Alberta Politics
Social conservative activist and lawyer John Carpay before the doors of a courthouse (Photo: Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms).

What was John Carpay’s goal when he in effect withdrew his apology for comparing Pride flags to swastikas?

Posted on February 11, 2019, 1:14 am
8 mins

John Carpay is a clever man. The high-profile Alberta social conservative leader puts careful thought into what he says and how he says it. A lawyer by profession, he constructs his sentences precisely and deliberately. He knows exactly what he is saying when he says something.

So one has to wonder what the founder and president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms aimed to achieve Saturday in Calgary when he publicly stood by his inflammatory comparison of the Nazi swastika flag and Communist hammer and sickle banner to the rainbow Pride flag that has come to represent the LGBTQ community. The JCCF is a right-wing legal advocacy organization behind a court challenge of Alberta’s Gay-Straight Alliance legislation.

United Conservative Party Leader Jason Kenney (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

Mr. Carpay returned to the topic at the conference organized by another right-wing group called the Economic Education Association of Alberta, apparently a creation of Danny Hozack, a United Conservative Party nomination candidate in the Vermilion-Lloydminster-Wainwright riding.

Participants in the event included several of the best-known members of the Alberta right, among them former provincial finance minister Ted Morton, University of Calgary economist and National Post commentator Jack Mintz, private-school lobby Parents for Choice in Education executive director Donna Trimble, and former Wildrose Alliance leader Paul Hinman.

As a way to drum up publicity, Mr. Carpay’s look back at the controversial Pride flag comparison he made at a Rebel Media event last fall was worthy of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, of which he was once Alberta director. He certainly knew media was likely to be there.

Former Alberta Finance Minister Ted Morton (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

Speaking on “parental rights in the GSA era,” Mr. Carpay told his audience: “So, what did I say at the Rebel speech on November the 10th? I’m going to say it again this morning. That the attacks against our fundamental freedoms can come from any source, any direction, any banner, any flag, any colour, any political symbol can be the banner under which our fundamental freedoms are attacked.”

So what was Mr. Carpay’s goal when he reminded Albertans of the controversy surrounding his original remarks?

You could argue he was softening what he said last fall just a tiny bit by paraphrasing his previous more outrageous comments and defining them as the same as the original comment. This was the interpretation of the StarMetro reporter who covered the event. He refused to elaborate further when the reporter asked him a follow-up question.

But given what happened between November and Saturday, Mr. Carpay had to know he was putting his old friend and ally Jason Kenney, leader of the Opposition United Conservative Party that remains comfortably ahead of the NDP in pre-election polling, in a difficult position.

Parents for Choice in Education Executive Director Donna Trimble (Photo: Parents for Choice in Education).

After all, if Mr. Kenney has an Achilles’ heel in the coming electoral contest, it his own history as a social conservative well outside the Canadian mainstream, a fellow traveller with Mr. Carpay in just the kinds of causes the JCCF fights for.

When Mr. Carpay’s original remark hit the proverbial fan in November, Mr. Kenney was widely attacked for several days for allowing his old friend, whom he once compared to civil rights activist Rosa Parks, to remain a member of the UCP.

It got hot enough Mr. Carpay apologized the next day for his provocative comparison. “In speaking about the nature of the free society, and attacks on the free society, I referred in the same sentence to the rainbow flag and to the flags representing communist and Nazi ideologies,” he said in a statement distributed to media. “In doing so, I unintentionally drew a broad comparison between the rainbow flag and the flags which bear the symbols of Communism and Nazism. I should not have done so, and I apologize.” (Emphasis added.)

Mr. Kenney thereupon defended his refusal to kick Mr. Carpay out of the UCP by saying his friend had apologized for the invidious comparison.

Now Mr. Carpay has, in effect, withdrawn that apology – in a very public though carefully worded manner.

In these circumstances it is reasonable to wonder if Mr. Carpay is trying to box his old friend, to force the UCP leader to publicly stand by his men in Alberta’s social conservative movement over those in the UCP who oppose their project to return the province to the values of the 1950s.

Former Wildrose Alliance leader Paul Hinman (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

Based on several months of polling, the UCP has acted very confident it will win the general election Premier Rachel Notley is expected to call soon no matter what.

The party’s supporters, however, remain sharply divided on the social conservative agenda, and Mr. Kenney, his longstanding social conservative views notwithstanding has tried very carefully to walk this tightrope without dividing his coalition.

We know that anti-abortion groups, a core component of the UCP’s social conservative base, have been working hard to ensure their candidates dominate the party’s nomination process. Political observers agree this effort has been a success, although no one seems to be sure just how much of one.

Are the social conservatives behind that effort worried Mr. Kenney’s political pragmatism will override his traditional support for their values?

Forcing Mr. Kenney to choose might not be a bad strategy for a resurgent social conservative right at a moment like this, especially if their calculation is correct that the election is a sure thing for their party.

Surely Mr. Carpay is too smart to have said this without thinking through the potential risks and benefits. Calls for his removal are being heard again from LGBTQ activists and progressive Albertans, including progressive Conservatives. So, WWJD? (What Will Jason Do?)

It’s an interesting question.

4 Comments to: What was John Carpay’s goal when he in effect withdrew his apology for comparing Pride flags to swastikas?

  1. David Harrigan

    February 11th, 2019

    Jason will be unavailable for comment.

  2. David

    February 12th, 2019

    Did Mr. Carpay have his fingers crossed behind his back when he made his prervious apology?

    Being deceitful sure doesn’t seem like a very Christian thing to do, even if it is in service of a larger cause, perhaps Mr. Kenney should also take note. It may be hard for a rich man to enter heaven, but it is not easy for a pinnochio either.

    I have a feeling the original apology was forced and now that boss Kenney is preoccupied with other things, Carpay feels confident to again speak freely. Maybe supressing bozo eruptions is not so easy after all. Sometimes one has to keep as much of an eye on ones friends as on ones enemies. Unless he has eyes in the back of his head, Kenney might be having a bit of a hard time keeping an eye on everyone right now.

  3. Jerrymacgp

    February 13th, 2019

    “Fundamental Freedoms”? Really? What about the “fundamental freedom” to live in safety, free of fear of being beaten up, of being bullied or harassed, or being fired or evicted without just cause, all because of whom one loves? Those are the challenges lived by LGBTQ2S+ people around the world; although Canada is one of the less dangerous places in the world to be different—we don’t execute people for being gay—LGBTQ2S+ people in Canada still face discrimination and hate.


Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)