Leader Brian Jean appears to have violated Wildrose constitution when he tried to suspend Derek Fildebrandt

Posted on May 31, 2016, 8:46 pm
3 mins

PHOTO: Now-restored Wildrose Party Finance Critic Derek Fildebrandt and party Leader Brian Jean, photographed in happier times. (Photo grabbed from Mr. Jean’s Facebook page.) Below: A screen capture of the photo accompanying today’s news release on the Wildrose Party website.

Wildrose Opposition Brian Jean appears to have been operating in violation of the party’s constitution when he tried to suspend renegade MLA Derek Fildebrandt late Friday night.

Article 9.3 of the Wildrose Constitution, as adopted by the party’s members in 2015, states unequivocally that “members of Caucus may only be ordered expelled from Caucus on the initiative of the Leader and supported by a majority vote of Caucus, held by secret vote by ballot.” (Emphasis added; temptation to edit resisted.)

caucus_slider copyIt’s hard to see how Mr. Jean, who was in Vancouver attending the federal Conservative Party’s policy convention and farewell bunfest for former prime minister Stephen Harper, could have arranged a secret ballot of his caucus.

After all, at least some caucus members were here in Alberta, and Mr. Fildebrandt himself, a member of caucus too who by his own testimony was surprised by the late-night press release announcing his putative expulsion, presumably didn’t get to vote.

This might partly account for the short Wildrose Party press release this afternoon welcoming back Mr. Fildebrandt and including a carefully parsed denial of yesterday’s media and blogosphere reports on the conditions Mr. Jean tried to impose on Mr. Fildebrandt before he would be readmitted to caucus.

“The multiple alleged conditions reported yesterday in the media were not accurate,” the news release said.

If the story was wrong, however, the Wildrose Party missed a perfect opportunity to correct it yesterday when I asked two senior party communications officials if the reports were accurate. Neither responded to my emails.

Accompanied by a photo of the Wildrose caucus climbing stairs together, the party news release said Mr. Fildebrandt had agreed to “a plan to better handle and control social media, including hiring a social media manager to handle public interactions.” That was all.

Postmedia’s Alberta newspapers, meanwhile, reported confidently this afternoon that Mr. Fildebrandt had been restored to full caucus membership without agreeing to the five conditions he was supposedly required to meet before readmission.

This must be excruciatingly embarrassing to Mr. Jean personally, who has been revealed to have less power than a loose-cannon MLA who has made a nuisance of himself for a year. It also reveals the party to be deeply divided with the most right-wing faction led by Mr. Fildebrandt – often known as Team Angry by opponents of the Wildrose Party – firmly in the drivers seat.

This humiliation of Mr. Jean significantly degrades whatever authority he had left in an organization edging ever closer to becoming the Wild Rose Hip Tea Party. Let the intramural #Kudatah plotting resume.

12 Comments to: Leader Brian Jean appears to have violated Wildrose constitution when he tried to suspend Derek Fildebrandt

  1. Martin d'Entremont

    May 31st, 2016

    Um, cue “Send In The Clowns”.

    Reply
  2. Don Sinclair

    May 31st, 2016

    The bottom line is obvious David, no matter who leads the WRP in three years, the NDP defeat at that time will be as momentous as their election last time around. Count on it.

    Reply
    • Athabascan

      June 1st, 2016

      Yeah, sure! It’ll longer than 4 years for the WRP to get their act together. With no credible alternative I trust Albertans will make the right choice – again!

      Keep hope alive Don. As you say one day I’m sure the NDP will lose an election. Be patient though, because it could take 10 or more years.

      Reply
    • jay

      June 1st, 2016

      The fact that you imply it doesn’t matter who leads the WRP contains the reason you may be wrong.

      Reply
  3. Fritz Kropfreiter

    May 31st, 2016

    In light of this situation, it can readily be inferred that Brian Jean’s days as leader are numbered. Unfortunately, if the activities of the lunatic right fringe south of the border are any indication, this group will become more vocal and more strident in their behaviour. Jean, as an old school Reform style Tory from the Harper camp, is not up to the rhetoric and won’t satisfy the blood lust of hard core WRPers.

    Reply
  4. David Harrigan

    June 1st, 2016

    It appears to me that Mr. Jean does not understand his base. Mr. Fildebrant does not understand that politics is more that grabbing headlines. But saddest of all, Mr. D’Entremont does not understand Sondheim.

    Reply
    • Ron

      June 1st, 2016

      Ah, but artistic interpretation is very subjective.
      And as to Brian Jean … no one ever wrote a ditty called “Send in the Undertakers”.

      Reply
  5. Athabascan

    June 1st, 2016

    LOL Make some more popcorn, because the the show is clearly underway. It seems Jean has been completely outplayed by Fildebrandt. Round 1 goes to the challenger. Let’s see what happens next. This is classic Shakespeare, or should I say Machiavelli?

    Reply
  6. AlbertaPride

    June 1st, 2016

    As the race for demagogue-in-chief heats up with the radically rude ‘Rosers, Progressive Conservatives are the likely big winners in this new iteration of Alberta’s kudatah. Perhaps now it should be called “fildedatah” .

    Reply
  7. JOSEPH BYCIUK

    June 1st, 2016

    Brian Jean Did What He Had to Do

    He needed time to weigh all the facts..

    Reply
  8. Martin d'Entremont

    June 1st, 2016

    Isn’t it rich?
    Isn’t it queer?
    Losing my timing this late in my career.
    And where are the clowns.
    There ought to be clowns.
    Oh well, maybe next year.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)