Terrible optics: Connecting the dots to Jim Prentice’s sweet little T-Bird

Posted on January 21, 2015, 12:45 am
9 mins

PHOTOS: Jim Prentice bids on a classic T-Bird in Arizona and misses the symbolism of the moment entirely. Well, what did you expect? Below, a classic 56 Ford Thunderbird, similar to the one purchased by the premier.

On its own, the story about Premier Jim Prentice’s $59,400 classic car auction payout in Arizona, at the tail end of a government business trip to Texas, is not much more than a curiosity worthy of a chuckle or two about how some people just don’t seem to get the obvious.

Yes, the optics seem terrible at a time when Albertans are being told they’ll have to tighten their belts because of the plummeting price of oil, all the more so if you ask me when it’s revealed our One Percenter premier bought the white and baby blue ’56 T-Bird as an eventual gift to his grandson.'56_Ford_Thunderbird

The furious insistence of the premier’s supporters that he should be able to spend his banking bazillions as he wishes – notwithstanding the kid-glove treatment the story got from the media – tells me they know in their hearts it won’t pass the sniff test with most Albertans, even though, of course, he used his own money.

For his part, presumably, the premier is thinking: “What? What?

Not that this will matter very much, seeing as Mr. Prentice has successfully decimated the Opposition with his notoriously successful raid on the Wildrose benches last month. We are left to imagine wistfully what Danielle Smith would have done with such an opportunity were she still the Opposition leader.

But this example of the premier’s occasional cognitive dissonance about how such things are likely to be seen is part of a larger pattern, and the dots deserve to be connected, if not for Albertans, then for the rest of Canada.

We were told when Mr. Prentice came aboard as Progressive Conservative premier after the appalling Alison Redford episode that the province was “under new management.” It appeared that God was again in his heaven and all was right with the world. Most of the Wildrose Opposition certainly accepted that argument – or, at least, were instructed by someone to do so.

And yet, if you were looking for evidence that the same old arrogant and entitled ways persisted, Mr. Prentice’s sneaky departure from Texas for Arizona (his itinerary was written in a manner that gave the impression he was heading home, without actually saying he was) and his apparent assumption no one would pay attention to what he was doing there, is all you need.

In a symbolic way, what the T-Bird episode and the reaction to it illustrate is that optics don’t really matter in Alberta because we barely have a functioning democracy here. We haven’t had a change in government for 43 years, despite far more striking evidence than this small episode that the PCs Mr. Prentice now leads haven’t really been up to the job for the past three decades.

Both the managerial incompetence typical of generations of Tory provincial governments and the premier’s insensitivity to the optics of democracy are made more likely by a petroleum fuelled economy that generates huge amounts of cash for some people but is subject to the brutal whims of the market.

In such circumstances, something as obvious as not asking citizens to make sacrifices for the common good the same week you publicly buy extravagant luxuries barely registers with the buyers as inappropriate, or even mildly incongruous.

Meanwhile, we have a federal government dominated by Alberta Conservatives whose apparent plan is to turn the entire Canadian economy into an oil-dependent  replica of Alberta’s.

This is bad for people in Central and Eastern Canada who depended on a healthy manufacturing sector for their livelihoods, but it’s good for the federal government’s friends in the oil industry back home in Calgary.

“Dutch Disease” in Canada? The diagnosis was pretty well confirmed last fall when even the Bank of America proclaimed that Alberta’s petroleum and its effects on the Looney were hurting the rest of the economy, never mind the federal Conservatives’ fury when NDP Opposition Leader Thomas Mulcair dared to suggest the same thing a few months before.

Now Mr. Prentice is busy trying to sell Canadians the bill of goods that the decline in the price fetched by oil and its resulting downward pressure on the Canadian dollar is a problem for everyone in the country.

Well, maybe. That would depend on how far Mr. Harper’s destructive plans have progressed. “Free” trade and Conservative petro-policies have pretty well laid waste to Ontario’s manufacturing sector, and it’ll take more than a few weeks of cheap gas and a low Canadian dollar to return it to viability.

Indeed, Statistics Canada reported yesterday that the slide in Canadian manufacturing continues, thanks in significant part to the pumped-up petro-dollar Mr. Prentice and Mr. Harper so desperately want to preserve.

“Manufacturing sales declined 1.4 per cent in November to $51.5 billion, reflecting lower sales of motor vehicles, chemicals, primary metals and food,” the federal statistics agency and Conservative bête noir reported. “This was the third decrease in four months.” Sales declined in 16 of 21 industries, Statscan noted, explaining this represented more than 80 per cent of total Canadian manufacturing.

