Jason Kenney as depicted during his Brexit Moment (Image: Press Progress).

Back in June 2016, hours after Britons had narrowly voted to leave the European Union, a lot of Albertans scratched their heads at Jason Kenney’s bizarre Brexit commentary on social media.

At the time, Mr. Kenney was still drawing a paycheque as the Conservative MP for Calgary Midnapore. He was known, however, to be eyeing a run for the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta as the first step in a plan to bring Alberta’s still-disunited conservative parties together.

British Prime Minister Theresa May (Photo: Wikimedia Commons).

His thoughts on the Brexit vote seemed strange because they were radically at odds with the position taken on international trade agreements by the federal Conservative Party at least since Brian Mulroney was prime minister, and certainly under the leadership of Mr. Kenney’s former boss and mentor Stephen Harper.

Today the Conservative government of Prime Minister Theresa May is teetering as the United Kingdom ponders which dire way to leave the EU. It’s obvious to all now that this is going to end badly.

Meanwhile, here in Alberta, Mr. Kenney struggles to find a way to make the United Conservative Party appear inclusive and progressive while continuing to harbour the extremist social conservatives who are its most loyal and active members.

Immediately after Brexit, I tied together the threads of what one would have expected Mr. Kenney’s position on that catastrophe to be and his strategic calculations in the post below. While Brexit is now a term familiar enough to no longer require quotation marks, what’s happened since has done little to cast doubt on the rest of this analysis.


Jason Kenney’s bizarre ‘Brexit’ broadsides: The explanation is in the dog-whistle

There was head scratching and puzzled disapproval on social media Thursday night at Jason Kenney’s seemingly bizarre Twitter celebration of Britain’s unanticipated “Brexit” vote, many unhappy returns of which are yet to be enumerated.

Responses from across the political spectrum ranged from perplexed to angry when the former Harper Government cabinet minister and rumoured candidate for the leadership of Alberta’s Progressive Conservative Party – channeling Nigel Farage, Brexit advocate and leader of the crypto-fascist U.K. Independence Party – Tweeted, “Congratulations to the British people on choosing hope over fear by embracing a confident, sovereign future, open to the world!”

Never mind that there isn’t really a British people, the U.K. being a united kingdom and all that, this was seen as peculiar coming from a man who is nowadays being touted as a future leader of a jurisdiction that depends desperately on international trade to prosper, and perhaps even to survive.

Former Ukip leader Nigel Farage (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

The Canadian province of Alberta, with an economy based heavily on the petroleum industry, is undergoing relatively hard times from low oil prices and a lack of access to foreign markets. So one might have thought Mr. Kenney would have been more cautious in his remarks on this sensitive topic, whatever his private views might be.

On the contrary, however. Faced with the wonderment and disapproval of his social media critics – “I’m speechless,” said former Alberta PC deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk, about whom Mr. Kenney has a famously nasty opinion; “This is remarkably ill-judged,” exclaimed Postmedia bloviator-in-chief Andrew Coyne – Mr. Kenney fired back with both barrels and kept it up with a stream of Tweets reiterating the same point.

But it would be a mistake to assume Mr. Kenney didn’t know exactly what he was doing when he sent that Tweet, and the ones that followed.

The man, after all, is a master dog-whistle politician – the term of art for demagogues who send silent messages between their spoken lines to stoke their supporters’ fury and hatred. And, have no doubt about it, Mr. Kenney’s red-meat base here in Alberta is full of rage worthy of the angriest Brexit supporter.

So why would a politician who has been a tireless advocate of “free trade” deals like the NAFTA, the Trans Pacific Partnership and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the EU, all of which tend to chip away at Canada’s national sovereignty, be a big supporter of a foreign group that wanted to end Britain’s membership in the European Union on the grounds it was chipping away at the U.K.’s sovereignty?

National Post columnist Andrew Coyne (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

The answer, one suspects, lies in the subtext of the Brexit debate, and in particular the arguments advanced by the far-right, xenophobic Ukip, as Mr. Farage’s party is commonly known.

