to the entrepreneurs, workers and innovators who drive our economy forward, Alberta has always punched above its weight. We are a province of builders, dreamers and doers who refuse to settle for anything less than the best.”
“Let us continue building a strong and sovereign Alberta within a united Canada, confident in who we are, proud of what we contribute and ready to seize the opportunities ahead,” this version concluded.
Naturally, it didn’t take long for these changes to be noticed by the sharp-eyed denizens of social media, and questions were immediately raised about what the heck was going on. To his credit, CHED Radio host Courtney Theriault asked Ms. Smith’s spokesperson, Sam Blackett, what had just happened.
“Earlier today, an updated version of the Premier’s statement on Alberta Day was issued in error,” Mr. Blackett responded. “The initial statement that was issued at 10:00am stands and will be reflected on Alberta.ca/news. We apologize for this error and any confusion that it may have caused.”
So what exactly was the error here? That an embarrassing fight between factions in the UCP strategic brain trust had been revealed? Simple confusion in which a first draft became a final draft? Someone forgot who was supposed to be cancelled in the new Alberta? Speculation is rife, naturally, although chances are good we’ll never know for sure.
Grand Chief Trevor Mercredi of the Treaty 8 Sovereign Nations called the removal deeply troubling. “Our Nations are not a footnote to Alberta’s story,” he said in a news release. “Treaty Nations were here long before Alberta existed, and our place in this land cannot be erased when it becomes politically inconvenient.” His statement called the change “particularly concerning in the context of the Alberta government’s ongoing efforts to advance separation-related initiatives while challenging the constitutional status of Treaty rights and the duty to consult.”

Meanwhile, Premier Smith also served up some oil patch eschatology, warning that the End Times are nigh if Canada pushes back against Trump’s tariffs. Postmedia political columnist Rick Bell was the semi-official conduit for what arguably was Ms. Smith’s real Alberta Day message yesterday.
Taking on the role of U.S. President Donald Trump’s unofficial Alberta spokesperson, Ms. Smith – who was “on fire,” according to Mr. Bell – said Canada has no options but to surrender.
This is an opinion that most Canadians don’t appear share, if you go by yesterday’s federal by-election results. But put an export tax on Canadian oil, she told her amanuensis, and the U.S. response would “wipe out the Ontario and Quebec economies.”
“I don’t want that to happen,” Mr. Bell quoted her saying. “I’m trying to keep Canada from doing something that dumb because I know what the effects would be.”
Ergo, she continued, Alberta will be keeping Kentucky bourbon and watery American beer on the liquor store shelves, thank you very much.
Mr. Bell’s account concluded with the premier warning that the Americans would develop the Venezuelan tar patch out of spite and put Alberta out of business, plus blaming all our troubles on Justin Trudeau.
As for her apocalyptic claims about Mr. Trump’s Venezuela oil deal, which the U.S. president announced last Friday, here’s what Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman had to say on Alberta Day: “Even if the deal holds, oil experts are extremely doubtful that Venezuela can significantly increase its oil production soon, if ever. It would take years to rebuild the oil infrastructure even if corporations are willing to sink in the necessary billions of dollars. There are also issues with the quality of Venezuelan oil.”

Smith and crew are usually not so muddled in their messaging. I don’t know but perhaps some of the known day drinkers in her government are to blame for tempting others. Yes, its not a bank holiday, but that perhaps does not deter those who like to start early.
So we now seem to have great confusion related to what should have been a very straightforward anniversary message. The bilingual message was a nice touch for a change and the indigenous acknowledgement too. However it may have been too much for someone who was not feeling as magnanimous, despite it being Alberta’s day.
Smith isn’t on fire, she’s really a bit of a downer these days, but it seems there may be a bit of a dumpster fire in her communications office now.
Only her hair is on fire (LOL)
(Sorry, couldn’t resist)
Danielle Smith will continue to stick her foot in her mouth. The UCP also has a bad communications team. The more Danielle Smith sticks her foot in her mouth, the more she erodes her chances of remaining in politics.
