PHOTOS: Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s tactics have sparked protests, but Conservatives who should know better have been astonishingly quiet. (CommonDreams.org photo.) Below: Former St. Albert MLA Mary O’Neill, Independent MP Brent Rathgeber and Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi.
ST. ALBERT, Alberta
The single most disheartening thing about this long 2015 federal election campaign has been the silence among influential Conservatives about Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s deplorable strategy of race baiting to create a wedge issue.
The prime minister rarely did this himself, of course, although his “old stock Canadians” crack came dog-whistle close. But no one with an ounce of sense can deny that the whole niqab brouhaha – self-evidently cynically generated by the Conservative Party’s foreign consultants and domestic backroom boys – was designed to do this.
It should not need to be said that such tactics deserve contempt and public disapprobation from all across the political spectrum. And yet, on the right, there has been very little said, and among Conservatives, almost nothing. This silence is unnerving.
Surely many of the fine, intelligent Conservatives I have known over many years know in their hearts their silence condemns them and their party. And I have known many such Conservatives, something I am sure almost all progressive readers of this blog can say as well – people with whom we disagree profoundly on economic or social policies, but who are consistent, honourable and thoughtful in their conservative principles.
So where are they, these “good Conservatives” with whom we can usually find some common ground? Or, rather, now that the election campaign is all but over, where were they?
Surely one or two Canadians who still have influence in the Conservative Party of Stephen Harper would have had the courage to speak up about this hateful strategy!
But apparently not. At least, I can say I have heard virtually nothing from the many former Conservative provincial and federal office holders in my community. And I haven’t heard anything to suggest the situation is different anywhere else. We can only hope they have forcefully spoken up, at least, in the private chambers of their party.
I can think of six former elected representatives at all levels of government whom I know personally in my own community, and whom I have always thought of as fine people despite our different views of the world. But not one has spoken out to condemn this. Can we really see the world that differently?
“Our sitting prime minister has consistently tried to steer the election discourse to other important topics,” wrote Mary O’Neill, former MLA for St. Albert, in Saturday’s edition of the Gazette. “It is incorrect to think he is the one who has made this an election issue. … To a great extent, the other parties and the reporting media – and, I might add, the niqab-wearing women along with their lawyers – are the ones who have either made it or described it as an election issue.”
Are we seriously being asked to blame the victims, and a couple of lawyers? Remember, the prime minister himself promised to introduce a ban on niqabs in public service offices – a practice for which there is now and ever shall be precisely zero demand!
Influential Canadian Conservatives may not recognize this campaign for what it is, but the rest of the world sure seems to. Even The Economist, the intellectual voice of globalized conservatism, called the prime minister’s campaign “Muslim bashing.”
A headline in The Guardian, meanwhile, a more liberal British newspaper, said Canadian Conservatives “use Islamophobia to make gains in polls.” Britain’s Independent newspaper characterized the Conservative campaign as one of “dark, racist overtones and anti-Muslim rhetoric.” The Broadbent Institute’s Press Progress online publication has compiled a longer list, from which these examples are drawn, of how the world sees the Conservatives’ campaign tactics.
In a blog post last spring, Mr. Rathgeber accused the prime minister of “playing a dangerous game by attempting to capitalize on the politics of fear.” The “entire niqab issue,” he wrote, “is only being brought in as part of a larger, unhelpful campaign of fear and divisiveness between different groups of Canadians.” (I have added the italics in this passage.)
Mr. Rathgeber condemned this divisive strategy again at a recent all-candidates’ meeting when the Conservative candidate in the St. Albert-Edmonton Riding, Michael Cooper, tried unsuccessfully to scare the bejeepers out of the crowd with suggestions jihadists are lurking everywhere.
In this, Mr. Rathgeber echoes the words of Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi – not a Conservative, but hardly a radical leftist either – when he called Mr. Harper’s campaign “disgusting” and “unbelievably dangerous stuff.” For courageously speaking this obvious truth, Mayor Nenshi was accused by Defence Minister Jason Kenney, in typical Conservative fashion, of being the one who was politicizing the issue.
As for the many silent Conservatives, it says something about the hold Mr. Harper now has over that once-great Canadian political party that so many of its loyal supporters, even some who have hung on from the days when it truly was a conservative party and not the extremist market fundamentalist ideological front it has become, would exhibit such cowardice. And, sorry, if you know better and still say nothing, there’s just no other word for it but cowardice.
Well, the election is all but over. Perhaps some of good Conservatives will speak up now. They still need to. This is a problem within the Conservative Party that’s not going to go away just because we’ve had an election, whatever the outcome. It’s become bigger than just Mr. Harper, and only Conservatives can get their own house in order.
This post also appears on Rabble.ca.
Were you making an analogy to “good Germans” ?
If he is, it’s eminently justifiable.
“Nothing is unannounced. If you are paying attention, stuff comes down the pike.
First a little wave, then a medium wave, then the tsunami.”
Where were the good Conservatives when they started the systematic burning of books? They did not even have the courage to do it in public. Instead they followed the same cowardly template they used when they seized control of the Canadian Wheat Board from farmers.
First they fired the librarian (s) so nobody was around to keep track of things.
Then they told staff to take whatever they wanted.
Then a few chosen academics were invited in to salvage a bit more.
You can read about the most recent book burnings here http://www.cwbafacts.ca/2015/08/burning-bridges-to-the-future/ and at the end of the article are links to other sources of information on this.
These book burnings were of mostly irreplaceable and unique scientific papers from the previous 120 years of research. Anyone who has done any academic work at all has relied on this material for background and context. The vast majority of it was not saved. It is absolutely lost, and this is absolutely inexcusable.
And hardly anyone evens knows it happened, and is happening.
great article! what you say badly needs to be said. i could smell crosby all over the niqab thang from down here in australia. i wouldn’t put old stock canadians past him either. i’ll refrain from giving full vent to my thoughts about that man out of respect for you & your readers; sufficient to say i loath & despise him and everything he stands for. it would be great to see australia further isolated at paris later this year. -alfred venison, an edmontonian canuck in queen elizabeth’s australia.
Naheed Nenshi was featured in the G&M on Saturday with an article about the politics of division that the Harper Cons were using as their main weapon in this (almost endless) campaign.
Divided, Canada stands to lose what makes it great
I think that’s what I hated the most about the Con campaign – the attempt to shatter the country into warring factions and then to take control of the largest small fragment.
Canada even made it on to the BBC news this morning. I can’t really remember Canadian elections being terribly important to other parts of the world before. All those articles from the U.K. and the U.S. as well as publications with an international distribution must have put us on the radar.
So, now we wait…
The good conservatives are the only true conservatives. With Stephen Harper. Michael Cooper. And against mortgaging our future for stupid hospital upgrades…
Well, it looks like Harper is gone (I hope). I want to thank all the Dippers for giving it a good shot and especially Rachel Notley and Thomas Mulcair for getting us in the game. My only proviso is: could we please from now on just stick to our principles?
Leave a comment