Unelected Premier Jim Prentice and his appointed Health Minister Stephen Mandel held a news conference in Edmonton yesterday afternoon to demonstrate they’re doing something decisive about Alberta’s embarrassing “bed blocker” problem and, no doubt, aid both their by-election campaigns on Oct. 27.
This has been going on since Ralph Klein was premier. Now, however, we have another politically embarrassing health care meltdown at a rather delicate moment for Mr. Prentice’s PC “new management.”
And it’s not exactly a secret that the government’s determined emphasis on assisted living and cuts in long-term care beds has contributed directly to the huge backlog in hospital acute care wards, which in turn has increased wait times in Emergency Wards.
An embarrassing story in the Calgary Herald over the long weekend illustrated how this process works, and included new Alberta Health Services CEO Vickie Kaminski musing about how keeping the elderly poor from being admitted to acute care hospitals might be the answer.
She asked: “Is there a role that we can be to be able to provide better treatment options in the emergency departments so that they don’t just get admitted?”
Perhaps the government had a moment of clarity and realized how that sentiment might go over with the public if the message started to sink in.
But the message from the premier and health minister to the gathered media – which turned out in considerable numbers at the newser in the lecture theatre of the Royal Alexandra Hospital, notwithstanding a weekend Ebola scare in Edmonton – was less than clear, and short on details.
The PC candidates for Calgary-Foothills (Mr. Prentice) and Edmonton-Whitemud (Mr. Mandel) solemnly informed the media that the government would “open 464 continuing care spaces that are currently unfunded or unstaffed through the reallocation of existing resources.” (Emphasis added.)
Why that particular number was not fully explained. Presumably, it’s what they managed to come up with on short notice.
They also vowed at some indeterminate future date to “assist” some of the 700 patients said to be in acute care who really ought to be in long-term care “through $60 million in targeted Affordable Supportive Living Initiative funds,” and to reserve about 20 per cent of the beds freed up for exclusive use by Emergency Departments.
“We’re taking concrete steps to relieve pressure on Alberta’s hospitals by considering the flow of the overall system and effecting changes to help those who most need continuing care options,” Mr. Prentice said in his news release. (Emphasis added again.)
I’m afraid I’m not at all certain precisely what the premier had in mind with the bit about the flow of the overall system, other than, “calm down, people, everything is taken care of. Don’t forget to vote on Oct. 27.”
Regardless, the important thing was that this sounded decisive enough. Plus, Mr. Prentice made the point of telling reporters they were looking at a “hands on” health minister in Mr. Mandel, the kind of decisive guy who can get stuff done in a big fat hurry. (I thought the previous incumbent, Fred Horne, was pretty hands on too and decisive, especially when it came to dealing with Alberta Health Services Board members who were insufficiently co-operative. But there you go.)
On closer examination, however, Messrs. Prentice and Mandel seemed to be playing the same old bait ’n’ switch game of confusing “continuing care” (a murky term that could mean anything, private or public) with “long-term care” (a specific term set out in legislation and regulation that means a defined level of care).
The differences can be very important with registered nurses on staff, essential supplies and medicines, physician services, physiotherapy and transportation all provided in long-term care, and either unregulated or sold as high-cost extras to residents in other levels of care included under the mushy term “continuing care.”
Since committing to continuing-care beds is exactly what got us into the current mess in the first place, it’s hard to see how these changes are going to make things better.
The government’s news release, in Mr. Prentice’s preferred technocratic style, provided us with an impressive chart outlining how many beds will be opened, approximately when, and in what parts of the province.
But it seems almost certain that the government remains committed to making them the wrong kind of beds.
So at the end of the news conference, when the premier raced off to another engagement and Mr. Mandel hung around to skillfully field reporters’ questions, it wasn’t entirely clear underneath which walnut shell the bean was resting.
And it may be working, at least if the reports are true there’s a new public opinion survey out there suggesting Mr. Prentice and the hitherto troubled PCs are enjoying a nice honeymoon bounce with the public, polling only a point or two behind the Wildrose Party.
We’ll have a better idea of what this really means on Oct. 27, when we learn the results of the by-elections in Edmonton-Whitemud and Calgary-Foothills, as well as in Calgary-West and Calgary-Elbow, disgraced premier Alison Redford’s old riding where Mr. Prentice’s appointed Education Minister Gordon Dirks is running.
This post also appears on Rabble.ca.
David, I’m interested in ” “long-term care” (a specific term set out in legislation and regulation that means a defined level of care)” – where, please?
“Long-term care accommodations are nursing homes under the Nursing Homes Act or auxiliary hospitals under the Hospitals Act and can be run by for and not for profit organizations, or by Alberta Health Services. Individuals must be assessed and placed by Alberta Health Services.” – http://asalreporting.gov.ab.ca/astral/
See also: http://www.health.alberta.ca/services/continuing-care-system.html
Would that it were true – what you’ve referenced is a quote from a PR blurb on a government webpage. Beware also the qualifier re: “accommodations”.
ASAL reports only on the Accommodation Standards, which are included in the Supportive Living Licensing Act Regulations as Schedule 1, and which does not cover care or apply to nursing homes or auxiliary hospitals.
Interestingly, the confusion is furthered because the 2014 Long-Term Care Certification Application Form “will be used for the purposes of licensing supportive living and monitoring long-term care accommodations.”
I stand by my interpretation.
“…Alberta Health Services CEO Vickie Kaminski musing about how keeping the elderly poor from being admitted to acute care hospitals might be the answer.”
Bob: Bill, would you call that an anti-human statement?
Bill: Well Bob, I think anti-human might be a bit strong. I would call it anti-social.
Bob: Yeah, thanks Bill. I think you hit the nail on the head with that analysis.
The best solution would be to purchase low cost portable beds and place the sick elderly in the streets of Calgary and Edmonton. I’m certain that the portable bed industry could reap generous profits.
I couldn’t read the ‘bed blockers’ stoy through the CH paywall, nor one today about ‘U of C Expert says privatize more services’, the expert in question being Jack Mintz; but there is an ominous trend.
This CBC story about Landmark Education Corp. might explain some of the feelings of intimidation at AHS that people have mentioned over the years (Raj Sherman did, I think):
Not a cult, exactly, at least they sue people for calling them that; but rather unpleasant-sounding.
By any chance do you know if these 464 continuing care beds are new spaces, or are they part of the 982 “Affordable Assisted Living” spaces announced in 2012-13? http://www.health.alberta.ca/services/supportive-living-initiative.html
there’s a map and a list at http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Tories+announce+plans+continuing+term+care+beds+ease+emergency+room+pressure+with+video/10289228/story.html , which indicates most are re-designated existing or already-nearly-built spaces…
Leave a comment