What you should worry about when you worry about President Trump – hint: not where Ivanka sits!

Posted on February 16, 2017, 1:55 am
9 mins

PHOTOS: The controversial photo of Mr. Donald, Ivanka Trump and Enrique Peña Nieto … Wait! That’s Joe Trudeau! Below: U.S. Presidents whose “First Ladies” weren’t necessarily their wives, for one reason or another … Thomas Jefferson, who predated the whole First Lady phenomenon; Martin van Buren, a widower; Grover Cleveland, who married while he was an occupant of the White House, and James Buchanan, a bachelor.

It’s actually pretty hard to know who to root for in the emerging war between U.S. President Donald Trump and the mainstream media.

I mean, seriously people, I find Mr. Trump as scary as the next sane person – although apparently not for the same reasons as the MSM, which seems to think he hates Russia with insufficient fervor.

I admit, though, I felt a smidgen of sympathy for the man when I read Canada’s National Post yesterday morning, wherein some sort of commentator complained at tiresome length about the fact Melania Trump, the First Mister’s Mrs., is apparently missing in action – the action, just to be clear, being defined as fulfilling the duties of what our American cousins quaintly call a “First Lady.”

As an aside, one of the great disappointments of Democratic Party candidate Hillary Clinton’s loss in last November’s Presidential election was that we didn’t get to hear what the Americans would have called Mr. Bill, who is certainly no gentleman. Probably just “President Clinton,” seeing as American heads of state get that title for life, go figure.

Whatever, the Post’s starting point about what the World Book Encyclopedia my parents bought me used to call “the Mistress of the White House,” a term that almost makes one glad almost no one actually prints encyclopedias any more, was not that Mrs. Melania is missing, or even that Mr. Donald’s daughter Ivanka seems to be fulfilling her duties as First Lady, but that the younger Ms. Trump, the daughter of another mother, was photographed sitting in the president’s chair in the Oval Office with the dreamboat leader of a neighbouring country. (Enrique Peña Nieto? Don’t think he was in Washington. Or do you mean Joe Trudeau? — Ed.)

I’m not making this up. Here, you can read it for yourself if you have the fortitude.

I’m here to tell you that whatever we have to worry about Mr. Trump getting up to in the Oval Office, it’s not where he lets the First Daughter sit, with whom, or even what the Post calls her “ambitious agenda.” Which is what? Getting her dad to make stores buy her frocks?

Fact is, there’s absolutely nothing new about presidential daughters (and others) filling in as First Ladies. Consider:

  • One of the daughters of Thomas Jefferson, President No. 3, fulfilled the role, even if the title wasn’t bandied around until Dolly Madison, wife of No. 4, James, came along. This was because President Jefferson’s wife had died before he got the job. (Another of his daughters was deemed a slave at birth in the strange alternate reality we call the Land of the Free.)
  • The wife of James Monroe, No. 5, was very ill. Consequently, his daughter served as First Lady.
  • Martin Van Buren, No. 8, was a widower. His daughter-in-law served … or, at least, oversaw the servants.
  • The wife of No 9, William Henry Harrison, hated Washington so much she refused to move to the White House. This turned out to be a shrewd decision, as President Harrison only lasted a month in office before dying. Until then, the position of First Lady was filled by Jane Findlay.
  • The wife of John Tyler, No. 10, was disabled by a stroke. His daughter performed the First Lady’s duties.
  • No. 15, James Buchanan, was a bachelor. He asked his niece to step in as First Lady.
  • Chester Arthur, No. 21, was a widower. His sister was First Lady.
  • Grover Cleveland, No. 22, married during the time he occupied the White House. Until then, his sister did the job.
  • Benjamin Harrison’s wife died while he was in office and his daughter stepped into the breach for the remainder of No. 23’s term. (He later married his first wife’s niece, not that that would matter to the Post, because he wasn’t president by then.)
  • Woodrow Wilson, No. 28, moved into the White House with one First Lady and moved out with another. But who did the job between the death of his first wife and his marriage to the second? No idea.

The point being, if you want to worry about Mr. Trump and his family, you could more profitably occupy your mind, say, with the fact a man with the maturity and impulse control of an eight-year-old now has the firing codes to 4,000 nuclear weapons.

Or that, if he manages not to start a war, he says he’ll deport 11 million or more people, which would be a humanitarian disaster that would prompt calls for the UN to implement responsibility to protect if any other country were proposing the same thing. Or that he may already be causing a European-style refugee crisis right here in Canada. Pick your poison!

Speaking of which, the CBC has reported with astonishment that that Alberta’s many “preppers” – folks who stockpile canned goods, energy bars, batteries, gold bars, guns, ammo and the like in the expectation of an impending apocalypse – have been on a buying spree since the election of Mr. Trump as president of the great Republic next door.

