PHOTOS: B.C. Green Party Leader Andrew Weaver (CBC photo), who seems to have found his tiny three-member caucus holding the balance of power in the province’s Legislature. Below: B.C. Premier Christy Clark (Wikimedia Commons: Kris Krug), Alberta Premier Rachel Notley, B.C. NDP Leader John Horgan, and B.C. Lieutenant Governor Judith Guichon.
If a majority Liberal government in British Columbia would have been mildly good news for Rachel Notley’s Alberta NDP, and a majority NDP government would have only been mildly bad, a Liberal minority propped up by the B.C. Green Party may be the worst of all possible likely options.
As of this morning, Premier Christy Clark’s Liberals had been elected in 43 of the province’s 87 ridings, one short of a majority, the NDP led by John Horgan had 41 seats, and the Green Party led by Andrew Weaver held the balance of power with three seats.
It’s potentially bad news for the Alberta NDP because, in their heads if not their hearts, officials in Premier Notley’s government already knew they could work with Premier Clark on the pipelines-to-tidewater file, success on which is apparently politically essential in Alberta whether or not world market conditions actually justify development of such infrastructure.
So while Albertans who bleed orange may have hoped atavistically for an NDP Government in Victoria, a Liberal Government likely meant smoother sailing when it came to making the argument that seeking “social license” for oil sands exports via pipeline was working, thereby creating a chance to persuade Alberta voters that only the NDP can ensure a healthy export environment for Alberta.
Still, at least in such circumstances Alberta Dippers shared a language and tradition with their B.C. brethren, as well as many friendships and common goals that might have made compromise on oil exports possible. On other files, two such governments could have worked together effectively, and having a second NDP provincial government in Canada would also have relieved the Notley Government of the pressure of being the lightning rod for opposition to social democratic government in Canada.
But a Liberal government propped up by support from three Green members? Ms. Clark – or whoever leads the Liberals as soon as she’s stepped aside as leader – will not compromise on some things, but, let’s face it, the Alberta premier’s priorities, or Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s for that matter, are not likely to be at the top of Ms. Clark’s post-election to-do list.
Indeed, it’s unlikely but not impossible, given the enmity up to now between the two parties, that an NDP-Green coalition could emerge in the event Ms. Clark flatly rejects Green Leader Weaver’s core demand for getting corporate and union donations out of election financing laws. Mr. Weaver has already hinted in his first post-election remarks – by omission, at least – that the Greens’ demand for meaningful electoral reform, viz., some form of proportional representation, is now not as high a priority as he made it sound before the election.
But if the recounts result in no changes, the B.C. Greens will have to answer some immediate and serious strategic questions.
Mr. Weaver, of course, can comfort himself with the thought that not very long ago, Ms. Notley too was a member of a caucus small enough (to risk a legacy metaphor) to meet in a telephone booth.
Someone else who may soon face an unusual challenge is B.C. Lieutenant Governor Judith Guichon, who could have some vice-regal work to do for once if the several recounts expected result in changes. Note that this is unlikely, as recounts usually reinforce the initial result.
Unless the numbers align more favourably after the recounting and the B.C. NDP can work out a coalition deal with the Greens – which is not likely more because of sentiment than policy differences – Ms. Guichon is almost certain to ask the Liberals to form a government first, even if the seat count edges a little closer in the next few days.
The Liberals, after all, led slightly in the popular vote, formed the previous government and are likely to have marginally more seats once the dust has settled.
Meanwhile, back in Alberta, whether or not Rachel Notley faces an optimal situation to the west, we can assume she will continue to conduct business in her usual sunny and coolly competent manner.
As for Alberta’s conservative Opposition parties, they will continue to have no ideas at all of how to overcome hostility in B.C. to Alberta’s infrastructure demands other than blunt force, or about low world petroleum prices beyond fatuous claims about the superiority of Alberta oil. Whether or not that will be good enough for Alberta voters in 2019 remains to be seen.
This post also appears on Rabble.ca.
I certainly agree the election result in B.C. does not bode well for Alberta’s desire to build a new pipeline to tidewater.
As for “social licence”. In the 2013 election, the Green Party got 8% of the popular vote. In this election, they got over 16% of the popular vote. The NDP went from 39.2 to 39.9% and the Liberals dropped just over 3%. Both the Green’s and the NDP were strongly opposed to the building of the Kinder Morgan pipeline. This election result shows that public opinion in B.C. is increasingly against pipeline developement and that all this political bafflegab about our Premier acquiring “social licence” with her climate leadership policy is nothing but an illusion. The application of the carbon tax in Alberta is doing nothing but increasing the cost of heating my home and driving my car.
While I agree the recent BC election results appear to be troubling for Alberta, I think this is exactly the moment for us to Stay Calm and Carry On.
First, all the votes are not yet counted and some of the results are very close, so we do not know the final outcome yet. Second, the pipelines issue was already decided by the Federal government and they are the ultimate decision makers on this issue, not the province of BC. I don’t think either the BC Liberals or the BC NDP want to make it their big issue, although they may make some sympathetic noises on the issue to appeal to the Greens. Fortunately, it seems like the Greens’ main interest now is electoral/political finance reform. Third, as noted minority governments do not tend to last a long time. Yes, the Greens may have the once in a lifetime opportunity to finally get the government to do some things that they want, but only part of their platform is politically palatable to either the BC Liberals or the BC NDP. Once, that is part done (perhaps in a year or so) then there will probably be another election in BC.
Fellow Albertans above all, Stay Calm and Carry On. Any gnashing and wailing from this side of the mountains will probably not even be noticed in BC now anyways, they are kind of very preoccupied with their own situation. Politics sometimes seems to be about the short term, but good government is also about the long term and the current situation in BC is one that will likely soon pass.
poor bc-ers so badly has been brainwashed, they can’t even choose what is best for them.
seems like for Rachel Notley no other choices left but anschluss of BC and establish kind of status quo under slogan “ein fuhrer, ein volk, ein erdolleitung”:)
“poor bc-ers so badly has been brainwashed, they can’t even choose what is best for them.”
If Albertans are wondering why BC is so reluctant to assume the risk of oil spills for Alberta’s benefit, look no further than the above comment.
Leave a comment