Considering that Venezuelan oil, while abundant, it’s also well know in Venezuela that it’s about to be raped and pillaged by Trump. Trump maybe popular for ousting Maduro, this maybe a situation of the more than things change, the more they stay the same. Or, get even worse. Venezuelans know that all that happened with the ousting of Maduro, is that everyone in his regime, who maybe were in his bad books, got promoted. If anything, Trump’s kidnapping of Maduro was a good career move for a lot of thugs in sycophants in the regime. As for using this against Canada, yeah, that’s Trump’s angle. But also considering that Venezuela’s infrastructure is practically broken after decades of neglect, this power play is not going to happen overnight. But then neither is Canada’s reinvention of itself, for that matter.
The endgame here is the hope that Mango Mussolini will soon throw off his mortal coil. Or, he leaves office, on time, in 2028. But I have my doubts he intends to leave office then. He intends to stick around and challenge for a third term. Even Anthony Scaramuci admits that the US Constitution, for all its brilliance, is riddled with holes and grey areas. Nothing it predictable anymore.
Probably little Venezuelan oil would be produced for years and apparently it is dirtier than Alberta’s heavy oil. Besides, I would think the Venzuelans would have something to say about Americans stealing their oil, as in “Let’s nationalize the oil industry again.” After all their corrupt government won’t last forever and neither will Trump.
“I’m trying” said Danielle.
And I would say “Don’t Try, Danielle”.
I believe Al
OST no one in Canada, in Alberta wants your devious interference , anywhere, any more.
The problem in Alberta seems to be too many unattended garden rakes.
FYEO. Many years ago I was golfing at Montebello. A sudden down-pour backed up the front duo with myself. I was surprised to meet Prime Minister Jean Chrétien and his friend Jean Allard. I asked Monsieur Chrétien if he had a plan for a possible yes win in 1995, he looked up pondering an answer when his friend shook his head. He looked at me and said “We thought of the Romans” he smiled, we exchanged polite banter. His friend was happy with the ambiguous response. The sun came out, we returned to golf.
No one could have known the ace of history in my pocket. My love of all history.
When the Romans conquered a region they would raise a local legion. What many don’t know is they always moved the newly raised and Rome trained legion to another conquered region, Legion Britania to Iberia, Dacian to Britania. Dacia is the current Romania so devastated by the Romans after an uprising even their name and civilisation is forgotten to time.
I made some discreet phone calls to my military friends and found out the Princess Pats were flying to Quebec for training and the Royal 22nd to Alberta.
I am sorry this must be keep under the sheets. Common knowledge would only help Quebec and Alberta seperatists and could be used to dishonour CANADA.
“Danielle Smith’s official message kept changing”
In other words, lots of cheap talk and big PR promises that fail to deliver for all of the die hard suckers and true believers in the audience, along with everyone else. As an example,
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-insurance-savings-400-doubtful-analysis-1.7603277
“Alberta homeowners are once again paying the fastest-rising insurance bills in the country. According to the Applied Rating Index for the second quarter of 2026, released by Applied Systems on July 22, 2026, home insurance rates in Alberta climbed 11.9% compared with a year earlier, the steepest year-over-year increase of any province. Personal auto rates rose even faster, up 22.6%, also the highest in Canada.”
As costs continue to escalate, catering to the needs of shareholders and their lobbyists continues to be priority number one for the golden shower trickle down lobbyist in charge.
Add to this the news that we are supposed to pop a copy of our photo ID in an envelope with our mail-in ballots for the fall referendum.
What in the name of all that is fascist is going on in Alberta?
This is the government that did nothing when the entire voters’ list was posted on the internet for the whole world to see. Now we are supposed to trust them with our photo ID? What are they going to do with it? Is anonymous voting a thing of the past? Even people who vote in person don’t have to give a photocopy of their ID. We know this corrupt government doesn’t care about identity theft, but now we no longer have the democratic right to vote anonymously.
We need the United Nations to step in to supervise this vote! Meanwhile, the rest of Canada doesn’t know what will happen to them if Danielle Smith is allowed to get away with this.
So if we have to send in photocopied ID, with our mail in ballot, then doesn’t that break voter confidentiality laws? And what happens after the vote, do they share our ID and how we voted, with the people that have the Alberta’s voter list? I think Elections Alberta needs to answer some serious questions. This whole thing reeks of road kill on a hot Summers day.