Under such circumstances, Mr. Prentice’s bleat to the Rest of Canada that they’d better get in line with Alberta’s need to pump oil and pump the currency seems a bit rich. Suddenly all of Canada has a big problem because the government of Alberta, of all places, hasn’t figured out that commodity prices go up and down, and has proved to be completely incapable of planning for such an eventuality?

Mr. Harper’s government is in such a panic, meanwhile, that they’ve delayed their election budget for a couple of months in hopes oil prices will rise enough to let them claim there’s a surplus in spite of their costly and discriminatory income-splitting scheme. Heaven only knows what they’ll do if that doesn’t work out!

If something doesn’t happen soon, they surely fear, their whole dream of turning the country into a Thatcherite dystopia using Alberta-style taxes to justify public service cuts, all financed by the cash flow from petroleum, then running the place for the next 43 years or so, could be blown to smithereens!

If they succeed, of course, they can buy T-Birds and Rolexes for their grandkids to their hearts’ content while they tell the other 99 per cent of us to settle down in the barber’s chair for the inevitable series of lousy haircuts to which there is no alternative.

No one will even raise an eyebrow.

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

9 Comments to: Terrible optics: Connecting the dots to Jim Prentice’s sweet little T-Bird

  1. Athabascan

    January 21st, 2015

    We will inevitably hear from the apologists who claim this is his money and he can do what he wants with it. He worked hard for it, blah. blah….

    Those people are missing the point. Here’s the point that you so eloquently made: As is always the case when the top one-percenters claim we are all in this together, the fact is that we are not. Their lame attempts at building esprit de corp is nothing more than a ruse. It really means YOU get a haircut, but not I.

    The T-Bird story is not about a rich guy buying a T-Bird. It’s really about a Premier saying that WE (99%) must suffer, while HE and his friends aren’t. Same old same old. Does anyone believe the pain will be shared? I dare say the top one-percenters will thrive during this Alberta recession, while the rest of us bite the bullet.

    If the rich and the oil industry paid their fair share, there would be no recession in Alberta no matter how low the oil temporarily drops.

    Reply
    • Ted

      January 22nd, 2015

      Athabaskan, you’re completely correct. We’re in it together means ‘we screw up and you pay the recovery costs’.

      Reply
  2. anonymous

    January 21st, 2015

    Trust those dirty godless commies at the Bank of America to mention ‘Dutch Disease’. There is no such thing – it’s a socialist plot to steal money from wealthy, law abiding, hard working job creators.

    And about that T-Bird. I think it might be a gift from Jim to Danielle to show his appreciation of her diligent efforts to keep the great neoliberal experiment alive.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK7DA0FliIs

    Reply
  3. ronmac

    January 21st, 2015

    Look on the bright side. JP could have just as easily dropped $200,000 on one of those gas guzzling muscle cars from the early 70’s. Which would have started all sorts of idle speculation that low oil prices are here to stay.

    BTW when that T-bird makes its maiden voyage on an Alberta road who’s going to be in the passenger seat? Danielle Smith?

    Reply
  4. Dave

    January 21st, 2015

    I find the most striking fact in the above article is that the same party has ruled Alberta for 43 years. We are in essence a one party state and certainly not a well functioning democracy. Each of the conservative premiers have had their own idiosyncrasies, some of which grated on the public more than others, but all of which at least hint at entitlement.

    The public did not seem to mind Ralph using government aircraft so he could smoke on the plane, but it did mind Allison Redford’s use of government aircraft to travel to vacation spots and ferry around family members. I suspect they will not mind too much if the new premier likes to occasionally buy expensive old cars, while telling us to live within our means. However, he would be wise to not use government aircraft for any of these buying trips. He should try stay away from nice private golf courses when financial heck is breaking loose (for those who remember one of Don Getty’s big mistakes).

    Sadly, I think part of being a one party state is that the public accepts a certain level of arrogance and entitlement from the leadership, whether they admit it or not. If that message makes us too uncomfortable, there is really only one way to change that and that is to change the party in power. It’s really is not that difficult, functioning democracies do it all the time.

    Reply
  5. Ryan

    January 21st, 2015

    It could’ve been worse though.

    Instead of blue and white he could’ve brought back a red Ford

    Reply
  6. beef

    January 21st, 2015

    Watch out for the pot holes on our Alberta roads Jimmy-boy, you wouldn’t want to damage that T-Bird while driving on our neglected infrastructure!

    Reply
  7. m alta

    January 22nd, 2015

    The compliant media (bought and paid for with tax dollars running useless government ads) doesn’t even bother to talk about the fact we paid for the trip. If this had been Redford, that is the headline.

    Reply
    • NJ

      January 23rd, 2015

      Actually, Malta, the Premier paid for his own travel expenses from Texas to Arizona, and from Arizona back to Edmonton. The initial flight to Texas was covered by the government, as he was there on government business.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)