Labour Day 2015: Analyzing Europe’s refugee crisis through the lens of labour rights

Posted on September 07, 2015, 1:57 am
8 mins

PHOTOS: The Za’atari camp for Syrian refugees in Jordan. Below: International studies scholar Vijay Prashad; former Conservative Senator Hugh Segal.

On Labour Day 2015, the world’s attention is focused on the great migration of desperate human beings streaming into Europe from the economic and military catastrophes of North Africa and the Middle East.

The proximate cause of the latest great wave of refugees is the civil war in Syria, a complicated and murky situation in which none of the major players in the military conflict unfolding in and around Syria appear to have the interests of the poor people of that benighted country at heart.

Prashad-RThe Conservative government of Canada has been rightly excoriated for its pathetic and disingenuous determination to do as little as possible to solve this burgeoning human crisis – which comes as no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention – while giving the impression we are pulling our weight with the rest of the world. The numbers show we are not.

But while we focus on the impact of a war we little understand, the larger crisis that Europe has been confronting and which will be with it for a long time yet has a cause closer to the meaning of Labour Day than that of Remembrance Day.

Vijay Prashad, Professor of International Studies at Trinity College in Hartford, Conn., and in 2013-14 the Edward Said Chair at the American University of Beirut, discusses the connection between the Mediterranean migration crisis and the rights of working people in a useful essay published last week on Counterpunch.org.

“The West believes that it is acceptable for it to intervene to influence the political economy of the Third World – to force IMF-driven ‘reforms’ on these states,” Dr. Prashad wrote in Regime Change Refugees: On the Shores of Europe.

“Capital is allowed be borderless,” he explains. “That freedom does not apply to labour – to people. Migration is forbidden. … If Capital destroys the society here, its people cannot be allowed to migrate there.

“The West believes that it is acceptable for it to overthrow governments and bomb its enemies in the lands of the Third World. It sees this as the limit of its humanitarianism. It calls this humanitarian interventionism or, in the language of the UN, ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P). When it breaks states, as it did in Libya, the West takes no responsibility for the broken lives of the people in those zones.”

“Bombs are borderless,” Dr. Prashad goes on. “But war refugees must stand in queues and be held in concentration camps. They are not allowed freedom of movement.”

This is analysis worth pondering when Prime Minister Stephen Harper touts Canada’s strategically unfocused and likely internationally illegal bombing mission in Syria as part of our humanitarian solution to the crisis of the Syrian civil war, and likewise lauds our military’s participation in the disastrous Libyan campaign.

Libya, like Syria and Iraq, is another major source of the refugees streaming, at great peril, toward Europe.

It may be that to solve the crisis in Syria the West has to wage war, although it would help if we could agree on whom. But it should be obvious the task will be much bigger than that.

Regardless, surely the time has come for us to choose a government here in Canada that can look beyond bombs, walls and the concentration of wealth as the only panaceas for humanity’s woes.

+ + +

Meanwhile, at home in Canada, the same corrosive neoliberal ideology – which, like rust, never sleeps – is once again busy this Labour Day assailing the very things that have made our country a desirable place to live and work, in particular the seasonal neoliberal attack on the right of working people to bargain collectively.

Segal-LThe tireless anti-union propagandists of the Fraser Institute, generously funded by foreign corporate interests that include the notorious Koch Brothers of New York, were at it again this weekend with their annual Labour Day paean to U.S.-style “right-to-work” legislation, laws designed to make it difficult for unions to operate with the hope of destroying utterly the ability of working people to work together for their common good.

This year’s Fraser screed, the distribution of which was abetted as usual by the Postmedia newspaper chain that now dominates print and Internet mainstream news in English-speaking Canada, seems to have dispensed entirely with factual analysis, a trend that began last year when the facts couldn’t be pretzelled to fit the fake institute’s conclusions.

Instead, the Fraser fictionalists mainly spend their time this year singing the praises of the same Harper Government for its patently unconstitutional union “transparency” legislation, commonly known as Bill C-377. This is the law, passed in June, of which former Conservative Senator Hugh Segal predicted: “… at the first legal challenge it will be struck down by the courts.”

Other than restating their past claims about the supposed benefits of suppressing unions – which are thoroughly debunked each year – the Fraserites hardly even make an effort now to back them up with analysis. They seem instead to have moved fully into the realm of economic creation science.

Well, it’s still a free country, after a fashion, and there’s not much we can do about the willingness of the Fraser Institute to publish fiction or even outright lies. But we can do something about the foundering media chain that ensures this drivel has a mass audience.

Yes, I understand, a few of those Postmedia newspapers employ union members, but it is nevertheless time for Canadian unions to stop encouraging these unending efforts to destroy collective bargaining and the rights of working people by withholding our advertising dollars from Postmedia’s newspapers.

At the very least, we should do so until they make and live up to a commitment to seek balancing comment, provided in advance, to every story featuring the dubious claims of right-wing thinktankery.

+ + +

Don’t forget today’s Labour Day picnics, sponsored in many communities by Alberta’s labour councils.

The Edmonton and District Labour Council Labour Day BBQ, at which food will be  for the unemployed and underemployed, will take place from 11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. in Giovanni Caboto Park, at 95th Street and 109th Avenue.

The Calgary and District Labour Council’s BBQ will be held from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. in Olympic Plaza.

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

6 Comments to: Labour Day 2015: Analyzing Europe’s refugee crisis through the lens of labour rights

  1. Tom in Ontario

    September 7th, 2015

    The Labour Day Parade in Windsor was a happy march of orange clad participants representing many unions and progressive groups. One Tory blue costume was spotted: a coat on someone’s dog.

    Reply
  2. pogo

    September 7th, 2015

    Well, here we are. Labour day is a happy day!

    https://youtu.be/Dd-o_kLONVI

    By the way, can anyone think of a three or less syllable worker friendly improvement on “Right to Work”? Those slave masters of freedom are makin’ hay with that one!

    Reply
  3. Raj

    September 7th, 2015

    “http://www.vox.com/2015/7/29/9048401/bernie-sanders-open-borders”

    Open borders would double global GDP, with most of the benefit going to world’s poorest people. Forget trickle down economics–this is Niagra falls economics. However, as mentioned in the link above, social democrat Bernie Sanders decries open borders as a “Koch brothers” proposal. The social democratic Scandinavian countries restrict their immigration. You can criticize the elites for many things, but restricting the free movement of labor is entirely a populist construct–witness the rise of Donald Trump as an example of this on the right wing.

    Reply
  4. S. Sinciair

    October 3rd, 2015

    On traditions of labour day and traditional union organization.
    It seems to me that we have to start a new conversation about the viability of the present union structures and methods. The combination of the Collective Labour Agreement and the Rand formula dues collection system have become a trap for union members and working people generally. The unions under this regime are steadily evolving into “dues collection agencies” whose primary concerns are staff wages and pensions. They are no longer fighting organizations of working people under the control of the memberships.
    The old union song that says, “You got to go down and join the union by yourself.” is no longer realistic. Membership in a union is not the decision of individual workers any more. First, the union staff have to decide that your shop can be and is “worth” organizing. That is will supply enough dues dollars to at least pay the costs of organizing it. Second, new members often have to face the implacable hostility of reactionary or psychopathic managers and owners. Rather than joining a union and getting used to it they get shoved into the front lines of a battle they know little about and for which they are ill-prepared.
    I won’t go further here, as this is only beginning of a very large conversation.

    Reply
  5. S. Sinciair

    October 5th, 2015

    PS

    Good blog. Came across it on newcoldwar.org.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)