Has St. Albert mayoral candidate Cam MacKay moved from opposition to a branch library to opposition to libraries?

Posted on September 06, 2017, 12:44 pm
9 mins

PHOTOS: A children’s reading event at the St. Albert Public Library, illustrating the level of partication in some of the library’s programs. (Photo: YesForTheLibrary.ca.) Below: Councillor Cam MacKay, who is running for mayor of St. Albert on a platform that prominently features opposition to a new branch library, and St. Albert Mayor Nolan Crouse, against whom Mr. MacKay had expected to run. (Photos: Cam MacKay Twitter account and Fort Saskatchewan Record).

ST. ALBERT, Alberta

Based on a social media post yesterday morning, St. Albert mayoral candidate Cam MacKay now appears to think public libraries are all but obsolete and ought to be shrinking, not growing.

Having made opposition to development of a branch library in St. Albert one of the few key policy planks in his campaign to replace Mayor Nolan Crouse, who is not seeking reelection, Mr. MacKay suggested in the Twitter exchange that libraries are heading toward technological extinction much like commercial video rental stores.

Never mind that the data suggest the opposite as libraries move into the digital era, with the addition of Internet, ebooks and other digital services among the changes that are bringing patrons in increasing numbers through the doors, literally, of Canadian public libraries.

Since 1984 in St. Albert, there’s been an increase of more than 1,000 per cent in program participation at the St. Albert Public Library, driven in part by an 84-per-cent increase in the city’s population. Library space, as is well known, is unchanged.

But such arguments find little sympathy among many of the core supporters of Mr. MacKay’s campaign, who in the social media forums they favour have shown increasing hostility toward library users, frequently dismissing them as elitists and members of a special interest group. If you disagree, you can’t argue with them in places like the so-called St. Albert “Citizens’ Coalition” section on Facebook, because dissenting voices, no matter how respectful, are swiftly excommunicated.

Still, Mr. MacKay’s Twitter exchange with a representative of T8N Magazine represents a troubling shift in the evolving positions taken by the candidate on the branch library in particular and the St. Albert Public Library’s services in general.

Back on Nov. 26, 2015 – along with Councillors Sheena Hughes and Bob Russell, often his sidekicks in opposition to Mayor Nolan Crouse and the rest of the current council – Mr. Mackay voted in favour of approving the branch library’s community charter, a key first step to building the facility at a time library supporters were working hard to build support for the project.

On Dec. 12, 2016, the three councillors joined the rest of council in unanimously approving funding to build the branch library.

And on April 18 this year, the three councillors again voted with the rest of council to give first reading to the branch library-borrowing bylaw, in which the budget envelope had been set foolishly high at close to $22 million for the $17.5 million expected to be required for the project.

But as St. Albert began to move into the season preceding the Oct. 16 municipal election, now drawing near, the campaign to replace current councillors with a hard-edged anti-spending council led by Mr. MacKay seemed to hit on the library as an issue around which to build a coalition that could win.

Despite the two councillors’ earlier votes, members of both Mr. MacKay’s and Ms. Hughes’ families were closely involved in a petition campaign last spring created to block the library funding bylaw.

In mid-June, city officials ruled the petition to be invalid, based on the number of signers whose signatures had not been properly sworn to be genuine by the activists who were gathering signatures. The actual validity of the approximately 6,700 signatures on the petition was never checked by city officials.

Later, councillors MacKay, Hughes and Russell all voted against the funding bylaw on second and third reading and successfully pushed for a plebiscite on the library as well as recreation facilities during the Oct. 16 election. Supporters of the library development argued the plebiscite was worded to encourage a no vote. Last night, city council voted to change the wording, excluding controversial cost estimates, a change that is certain to further inflame library opponents.

It was in the context of the plebiscite that yesterday morning’s back and forth on Twitter took place. It went like this:

T8N: “Quick question to council candidates. If the pleb says no to a library, at what pop level should we reach before we reconsider?”

Mr. MacKay: “Physical space needs should be declining per capita with technology. A second library should be based on location/access to current library”

T8N: “Ok, but, our pop has doubled, do we need only half the space? What if space is not avail near current loc? When is a good time for new lib?”

Mr. MacKay: “Replace library in your tweet with blockbuster video and let me know if you see my point about relevance of per capita”

It’s important, of course, to separate the plan to construct a new branch library from broader hostility to library services – the direction in which Mr. MacKay’s Tweet makes it appear he is moving.

It’s perfectly reasonable in a democracy for a municipal politician to take the position a new library is simply not affordable, or merely that it is not on the politician’s promised list of priorities. In the recent past, this seemed to be Mr. MacKay’s position.

