The Firewall Five, prominent Western independantistes of another era, before they all started cashing in on their public pensions. Today, everything has changed, thank you very much, except the constant cries for tax cuts, austerity and means testing for old people. Below: the late Ralph Klein with one of the guys who sent him the Firewall Manifesto, which the premier wisely tossed in the trash can, one of his better moves.

Aren’t conservatives supposed to think means testing is a good thing?

In the language of modern conservatism – which is neither modern nor particularly conservative, in any normal sense of the word – “means testing” is a mechanism for denying social benefits to large groups of people because they’re purported to be too well off.

Of course, since modern conservatives set the threshold for “too wealthy” as low as they can get away with, the concept of means testing is really code for denying social benefits – or, in Conspeak, “entitlements” – to as many people as possible.

The justification, of course, is usually the need for continued austerity, keeping taxes “competitive,” yadda-yadda, although the true motive is normally “benefitting the truly entitled, the 1 per cent of entitlement, as much as possible.”

In the normal course of events, the Organized Right is always in favour of means testing if it can be used to deny benefits to anyone who not at the very top of the heap, just as it is always against the same principle if it’s used to calculate income taxes to be paid by those who have benefitted the most from society’s structure.

I mention this only in the context of those health care transfer program payments to provinces that the Alberta media is gloating about so gleefully nowadays.

Alert readers will note that thanks to the Alberta-dominated Harper Government in Ottawa, health care transfer payments have gone up by $1.03 billion to $3.75 billion this year here in the richest province in Confederation.

Everywhere else, it would seem, not so much, making it harder to afford national standards of public heath care. It’s an increase of 38 per cent for Alberta, in case you were wondering, compared with 0 to 4 per cent for provinces that didn’t win the oil lottery – which may also explain why we’re so darned persuaded out here this is how things should work.

The Harper Government promised everyone a 6-per-cent increase in health care transfer payments under the soon-to-expire Canada Health Accord this year, but since they’re giving almost all of it to the wealthiest jurisdiction – a new formula, don’t ya know – it’s not doing much good where it’s needed. But it will, presumably, shore up a few votes in the heartland, in case it’s been feeling a little neglected lately.

What this really illustrates, though, is the Harper Government’s penchant for giving the most money to the people who need it least – which, if you think about it, is also the driving motivation behind the conventional conservative position on means testing.

The fact that over the past few decades Alberta has gotten less back in health care transfers and other equalization payments than its residents paid in federal taxes has long been the cause of much whining among conservative rent-a-mouths around here. Never mind for the moment that we’ve all been paying the same rate of federal taxes, wherever in Canada we happened to live.

Back in the day, this was an extremely sore point with a certain group of well-known commentators, at least when they were not writing letters to the premier advocating that Alberta pull out of the Canada Health Act altogether and get no money at all from Ottawa, the better to sabotage public health care delivery everywhere else in Canada.

I speak of course of the authors of the famed Firewall Manifesto, penned in 2001 by such luminaries as Stephen Harper, Ted Morton and the recently rehabilitated Tom Flanagan, the best-known proselytizers of sovereignty association for the windy West.

In those days, in such western independentiste circles, equalization payments of any sort that went anywhere else were seen as harbingers of dependency, welfarism and the kind of “culture of defeat” Mr. Harper was ascribing to Atlantic Canada in 2002.

Of course, that was then and this is now, and now that Mr. Harper is prime minister of all the unequal little Canadas, and the unequalest Canada of all is getting a billion dollars more in health care transfers, the narrative about the need for a firewall has been toned down a little.

Today, indeed, one would think from the congratulatory tone of the local media, that God’s in his heaven, Ralph Klein is there with Him siting at His right hand, Ed Stelmach’s at last getting the credit he was due for constantly complaining about all our petro-dollars being hosed away on Quebec, Ontario and Atlantic Canada, and Alison Redford is taking credit for anything that’s left, thank you very much.