Perhaps Smith should just stay in the US? It would make things a lot better here. I see Rick Bell is just as big of an ass kisser as Smith is. While the entire country is behind Carney, Smith and Bell seem to be the only ones that want to cave in to Trump.
The news reported earlier, that acts of violence and racism is on the up-swing against some Alberta citizens. The UPC under Smith, is on the sidelines talking about freedom of speech. Everyone that resides in Alberta is an Albertan / is a citizen and every Albertan is working hard to make a good life for themselves and their families. It strikes me, that the Smith government is racist and race entitled and to diss Alberta’s Indigenous citizens like that and then to deflect responsibility is bull shit. And the only oil apocalypse is in her mind.
It’s crucial to recognize the legitimacy of the treaties because they in turn legitimize the outright ethnic cleansing and alienation that constitute the actual relations between the Crown and the descendants of the people who lived here when the King stole the land and gave it to the Hudson’s Bay Company, who of course, sold the stolen freebie to the Bank of Montreal/Canada in exchange for lots o’ loot and more land that was used for railroads and hydrocarbon extraction. The US will do what they will, as they demonstrated very clearly in Venezuela and Iran of late. The notion that Derpberta or the rest of the country will defy the Empire to any significant degree is patently absurd. One might keep in mind that one party to the treaties is the Crown, and recall the fate of Wat Tyler. Tyler’s fate is likewise a reminder of what befalls those who treat with our great ally and partner to the south.
The Town of Rocky Mountain House recently excised (eviscerated?) any reference to indigenous peoples, in particular or in general, from its Land Acknowledgement text.
AI) “The Town of Rocky Mountain House amended its procedural bylaw to change the specific wording used in its official Land Acknowledgement rather than completely removing it.
Approved in early March 2026, the town council passed procedural amendments that included removing specific Indigenous nation names from the spoken acknowledgement.
Wording Change: Specific references to the Blackfoot, Cree, Saulteaux, Stoney, and Métis nations were replaced with a more generalized phrase recognizing “the people who came before us”.
Context: Proponents of the change on council argued the revised phrasing was broader and more inclusive, while critics and community members expressed concern that removing specific historical nation names subverts the intent of truth and reconciliation.”
Original Version
“Acknowledgement of Indigenous Peoples (June 2, 2020)
“The Town of Rocky Mountain House wishes to acknowledge that the land on which we gather is Treaty 6 Territory and a traditional meeting ground and home for many Indigenous Peoples, including the Blackfoot, Cree, Saulteaux, Stoney and Métis.”
https://rockymtnhouse.com/p/local-notices/e7c1efcd-6c30-46af-87a0-ef09178496c4
Revised and Current Version
“Acknowledgement of Indigenous Peoples
“The Town of Rocky Mountain House acknowledges the people who came before us on this land.”
https://www.rockymtnhouse.com/p/land-acknowledgement
Of course, this change subverts the original intention of the land acknowledgement.
What could be the point of acknowledging “the people who came before us”? Anybody anywhere can do that.
The purpose of an INDIGENOUS(!) land acknowledgment is to explicitly recognize indigenous peoples — the historical fact that distinct nations with their own cultures long preceded us here — if not also a call to remedy the ongoing injustice of their removal, displacement, dispossession, deprivation, segregation, cultural destruction, and discrimination against them.
AI) “An Indigenous land acknowledgement is a formal statement that recognizes the unique and enduring relationship between Indigenous peoples and their traditional territories.
Honouring History: It recognizes Indigenous peoples as the original stewards of the land.
Showing Respect: It expresses gratitude to the traditional caretakers of the territory.
Truth-Telling: It acknowledges the history of colonialism, treaty relationships, and forced displacement.
Reconciliation Momentum: It serves as a foundational step toward building better relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.
Key Components
The Land: Naming the specific traditional territory or treaty area (e.g., Treaty 6, Treaty 7).
The People: Explicitly naming the Indigenous nations historically and currently tied to that area.
The Present: Acknowledging that Indigenous peoples continue to live, work, and contribute to the community today.”
RMH’s generic land acknowledgment whitewashes indigenous peoples out of the picture.
Repeating the crime, instead of making amends for it.