But the rhetoric many of the library proposal’s opponents direct toward library supporters, and even library users, suggests Mr. MacKay’s campaign is tapping into quite something different here – a deep resentment among a small group of far-right activists that is not likely to contribute to a healthy community.

Beyond opposition to the branch library, anger about painted crosswalks, opposition to public transit, and strong personal antipathy to Mr. Crouse – against whom Mr. MacKay had expected to run – the campaign doesn’t yet seem to have much of a platform on many of the significant challenges facing the city.

As part of the MacKay campaign, an effort seems to be under way to rebuild the slate supported by the anonymous “St. Albert Think Tank” in the 2013 election.

Library users in St. Albert, regardless of their position on the branch development, are within their rights to wonder what Mr. MacKay actually now thinks the future of library services should look like in St. Albert.

And voters generally may want to ask themselves if Think Tank 2.0 is a group they want running St. Albert.

11 Comments to: Has St. Albert mayoral candidate Cam MacKay moved from opposition to a branch library to opposition to libraries?

  1. Bernie Veness

    September 6th, 2017

    Very well stated Mr. Mayor

    Reply
  2. Expat Albertan

    September 6th, 2017

    Painted crosswalks… why would anyone object to those?

    Reply
  3. Topiary

    September 6th, 2017

    So will MacKay & his like also oppose any institution I.e., schools, hospitals, etc based on their ill’logic’ model? Good grief, have they never ever considered how we go about building a democratic civil society?

    Reply
  4. St Albertan

    September 6th, 2017

    As much as I love your insight, I have must digress! How many millions of dollars will be spent to deliver nothing to no one in this post modern howl at the moon? If you’re lot win it’s a fail!

    Reply
    • Chris

      September 7th, 2017

      This comment underlines the need for libraries, if for no other reason so we can all learn how to use grammar and spelling tools built into most word processing programs. I’d also love to hear some clarification on what, precisely, a “post modern howl at the moon” is.

      Reply
  5. September 7th, 2017

    trying to slander the ONLY councillors –Hughes*** McKay*** Russell….that have a LICK of common sense?. Crouse is the most unethical mayor that a city has had the misfortune to elect! He has been caught “red handed” on many occasions.. and now you are SKEWING the words to fit your agenda. NEW Library to accommodate : dancing, bike repair classes, smurf wars, senior travel club, whist, and bridge clubs, health classes etc. WHY DID WE SPEND MONEY ON A UPDATED SENIORS CENTER? But hey… my spin of Tues meeting….. translated to these words… St AB has not had a major building in over FOUR years… so we MUST build the SECOND Wasteful building…. after all we ared still paying for the GREEN ELEPHANT. Some of you people are so stuck on your wants you forget the ACTUAL EXPENSES! A million $$$$$$ to operate ANOTHER facility … great cough up your RETIREMENT fund… I sure and the hell will not!

    Reply
    • MAGGIE

      September 8th, 2017

      Oh my goodness gracious, Edwards. Am I safe to assume that if there is something you yourself desire, it is a common sense need but if it is something someone else desires (or maybe even needs) it becomes a frivolous and wasteful want? Bless your heart.

      Reply
    • Kang

      September 8th, 2017

      Actually most public libraries are full of children, their young adult parents, and teenagers. Better treat them well Edward, they will be the ones who chose the type of nursing home you go into: either private and abusive or public and supportive – your choice.

      Who knows, you might even want to borrow a few books on history.

      Reply
  6. Dave

    September 7th, 2017

    Cam MacKay is engaging in wedge politics.

    “wedge politics(Noun)
    A strategy or pattern of behavior by a politician, political party, or advocacy group which is intended to have a divisive effect on one’s political opponents or on the electorate, especially by emphasizing an issue which polarizes opinion along racial, regional, or other demographic lines.”

    The Library has become the scape goat or if you prefer the whipping boy for MacKay and Hughes. Everything that Mr.Cuff said causing the current council to be dysfunctional was in full display at the last council meeting.

    Reply
  7. Linda Marshall

    September 10th, 2017

    Librarians and library supporters tend to be articulate, well organized, and passionate. Brad Wall backed down in the face of their wrath, Mackay would do well to keep that in mind.

    Reply
    • Dave

      September 10th, 2017

      The “Library Plebiscite Update Cards” carry the implied message that only the MacKay slate will ensure that the branch library ( as envisioned) will NOT be built after the election . I hope that voters are under no other illusion.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)