PHOTOS: Alberta Liberal Leader David Khan, who is worried about the activities of the province’s Political Action Committees. Former premier Ed Stelmach is visible behind him. Below: Progressive Conservative Leader Jason Kenney, whose party’s activities are supported by PACs, and a United Farmers of Alberta gas station in Lacombe, grabbed from the UFA Archives online.
It’s hard to fault Alberta Liberal Leader David Khan for his call on the provincial government to quickly do something to control the burgeoning use in this province of U.S.-style “Political Action Committees” to get around the province’s election spending laws.
Mr. Khan, chosen as leader of the Alberta Liberals earlier this month, hit the ball out of the park publicity-wise last week with a news release demanding Alberta’s NDP Government “introduce strict regulations for political action committees to stop unscrupulous fund-raising.” He pointed, specifically, to PACs run for Jason Kenney, leader of the Progressive Conservative Party, and by former PC Party president Katherine O’Neill, who for the moment is a leader of the Disaffected Progressive Conservative Not-Quite-a-Party.
This turned out to generate loads of positive publicity for the Alberta Liberals, more than a political observer might have expected for a party with no recent history in government, an unelected novice leader and only one MLA in the Legislature, who is about to retire.
The fundamental reason for this is probably that a lot of people sense Mr. Khan is right, and something has gone seriously wrong with the use of PACs, in particular by conservative groups, but inevitably by others as well, to get around a well-intentioned law seen as necessary by most Albertans. I suppose it doesn’t hurt either that he passingly resembles movie actor George Clooney.
A significant part of the problem the Liberal Leader identified is the arrival in Canada of another pernicious American political innovation – the permanent campaign state.
Nationwide and in each province, the political system is now in campaign mode, 365 days a year, year after year. This was encouraged by the Harper Government during its long and dreary rule in Ottawa, and it’s a particular problem in NDP Alberta, where so many embittered Harperistas have retreated to plot their return to national power.
As a result, election financing reforms like those passed by Ed Stelmach’s PC government and Rachel Notley’s New Democrats that restrict most forms of election-spending regulation to the period between the drop of the writ and election day are quaint at best and potentially dangerously ineffective.
That said, to give the author his due, Colby Cosh was entertaining while making fun of Alberta political institutions like the Wildrose Party for facing the fate of becoming not much more than PACs themselves – which is better than what happened to the United Farmers of Alberta, a party that once ruled Alberta and is now a chain of commercial gas stations where you might also be able to wash your car and buy a freezie.
Nowadays, with Mr. Kenney swinging his substantial political weight around, the election-financing scene here is actually in danger of becoming more like Chicago in the 1920s!
If there’s a sound complaint to be had with Mr. Khan’s call for action, it’s only that he hasn’t really provided any indication beyond the broad strokes of what he has in mind.
The Liberal Party news release says he is “proposing strict regulations, including the banning of corporate and union donations to PACs, setting donation limits, and making donations to PACs above $250 and PAC expenditures transparent to the public.” In addition, though not in the news release, the Liberals have called for prohibiting out-of-province donations to PACs.
That’s all good. But not explained, for example, are important details like how to define PACs, and how to prevent political operators like Mr. Kenney’s supporters from just setting up non-PAC PACs to get around the next set of rules.
But when I asked the party if it could flesh out how this might work, an official told me that “our policy team is currently working on further details to these fundamental proposals and they will be made available in due course.”
This suggests they didn’t really expect such a positive reaction for their news release. Well, as we’ve learned in Alberta, small parties can become big governments overnight. Mr. Khan would be smart to do that work before making policy announcements if he wants to be taken really seriously.
That said, his fundamental point is well taken. If we don’t do the work as a society to control political spending and make its sources transparent in more than just the formal period after an election writ is dropped, we will miss the train before it chugs out of the station!