Letter to the Editor from former Town Councillor Michelle Narang:
“Naming those Nations is not exclusionary. It is the acknowledgement.”
https://www.facebook.com/michellenarang/posts/pfbid02bjSkexo7YVjo4biPcMUS4jw9e1rDr9kxMsMTsMuKQyWvcDSK5GEkWsgDrL5D8unEl
It was also noted that the French version of ‘her’ statement was never updated.
Clearly it’s difficult for Dani and her team to keep on story. Wasn’t there something, issued a long time ago, about her having some professional group prepare and issue her blurbs? If so, why was Sam Blackett involved?
“I’m trying to keep Canada from doing something that dumb because I know what the effects would be.”
Brilliant! If you can’t get into Harvard or Oxford, you can resort to name-calling. Most people, of course, prefer civility. Projection, thy name is Danielle Smith, or is it Smith-Trump-Smoot-Hawley?
Just me or is anyone else wondering if Danielle Smith is okay these days? Her policy statements (lies) are swinging back and forth faster than a cat’s tail in a room full of rocking chairs. This morning, government spokesperson Rick Bell claims that Smith is not ruling out going after Trump and might tax American liquor. At least that’s the headline. I refuse to waste any money on that rag and actually read the paywalled article. So, what the hell are we doing here? It may well be, as you point out, that there are opposing forces at work in the premier’s office. The second official Alberta Day statement yesterday looked like it might have been written by – hmmmm, her Chief of Staff? BTW, Danielle held another ‘town hall’ for UCP members only in Okotoks last night. Reminder – it isn’t a town hall if it doesn’t include everyone in town! Why hasn’t she shown up at any Forever Canada rallies or events? I thought she said she would be campaigning on behalf of Option 1 on her essay question about separation. Haven’t noticed any campaigning on her part. Now she’s headed off on vacay. Work/life balance or mental health break?
HH: Driving to Red Deer this morning, I was thinking about the same thing. Her lies are becoming more obvious, their delivery more frequent. That said, not many people will notice. You have to be paying attention. She has to worry about being deposed by the seppies, who now make up the bulk of the UCP caucus and probably the CPC Alberta caucus, so she’s probably feeling a lot of stress. Re the Postmedia paywall: Download and open a new browser with a good private browsing mode, open the story you want to read and it will all be there. You’ll have to create a new private browsing page for each story, but that’s not much work. The Globe’s paywall is harder to get through. Yesterday Ms. Smith was saying the opposite of what she appears to be saying today. DJC
“Re the Postmedia paywall”:
https://www.skipthepaywall.com
Further methods are available online, in addition to the method described by Mr. DJC.
Yesterday CBC News Network ran an interview with Smith, I think about Bill 11 and the protests about the dual – care model coming in effect, along with basically kissing Trump’s ass. There were some questions from the press, but given my distain for Dingy I didn’t watch any of this. The funny part is after the initial interview, neither CBC News Network or CTV News Network ran the piece, nor was there any mention of it afterwards. There was a short clip during the local evening news. Looks like the major networks no longer care for her lies anymore. As well it seems she is trying to latch on to any of the other premiers and get support for her ridiculous approach without success.
Nepo baby Sam Blackett is the son of former Alberta PC cabinet member Lindsay Blackett.
Hello DJC and felow commenters,
Couldn’t we “serve up some eschatology” on the Alberta premier’s reign of error (apologies to DJC) by somehow forcing an early election and voting her out? At least one can hope for this.
Moaners, groaners, or boners, it’s hard to tell, but tendentiously thumb-nailing titular formality has to be one of them. Danielle seems to have an endless supply; the latest, like rewording of a civic Land Acknowledgment, is tantamount to titling a legislative Act something like, “The Sovereign Alberta Act Within A [Sorta] Country That Likes To Call Alberta A Federate [Or Whatever]”.
The winds have changed for the “No-Planet-B” people who’ve been taking this inexhaustibility on their back foot since sunny days stopped shining on topless mountains and varicose pipelines started spreading in every direction of dreamland. Still, the attitude often betrays itself as desperately defensive—just before the karma runs over the dogma.
The old Russian attitude underpinned Stalin’s extermination of the Soviet Union’s experienced military officers because, naturally, he presumed them to be endlessly replaceable—just when ascendant Nazi Germany prepared to invade the ancient Russ homeland and he needed them most. D’oh! The Soviets availed Russian vastness to retreat beyond the invader’s reach, and its insurmountable supply of resources to achieve the fastest industrialization in history and, of course, waves of soldiers who might as well been shot at the front by the foe rather than by the friend in the rear.