Indeed, if you listened to the local media out here, you’d think it was all a big joke, with unhappy Ontario getting its much-deserved comeuppance at last.

And what are we Albertans going to do with this embarrassment of riches? Who knows? Bigger bonuses for the top dogs in Alberta Health Services, perhaps?

Health care here remains in chaos, with local hospitals crumbling into Third World conditions, critically ill newborns flown out of town because there aren’t enough trained staff members to treat them, and lineups are so bad again in the province’s Emergency Rooms that officials have taken to fudging the numbers, so it doesn’t sound as if the promise of more cash has helped out all that much – not yet, anyway.

Nevertheless, now that the big bucks are going to the Former Firewallers’ sweet home Alabamberta, everything has changed.

Well, almost everything. Alberta seniors will soon be subject to a new means test for pharmaceutical drugs that will transfer $180 million in drug costs from the province onto the backs of the elderly and ill, leaving some with a choice between drug therapy or food.

And the provincial government continues to demand wage freezes for front-line health care workers.

But means tests for oil-producing provinces? Fuggedaboutit!

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. re: “the Organized Right … always against the same principle [means testing] if it’s used to calculate income taxes to be paid by those who have benefitted the most from society’s structure.”

    From Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, Sr. comments relevant to some heretical evidence (to the Organized Right lottery elites) on benefiting from societal assets held in common:

    excerpt: “One of the wealthiest men on the planet, Warren Buffett, with a current net worth of $60 billion, acknowledges that “society is responsible for a very significant percentage of what I’ve earned.”

    Bill Gates, Sr. agrees when he writes, “Success is a product of having been born in this country, a place where education and research are subsidized, where there is an orderly market, where the private sector reaps enormous benefits from public investment. For someone to assert that he or she has grown wealthy in America without the benefit of substantial public investment is pure hubris.”

    http://www.garalperovitz.com/unjust-deserts/

    Drawing on cutting-edge research as well as their knowledge of philosophy and economics, Alperovitz and Daly prove that up to 90 per cent ‘or even more of private earnings are the result not of individual ingenuity, effort or investment, but of what they describe as the “unjust” appropriation of our collective inheritance. In other words, the cumulative or aggregate knowledge that we all inherit is key to individual achievement.

    … if the market rewarded people according to their contributions it would make up only 10-20% of their income. The rich don’t work harder and are not morally justified in deservingness, or ‘deserts’ as philosophers describe it than the rest of us.”

    Sam Gunsch

  2. …and yet, the feeling of a downtrodden Alberta is alive and well and risen to absurd heights in the letters section of today’s National Post, where a put-upon reader from Edmonton complains that Alberta is still being hosed by those nasty easterners despite the fact that Alberta now controls the federal government.

    “…the [government] we have now is as Western as we will ever get and we have still not seen one ounce of relief from the economic burden of carrying the country”, the letter writer opines. Apart from the pure falsity of this claim (ask Ontario who pays the most) I wonder what the writer’s fellow westerners in B.C. and Saskatchewan would think about this claim that the rest of the country is riding on Alberta’s back.

    As much as I love my home province and its people, this kind of self-righteous whining makes me ill, especially in light of the windfall that Dave mentions in his column.

  3. Forgot to add the link to the National Post letter: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/02/14/todays-letters-better-approaches-to-public-health/

    You’ve got to read the letter to believe it!

    Turns out, the letter writer in one Sharon Maclise, a candidate for Edmonton city council in the last election who is not only not happy about ostensibly carrying the rest of Canada on her provinces back, but is also non to happy that Edmonton has elected a center-left mayor, according to her website.

  4. Curious to know why you neglect to mention what the new health payments include: a per-capita adjustment.

    I mean, it’s not like Alberta’s population growth rate is double, triple, sometimes quadruple other provinces (and that’s leaving out the Atlantic provinces). Over the several years since the 6% yoy rule was used that’s quite a lot of compounding demographic growth.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.