UCP leader demands by-election he likely doesn’t want; premier, presumably anxious to tie him down in House, is silent

Posted on October 31, 2017, 1:38 am
8 mins

PHOTOS: Jason Nixon, the UCP’s new House Leader. (Photo: Dave Cournoyer, Daveberta.ca.) Below: Alberta NDP Premier Rachel Notley, seatless UCP Leader Jason Kenney, former Wildrose leader Brian Jean in happier times, Deputy Premier Sarah Hoffman, Alberta Liberal Leader David Khan, and Alberta Party Leader Greg Clark.

Happy Halloween! Nothing is as it seems!

Now that he’s safely the leader of the United Conservative Party and has found an MLA willing to step aside for the good of the party, Jason Kenney is demanding that Premier Rachel Notley hop to it and get him a by-election so that he can take his place in the Legislature.

For the moment, Ms. Notley is maintaining a stately silence on the topic. However, according to the Globe and Mail, Deputy Premier Sarah Hoffman says her boss is thinking about it and will make a decision in the dispensation of the fullness of time – my words, not hers.

Regardless, it’s one of those oddities of politics that both Ms. Notley and Mr. Kenney are obligated to indicate they desire the opposite of what they almost certainly actually want to see happen.

The premier, who would surely like Mr. Kenney in the House sooner than later to keep him bogged down in Edmonton where her supporters can concentrate their metaphorical fire on his extreme social views, can’t appear to be knuckling under to the head UCPer’s demands.

The UCP leader, who needs to be on the road pressing the flesh and getting his troops fired up, has to appear ready to take the fight to the premier’s front yard, pretty much the last place he ought to be, strategically speaking.

So I’m sure Mr. Kenney’s fingers are crossed that he can goad Ms. Notley into waiting as long as possible to call the by-election.

Since it’s the government that gets to make the call – within a time limit of six months – I think we can expect a by-election sooner than later. However, aside from a willingness to look foolish if it turns out I’m wrong, I am not prepared to put my money where my mouth is.

Any riding whose voters were willing to elect Dave Rodney double the number of times he climbed Mount Everest is presumably not going to balk at electing Mr. Kenney their MLA in Calgary-Lougheed.

Then again, you never know. Alberta Liberal Leader David Khan, who like Mr. Kenney is seatless, will probably use the opportunity to get his name before voters too. No one is going to deny Mr. Khan is more charismatic than the new UCP leader, are they?

Kenny makes changes to UCP’s Legislative Caucus; more to come

Meanwhile yesterday, Mr. Kenney made a few changes, naming Rimbey-Rocky Mountain House-Sundre MLA Jason Nixon as House Leader in his absence, and assigning a few others caucus leadership positions. He will name legislative critics soon.

While the situation is slightly different now that the UCP has an official leader – just one who doesn’t have a seat in the House – this ends the short tenure of Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills MLA Nathan Cooper as interim UCP leader.

Mr. Cooper, well spoken and knowledgeable about Parliamentary procedure, is probably the sharpest knife in the UCP’s cutlery drawer. Mr. Nixon, once said to have been the highest-paid student society executive in Alberta, is not. He was, however, a Kenney loyalist in the recent leadership campaign.

As for Fort McMurray-Conklin MLA Brian Jean, the former Wildrose Party and Opposition leader defeated by Mr. Kenney for the top UCP job, the Edmonton Journal reported he didn’t make it to the party’s caucus meeting yesterday morning. The CBC said he looked as if he were choking back tears. So I wouldn’t advise placing any on Mr. Jean sticking around any longer than absolutely necessary.

Notwithstanding the rumour yesterday morning that Vitor Marciano, Mr. Jean’s loyal strategist who served as the UCP’s director of logistics, wanted to stay on the job, by this evening his name had disappeared from the government’s online directory.

By contrast, Strathmore-Brooks MLA Derek Fildebrandt – who quit to sit as an Independent after being caught renting his subsidized Edmonton apartment on Airbnb and being charged by Edmonton Police with leaving the scene of a minor traffic accident – is drifting back toward the centre of the UCP universe.

