Alberta Politics
Pope Francis: “prioritizing short-term economic benefits” is not a good enough reason not to have a carbon tax (Photo: Catholic Church England, Creative Commons).

Left by the pope with a choice between glory to God and death to the carbon tax, what will Jason do?

Posted on June 17, 2019, 1:35 am
7 mins

Turns out you really can’t serve God and Mammon! Who knew?

Tout le monde Conservative Alberta was reeling over the weekend at Friday’s news from Rome that Pope Francis, leader of 1.3 billion Catholics, has declared global warming to be a real thing and putting a price on carbon to be “essential” to saving the planet.

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

At a closed-door meeting of the Vatican’s Academy of Sciences, a concept that at some points in the Church’s history would have been oxymoronic, His Holiness sternly lectured the CEOs of Royal Dutch Shell, Eni, BP, Repsol, Conoco Phillips, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and executives of sundry investment funds to get with the program and stop standing in the way of planetary salvation.

This has to be causing some consternation in the circles closest to Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, the “former WASP” and convert to Roman Catholicism who for many years has been portraying himself as more Catholic than the pope.

Up to now, this may have appeared compatible with the premier’s crusade against carbon taxes, the heart of his passive-aggressive attack on climate science in which he halfheartedly acknowledges the reality global temperatures are rising while doing everything he can to deny the obvious reason for it.

Hitherto, Mr. Kenney has seemed like the sort of fellow who reckons the Inquisition was on the right track in 1633 when it threatened to torture Galileo Galilei to make him recant his notion the earth revolves around the sun, rather than the other way around.

What is Mr. Kenney to do now that the infallible Pontifex of Rome has damned – only metaphorically, so far – those who ignore the perils scientists say the planet faces?

Federal Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer (Photo: Andre Forget, Andrew Scheer Flickr).

Could he turn his back on the teachings of the Bishop of Rome when they don’t suit him – as he once accused the Jesuits at the University of San Francisco of doing when they had the temerity to support the right of women on campus to speak freely in support of their reproductive rights? Alert readers will recall that the young Mr. Kenney tried to get the church to declare the institution could not call itself a Catholic university, then dropped out when that didn’t work.

Maybe he could return to his roots in the Anglican Church. Not much satisfaction there, alas. These days Anglicans are all for ordaining women and welcoming LGBTQ folk.

Or maybe the answer would be to set up his own church with his sanctimonious self as pope. I have to tell you, though, it’s been done. At least half the time, that’s basically what that Protestant thing Mr. Kenney abandoned in his early years was about.

And what about United Conservative Party ministers like Adriana LaGrange, the fiercely anti-abortion holder of the education portfolio in Mr. Kenney’s cabinet? Will this former Catholic school board chair argue the pope is right about abortion and homosexuality and wrong about climate change? That would make her almost as inconsistent as those evangelicals who take everything in the Bible literally except the bits that they don’t.

Galileo Galilei, portrait by Justus Sustermans, 1636 (Image: Public Domain).

Whatever will Ms. LaGrange do if Pope Francis declares that teachers in Roman Catholic schools have an obligation to teach climate science? Yikes!

Then there’s federal Conservative leader Andrew Scheer, another piously Roman Catholic constant carbon-tax complainer. No word from him yet, either, on Friday’s papal carbon commentary.

Meanwhile, it would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in Mr. Kenney’s mighty “war room” as its leaders brainstorm ways to take on the Church of Rome and squeeze the pontiff till his pips squeak. After all, there are still plenty of pips in the coffers of Rome! And if you count the Swiss Guard, the pope’s got more divisions than Mr. Kenney has, too.

I suppose the war roomers could threaten to make the Church pay taxes if His Holiness won’t stay in his lane – if only that could be described as something other than a tax increase.

Talk about awkward.

Fortunately for Mr. Kenney and his Catholic caucus and cabinet members, the pope hasn’t made his latest pronouncement on carbon taxes official doctrine. Yet. But who knows, another papal encyclical may be in the works, which really would leave the pious premier in the position of having to choose between glory to God and death to the carbon tax.

It’s not hard to predict what Mr. Kenney and his sanctimonious ilk would do. Catholic Conservatives in Canada have basically been ignoring the last encyclical from Pope Francis on this topic, in 2015.

Still, Pope Francis was pretty clear on Friday. “Faced with a climate emergency, we must take action accordingly, in order to avoid perpetrating a brutal act of injustice towards the poor and future generations,” he said. “We do not have the luxury of waiting for others to step forward, or of prioritizing short-term economic benefits.”

Like Galileo and unlike the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers in Calgary, the fossil fuel multinationals’ CEOs in Rome saw the wisdom of bowing their heads and saying they too support a carbon tax.

That sounds about right to me. Mr. Kenney? Mr. Scheer?

It’s almost enough to make one yearn for the days when excommunication from the One True Church was a credible threat!

10 Comments to: Left by the pope with a choice between glory to God and death to the carbon tax, what will Jason do?

  1. Jim

    June 17th, 2019

    The cynic in me would ask if the Vatican is still investing in fossil fuel companies and having executives on their boards? Likely never get an answer to that given they haven’t made amends for that nasty bit of banking and profiteering in the 40’s. Mussolini’s gift well invested I guess.

    Reply
  2. ronmac

    June 17th, 2019

    God or no God, we are all a carbon-based life form. So it’s only natural we have a carbon tax.

    Reply
    • David Climenhaga

      June 17th, 2019

      Perhaps instead of using the term “carbon levy,” the Dippers should have called it a carbon tithe. Who could argue with that? DJC

      Reply
  3. Geoffrey Pounder

    June 17th, 2019

    Like most cafeteria Christians, Jason Kenney is devoted to his professed faith on Sunday mornings between 10 and 11 AM.
    Monday thru Saturday, Kenney and the UCP serve the Trinity of Big Oil, the Holy High Rollers, and the Almighty Dollar.

    Reply
  4. Albertan

    June 17th, 2019

    …..pure gold!

    Reply
  5. John

    June 17th, 2019

    We’re going to find out how deep Jason’s faith goes fairly soon.

    I’m betting he would rather convert than change his mind politically.

    Reply
  6. pogo

    June 17th, 2019

    I leave this here. A confession of sorts. What dirty people, we are forced to treat with civility! Why not just expose Joel Osteen? Our tormenters thank God for him and Tammy Baker! Anyway boss, we takin’ the hits now. Thanks for at least tryin’ to light their tongues on fire and hit them with street cars! https://youtu.be/1MlMii5BW50 Yours in the only heck that counts! pogo

    Reply
  7. Hana Razga

    June 17th, 2019

    I expect that Jason Kenney and his war roomers will declare the pope an eco-terrorist, what else?

    Reply
  8. Bob Raynard

    June 18th, 2019

    It would be interesting to see what other prominent conservatives are also Catholic. John Carpay was apparently raised Catholic, and Graham Hicks converted to Catholicism to marry – there was an article about it in Western Catholic Reporter a few years ago.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)