Conventional wisdom in Canadian political and media circles seems to be that Albertans are almost to a man and woman deeply discontented with their relationship with the rest of Canada.

Prominent Canadian economist Jim Stanford (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

Yet recent polling about the divisive and deceptively worded separation referendum foisted on Albertans by their province’s now separatist dominated United Conservative Party Government strongly suggests this is not the real story. 

Despite a massive foreign-funded disinformation and misinformation campaign and the willing collaboration of a significant sector of Canadian mass media, Albertans are still overwhelmingly in favour of remaining part of Canada. 

If they’re so unhappy, it’s reasonable to ask, why do they want to stay? 

Well, maybe they can smell the aroma of BS that’s blowing on the breeze nowadays – and not just from all the farmers’ fields around here. 

The separatist propaganda machine would like you to think it’s because the majority of Albertans are frightened sissies, cowed by the “woke agenda,” cowering in fear before a gloriously beckoning MAGA future. 

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, leader of the United Conservative Party (Photo: Government of Alberta/Flickr).

This, of course, is nonsense, and rather insulting. Just the same, concern about what the significant number of racist, neo-fascist, misogynist, and Christian nationalist individuals who have gravitated to the Alberta separatist movement would do if they ever got real power in an independent nation is entirely justified. 

It’s reasonable to wonder, though, about the true origin of the economic problems that separatists and the UCP government alike want us to think have all been perpetrated on Alberta by Ottawa’s notorious “Laurentian elites.”* 

What is the origin of Albertans’ legitimate economic worries, then? As Edmonton-raised economist Jim Stanford wrote in a recent paper on the separatists’ false promises, “the core source of Albertans’ mistreatment in recent years lies right here in Alberta.” 

“Successive conservative governments in Alberta have long practised ‘blame Ottawa’ politics,” wrote Dr. Stanford, who is now director of the Centre for Future Work and the Harold Innis Industry Professor in Economics at McMaster University. According to this narrative, he explained, “whatever is wrong in the province must be the fault of an intrusive, acquisitive federal government, perpetually interfering with the province’s affairs and stealing its resources, taxes and wealth.”

Alberta conservative governments operating under various trade names have raised this narrative of victimization to a form of art, and it’s reached new levels of hysteria under the leadership of Premier Danielle Smith. But while the hard times are real for many Albertans, Dr. Stanford argues, “the claim that Ottawa is fully and solely to blame for this hardship bears no relationship to economic reality.”

Jason Kenney, Alberta’s first UCP premier, soon after he turned up in Alberta Provincial politics (Photo: David J. Climenhaga).

“By many key indicators, Alberta has performed uniquely poorly relative to other provinces, including economic growth, investment, wages, and living standards,” he said in the report commissioned by the Alberta Federation of Labour and published on Aug. 31. Indeed, this has been obvious since the UCP took power under Jason Kenney in 2019.

Citing published analysis by many economists, Dr. Stanford’s report debunks the claims of separatists that we’d all be richer, lower taxed and happier if only Alberta were free of Ottawa.

Remember, Dr. Stanford noted, that here in what was once the highest paid jurisdiction in Canada for working people, productivity per worker is still higher than in any other province, “yet wages now barely match the national average.” What happened? 

Thanks to the wage-suppression policies of the UCP, introduced by Mr. Kenney after his election in 2019 and continued to this day under Premier Danielle Smith, Alberta is the only province where real wages relative to inflation have fallen since that year, Dr. Stanford pointed out. In 2015, average Alberta wages were 16 per cent above the national average. That wage advantage has now all but disappeared. 

“The fact Alberta wages have lagged so far behind the rest of the country cannot be blamed on federal policies,” he wrote. 

Federal policy would have had similar impact in all provinces. Rather, “Alberta’s aggressive and perverse efforts to deliberately suppress wages (such as the eight-year freeze on the minimum wage, and harsh restrictions on union organizing and collective bargaining) are the culprit,” he argued. “The UCP Government continues to deliberately suppress wages through multiple channels.” 

Meanwhile, “production and export of petroleum have never been higher, and petroleum profits are setting new records,” Dr. Stanford wrote. “Yet petroleum employment declined by 40,000 in the last decade.” This, he noted, is “not because Ottawa was somehow handcuffing this industry, but because petroleum companies found ways to produce more oil and gas with fewer workers.”

Even during the much-disparaged Trudeau government, thanks to the federal expenditure on pipeline expansion Alberta’s exports grew at a much faster pace than the Canadian average. “The claim that Alberta is ‘blocked’ from exporting its petroleum and other products by Ottawa is exactly backwards,” Dr. Stanford said. “Whatever’s wrong in Alberta, it must be due to what’s happening within the province not due to a failure to export.”

The data shows that corporate investment, however, is down, despite all the favours done for big business and especially the oil industry by the UCP. “The petroleum industry is more concerned with paying record dividends and share buybacks than reinvesting in Alberta’s economy.” And thanks to Donald Trump’s war of choice in the Persian Gulf, profits were up more than 144 per cent in this year’s second quarter. In the same period, investment was down. 

At the same time, the UCP has done nothing to slow the elimination of jobs by the petroleum industry, including moving work from Alberta to foreign corporate offices. Since 2014, oil production has increased by almost 60 per cent while employment has fallen more than 25 per cent. “The industry is producing more, and generating more profits, but with fewer workers. That is the consequence of corporate cost-cutting, not Ottawa’s policies.”