Mr. Fildebrandt, another Kenney loyalist, has pleaded not guilty to the charges. As for l’affaire Airbnb, no laws were broken. Expect him to be welcomed back to the UCP Caucus if he is found not guilty. A verdict in the traffic case is expected on Dec. 18.

Greg Clark to Alberta: Do as I say, not as I do

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

When Alberta Party Leader Greg Clark contemplated the efforts of former Wildrose Party leader Danielle Smith to roll her caucus in to premier Jim Prentice’s PCs in December 2014, he found he didn’t approve.

“The Alberta Party believes that in a parliamentary democracy, there’s a right way and a wrong way to cross the floor,” Mr. Clark said huffily in response to a question form students at Red Deer Lake School south of Calgary in a video that has now appeared on Youtube.

“When an MLA really disagrees with what their party is doing, they have the opportunity under our system to cross the floor,” Mr. Clark said. “But we believe the way that Danielle Smith and Wildrose did it … is the wrong way to do it.

“What should happen is the MLA should consult with their constituents and explain to them why they’re going to cross the floor. And give their constituents an opportunity in an open, public forum to provide feedback to that MLA as to why they should, or shouldn’t, cross the floor. When the conditions have been met, the MLA can cross the floor, and in our system they will have the opportunity at the next election to either vote for or against that MLA.”

Well, not much like that happened before Calgary-Mackay-Nose Hill MLA Karen McPherson, elected as a New Democrat in 2015, was welcomed to the Alberta Party Caucus by Mr. Clark yesterday after sitting as an Independent for a few days.

But, you know, that was then, and this is now.

5 Comments to: UCP leader demands by-election he likely doesn’t want; premier, presumably anxious to tie him down in House, is silent

  1. Greg Hooper

    October 31st, 2017

    This sentence needs work: “I wouldn’t advise placing any on Mr. Jean sticking around any longer than absolutely necessary.”

    And Ms. McPherson’s(?) picture is not showing up in the right spot.

    Otherwise a very informative article. Thanks!

    Reply
  2. David

    October 31st, 2017

    The Kenney demand for a by election as quick as possible is a bit of a power play on his part. Of course, he has no real say on when the by election is held, it is decided by the government.

    However, if the government calls the by election early, Kenney will claim credit for it. If it waits the full six months, he will accuse them of dragging their heels and being afraid of him. Probably the best the government can do in this situation is split the difference – call it not too soon, but not too close to the end of the six month period either. Late January 2018 or sometime in February might work well.

    Whenever it happens, I doubt that Kenney’s attendance record as an MLA will be the best. Some politicians get away with that – others really get slammed for it, like Michael Ignatief did. I suspect Kenney will particularly be away more when matters that are more controversial for him arise. It seems to be his pattern to hide away for a few days, until the issue he doesn’t want to respond to dies down.

    I have a feeling that Jean will be gone soon. I am not sure if that is just metaphorically, as an MLA who goes through the motions and is not around much or does not say much or he will actually resign. I lean somewhat towards the latter. If so, it might be prudent for the government to wait just a while before calling the by election Kenney supposedly so eagerly wants, as they might have to have more than one by election in the first part of 2018.

    Reply
    • Northern Loon

      November 1st, 2017

      Do you want to start taking dates for when Dear Departed Putative Leader AKA Brian Jean decides it is time to permanently leave? Whether you do or not, I choose February, 2018 as Brian becomes eligible for his MP’s pension when he turns 55. Brian celebrates the double nickle on February 3rd, so perhaps he will choose to announce his sudden desire to spend more time doing whatever Brian does when he is not representing his constituents on February 2nd. Groundhog day 2018 sounds just about right for a political opportunist.

      Reply
      • David

        November 2nd, 2017

        Sometime in February sounds good to me, so I won’t bet against it. Personally, I think Kenney is more the groundhog type, so I am going say after February 2.

        I don’t think Jean is hurting financially, so I don’t know how important the pension is to him financially, but it seems people don’t often turn things like that down, even most of the old Reform types that swore up and down that they never would take it. I don’t mind people getting fairly generous pensions as much as I mind hypocrisy.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)