The Brexit movement, as Doug Saunders of the Globe and Mail summed it up bitterly, “despite being the product of an extreme-right leader whose party holds one seat, despite being rejected by the leader of every conventional political party, despite having descended into use of racial-terror images of brown-skinned hordes as its central argument, despite its more zealous followers resorting to the assassination of a sitting member of Parliament, managed to prevail.”

In other words, the “Leave” side’s principal argument came to be characterized by many of the EU’s British opponents’ racial, religious and cultural hatreds. And the outcome of the Brexit campaign suggests this approach is highly effective.

Therein lies Mr. Kenney’s dog whistle. His supporters know what they have in mind when he Tweets to one of his interlocutors: “I respect the decision of the British people who will be unencumbered to pursue more global free trade & non-EU migration.”

And, like Mr. Farage’s supporters across the pond, they are not displeased to see their potential leader signalling his support for their ugly view of the world, even if he insists to the rest of us he meant something else.

In this particular case, who knows for sure? It’s all just vague enough that maybe the only thing he really meant was that the British should be unencumbered by the human rights and labour mobility provisions of the European Union, which in fairness do not tend to be features of the corporate rights treaties masquerading as free trade deals favoured by Mr. Kenney and his party.

This kind of silent dog-whistling, though, is nothing new for Mr. Kenney. Indeed, it’s among his go-to techniques.

Consider, in the recent past:

  • His “corrosive” social media misrepresentation of an Islamic religious ceremony.
  • His accusation that “people like” Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi were “politicizing” the niqab controversy his own party had ginned up for political purposes during the 2015 federal election.
  • His Tweet suggesting Indigenous people are just “settlers” too.
  • His characterization of “perfect, unaccented English” as an essential quality of being Canadian.
  • His catcalls in Parliament mocking the minister of national defence’s manner of speaking by demanding “English-to-English translation.”

Each one is wholly offensive. Each one is perfectly deniable. The man has become, in the phrase of Michael Stewart of Rabble.ca, “basically Canada’s greatest troll.”

The sotto voce message to those in the know, reminiscent of the Nixonian Southern Strategy, is: Shhhh … I’m your guy.

Well, one thing’s for sure, as yet another Tweeter said Thursday, with attitudes like these, Mr. Kenney has obviously lost interest in running for the leadership of the federal Conservatives. That’s not necessarily very reassuring if you care about Alberta, its reputation in the rest of the country, and the world.

Join the Conversation


  1. Starting with Brexit, I think there are three possible scenarios which I think are all about equally likely at this time – a “hard” Brexit (disastrous for the economy), a “soft” Brexit (disastrous for Brexiters, as this is not what they wanted) and no Breixt – a retreat from the abyss, perhaps prompted by an election/change of government and another referendum, basically asking UK voters do you really want to delete this? Two of these three scenarios are disastrous for Brexiters, which explains despite their huge dislike for May’s soft Brexit inclinations, they are not booting her out quite yet as that could lead to the third scenario, which is even worse for them.

    Whipping up political anger and discontent sometimes works in the short term, but not always so well in the long run. It’s harder to build that wall and make Mexico pay for it than it is to say you will do it. Its easy to promise Brexit will be painless, but when it starts to become apparent the process is a chaotic mess, it is possible the voters anger and discontent will turn on those who made promises it is becoming clear they can not keep.

    Meanwhile back in Alberta, Jason Kenney is still promising to somehow magically get pipelines built and that Albertans will pay no carbon tax. If he is smart, as opposed to just politically clever in the short run, he might want to look at how things are going for Doug Ford and rethink his approach. The elimination of carbon pricing has increased Ontario’s deficit considerably and this is one part of the deficit he can not blame on his predecessor. I suspect the Ontario government will probably spend the next several years making cuts to offset it – long after his carbon tax crusade is forgotten and closer to the next election, voters will be unhappy about the resulting cuts to schools, roads, hospitals and just about everything else the Ontario government supports.

    Easy promises are the populist recipe for short term gain, but perhaps long term pain to somewhat revise how the old saying goes.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.