This is an interesting phenomenon in that “prepping” is an activity historically associated in this part of the world with only the looniest and most paranoid corners of the political right, who, up to now have also been expressing their joy at Mr. Trump’s election.

Does this indicate a glimmer of common sense emerging beneath the thick skulls of the black helicopter crowd? By recognized a real threat, are they tacitly admitting they’ve just been fooling around up to now?

Or maybe it’s a matter of a whole new market for prepping, sensible people coming to the darkest conclusions about the future of the failing state next door. Or maybe there’s a sudden realization that climate change, whether you deny it or not, may make it hard to find a grocery store or an automatic bank machine if a dam blows out upstream from your riverside mobile home or a catastrophic forest fire is approaching.

As for Melania Trump, who knows or cares? She may sensibly be concentrating on getting her assets offshore as quickly as possible for entirely different reasons.

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

12 Comments to: What you should worry about when you worry about President Trump – hint: not where Ivanka sits!

  1. Rocky

    February 16th, 2017

    I’ve heard the issue with President Buchanan is that he really would have preferred a First Laddie to a First Lady.

    Reply
    • Ivan

      February 16th, 2017

      Why is that an issue?

      I’ll take issue with that doughface’s support for the expansion of slavery, and his signing of the fugitive slave act. But why cast aspersions over his relationship with Rufus DeVane King?

      Reply
  2. Val Jobson

    February 16th, 2017

    Does her creepy father have his hand on her back? Notice Trudeau’s hand is carefully far away.

    Reply
  3. Val

    February 16th, 2017

    except of part about the first ladies in US history, in the rest of story is too much dramatization. sure, president of US has plenty of power, including fire power but in anyway it’s not the power of dictator, who heads a totalitarian state and there are still in place Constitution and quite lots of tools to put harness on him if he’s gone mad.
    rather Canada more likely to be turned into dictatorship, than USA.

    Reply
      • Val

        February 16th, 2017

        that’s pretty much hypothetical but nevertheless, unlike USA, Canada formally doesn’t have any Constitutional chapter or for that matter even the law, which limit office term for premier minister. if one day some crook like Putin would grab the power, he can stay in there for lifetime.
        with some skill in manipulation, even pass this power to his or her descendants.

        another quite significant indicator are, an ability/right of citizens to own the weapons.
        the more governments tends to authoritarian form of governance, the more obstacles they will put on weapon ownership.
        statistically most legal guns on the hands are – US, followed by Switzerland, Finland, Sweden, Norway, France… Canada at (unlucky) 13th position.
        at the bottom of the list you will find North Korea, Cuba, China, Vietnam, Russia and former soviet territories and such.

        Reply
  4. February 16th, 2017

    Thank you again, David, for another good article. While the very existence of ‘President Trump’ is a challenge for all liberal observers, he represents, at best, a needed departure from the terrifying direction America was headed. If Hillary Clinton had won the presidency, I was prepared to become a ‘prepper’. I had plans to buy water jugs and canned goods and store them in my basement. I am willing to cut Trump a lot of slack, because every day his administration does something astoundingly foolish, I can observe that our world is still not a smoking radioactive ruin. Lesser evilism, I suppose.

    Reply
  5. David Khan

    February 16th, 2017

    I was thinking the same thing about this “IvankaOvalOfficeChair-gate” article.. of all the crazy things going on down there, this manufactured controversy deserved column-inches in a national newspaper?

    Reply
  6. David

    February 16th, 2017

    I think Melania preferred being married to a New York business man rather than the President. Perhaps his somewhat unexpected victory was a surprise for her too. There seems to two types of political spouses, those that enjoy and relish politics and those that dislike life in a fishbowl. I get the impression Melania is the second type. I expect she may eventually ease into the role of first lady, but it can be like jumping into a pool of cold water.

    Fortunately, Trump has his daughter Ivanka who is much more comfortable with public and political roles to fill in as needed. I suppose this is what families do, roles get juggled based on interest. Unfortunately, her sitting in the “big chair” has raised the ire of Americans who have some deep seated suspicions/fears that some of their Presidents have monarchical or dynastic ambitions.

    Americans were not eager to see a third Bush in the White House or a second Clinton and I doubt after the first Trump, they will be eager for a second.

    Reply
    • Expat Albertan

      February 16th, 2017

      Hmm…I wonder if that, because Melania is not American born, The Donald fears somehow being the unwitting recipient of some ‘First Lady’ birtherism…

      Reply
  7. Ivan

    February 16th, 2017

    It might be noted that the marriage of Florence Folsom and Grover Cleveland was the only presidential wedding ever conducted in the White House. He was 49 at their wedding, she was significantly less than half his age.

    So … there’s precedent to this President’s affection for younger women.

    Reply
  8. ronmac

    February 16th, 2017

    Watching the MSM go banannas over the rise of Trump despit their best efforts has been a treat. I haven’t had this much political fun in years.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)