My WWII-vet dad used to say, “We never woulda won without the Rooskies,” as he called the Soviets. Yes, it was impressive, but 20 million Soviet citizens perished, and untold millions more, post-War, as slave labourers or those accused of collaboration when the Red Army retook Nazi occupied territory—the “golden age” Putin rationalizes as recoverable using the same old Russian attitude of inexhaustibility, even at the cost of a thousand soldiers a day to maintain the stasis of the Donbas and the murder of Ukrainian school children. The Munchkin of Moscow seems to be saying, “You might as well surrender cuz I can do this forever, comrade.”
War-suckertary Pete Hogsbreath has been similarly hollowing out experienced personnel from the US armed forces, not because tRump fears his own crew might take him out, as Stalin did, but rather that they probably wouldn’t obey his orders if they were, you know, too illegal. No more portly middle-aged generals poring over maps in the Pentagon: no, sirree!—a hundred push-ups on command, even it takes a caulking-tube-full of testosterone to do it. And no more military women: no, ma’am! Male hormone might be fine for them on the cannon-foddered front or the Olympics, but Stalin would have definitely prohibited battle-scarred amazons hanging about in the Kremlin. Double that risk for the Orange sex offender.
Naturally tRump’s attitude of inexhaustibility is paid for with ill-gotten money and “leverage.” He imagines he’ll never run out of is his ability to get away with it at no cost to himself—not that his schematic ignorance of history ignores the galling proportions of human suffering: he simply doesn’t care. Rather he’s confident that his transaction-by-transaction, tactical approach to everything is as inexhaustible as the reputed power of the USA, when in fact it rests entirely on his glee in snatching whatever it is he needs to stopgap the bulging economic and strategic embolism he is blithely preparing for his own country. What does he care whether a civil liability is $5 million or $85 million? Somebody else is going to pay for it.
Both Stalin and tRump’s motivations were in response to serious trouble when their nations were/are being tested to the very limit. The counter narrative to that vulnerability was/is of course to act as if invulnerable, as if there is no limit to their capacity to respond, parry, and prevail. The attitude of inexhaustibility can only be sustained by corruption and treachery; it exhausts itself —as Afghanistan did to the Stalin’s USSR and Iran is doing to tRump’s USA.
Danielle Smith fancies she draws from an abyssal well, the threat of secession from Canada. She might even believe her own reasoning—her dismissal of court orders and treaties, of Canada Strong teamwork, and her ‘friendship’ with the Orange Diaper Baby; certainly many of her supporters do. But even that is underpinned by an attitude of physical inexhaustibility—that of the bitumen sands.
For those who believe or would have us believe that the resource is inexhaustible, the atmosphere is a limitless storehouse of carbon-pollution. For those who understand that no resource is inexhaustible, the prospect is rather “virtually endless,” even though the vast majority of the sandy deposit is not feasibly accessible with today’s technology. But more-modest estimates of accessibility, being in range of a few centuries at current rates of extraction and technological capability, are easily spun as virtually endless. Whence the “crime” of leaving it in the ground, thence the alleged enmity of Treaty First Nations, the Crown and Sasquatch. The Manning Doctrine is that the threat is as infinite as the resource.
That kind of resort indicates that Danielle and Big-Bitumen are feeling as threatened as Stalin on the eve of Hitler’s invasion, and of tRump on the eve of his third impeachment—threatened by limitation just like capitalism was of socialism when it reared its millions of hard-hatted heads from the mines, mills, and factories for the good of us all— that threat to infinite growth that extended a different invisible hand-up than Adam Smith ever articulated.
Remind that in Ronald Wright’s Short History of Progress progressiveness is an illusion of inexhaustibility that succeeds only until it hits the limit of growth. Limitless progress is still proffered and believed because society has never before run out of planet. The fact that humankind is scouring the ocean floor for “critical” minerals and planning industrialization of the Moon and Mars oughta be a hunt. As we used to say at Franklin Camp: Earth First!—we’ll log the other planets later. Franklin, btw, was once the biggest logging camp on the West Coast; it was abandoned and torn down decades ago.