And while nominal wages may be down thanks to the UCP, the impact of inflation has been worse, once again because of provincial policies – including higher increases in electricity, insurance and tuition costs than in any other province. Average real wages fell 3 per cent between 2019 and 2025, the only province in which they fell. 

“All of these policies reinforce the shift of wealth from workers to business, and reinforce workers’ hardship,” Dr. Stanford explained. “None of them have anything to do with the federal government.”

I will return very soon to Dr. Stanford’s analysis of what hard economic data say about the “false narratives and phony claims” – in many cases, outright lies – promoted by Alberta separatists inside and outside the UCP. DJC 

*That fatuous term, by the way, was coined by a Globe and Mail journalist, born and raised in Ontario and best known for his admiring take on Stephen Harper’s Conservative rule – in other words, the very definition of a Laurentian elite.

Join the Conversation

37 Comments

  1. Let’s collect all of the “Alberta conservative governments operating under various trade names” that have successively blamed Ottawa for their own mismanagement as …

    Quaternary Quislings.

    I’ll keep trying to find an epithet thst sticks.

    1. How about Cordilleran Carpers?
      Or, given the UCP’s current attitude towards Washington, Prairie Pétainistes?

  2. Now only if the conventional media, such as Postmedia, could grasp these facts. They won’t do that. Albertans were cheated out of $725 billion in a combination of very pathetic oil royalty rates and tax rates, which weren’t what Peter Lougheed had intended us to have. Besides this we were left with a very large cost of $320 billion to take care of an orphan well mess, which Peter Lougheed never would have allowed to happen. Billions of dollars were also thrown away on very expensive boondoogles of various types. Look at what Alaska and Norway have in comparison to Alberta. Their oil wealth is much more. When pseudo Conservatives and Reformers are in power, we get robbed. As a result, our public education system, our public healthcare system, our infrastructure, and our social services suffers. After oil prices collapse, we are no better off. Yet, Ottawa is always to blame, either from Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh, and now Mark Carney. Or Rachel Notley got the blame. Very bad way of thinking.

    1. To be fair, some of us were heartily disappointed after the Notley government’s pathetic excuse for a royalty review. It failed to truly extract the resource revenue we as Alberta residents and owners of the resource should have been entitled to.

      A truly just outcome would have been a royalty regime based on a percentage of the wellhead price of oil or gas, or its equivalent from the oilsands. When prices were low, the royalty would also be low, but when prices rose, so would royalties. I had advocated for an escalating price of 11% in Year One, 22% in Year Two, and 33% in Year Three and beyond.

      I think they chickened out on this.

  3. Hi David,

    Racist
    Neo-fascist
    Misogynist
    Christian Nationalist

    Perfect summary!

    Another big self-inflicted economic wound is of course the pathetically low royalties we extract from oil and gas, and the unwillingness to sock away these lousy returns for a post fossil fuel future.

  4. The other thing UCP supporters like to blame our provincial woes on, is the 4 years the NDP were in office.

    1. I lived in Edmonton and worked for the GoA during the NDP government. They were the best government, by far, in Alberta history. Sadly, they were only elected because the right wing vote was split between old stock conservatives and new fangled alt-right christo-fascists. Jason Kenney fixed that for the province.

  5. I found a possible minor thing that doesn’t sound quite right “and happier of only Alberta were free of Ottawa.” Should the of perhaps be if?
    As I recall, the Conservatives (whichever form you like to call them) have ever sine the late 1970’s been targeting unions and driving down wages of working people. Although the most blatant examples can be seen in the Kenny / Smith days of late, all this started long ago when the Provincial Unions held a one day strike to protest and embarrass Lougheed. After that Lougheed vowed to slam unions and brought in sanctions against many of the trades unions by allowing union companies to have non-union spin offs under the same roof as the unions shops. I remember the days when my wages were cut in half over-night. The only redeeming days of late was when we had an NDP government that brought back some dignity to unions. This of course was quickly wiped out by Kenny.

    1. Speaking of typos etc., it’s “Kenney”, not “Kenny”. Autocorrect doesn’t like it, but it’s the correct spelling.

    2. I remember when Peter Lougheed put in measures to disenfranchise postsecondary students. I went to the polls and voted against him. I don’t know why some people have such rosy memories of the man. Yes, he did some good things. And then he didn’t.

  6. It’s too bad, that UPC supporters and separatists don’t want to read this “horse shit”. (speaking from their point of view) It’s easier for them to listen and spew the Ottawa / Trudeau narrative, than educate themselves. It would seem, that the Smith Gov. along with all the other involved parties, Post Media included, have done a good job in brain washing a large segment of Albertans. Sad.

  7. Unfortunately, it’s not just the seppies who are disinforming us.
    Many of the mainstream leaders of the “stay in Canada” movement insist that seppie grievances are legit.
    Several of our so-called leaders parrot seppie talking points.
    Big help!

    At the top of the list is Ontario-export and former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, now leading the pro-Canada charge, after spending much of his term fanning the flames of discontent against Ottawa (“Fair Deal Panel”, Equalization Referendum, etc.). As premier, Kenney stirred up separatist threats as political leverage against Ottawa for pipelines etc..
    Arsonist-in-chief now acting as fire marshal. Even today, Kenney repeats the same pseudo-grievances recited by Alberta separatists.

    Jason Kenney (X, May 1, 2025): Albertans have good reason to be deeply frustrated with Ottawa.
    Despite making a net contribution of ~$20 billion to fiscal federalism every year, we have faced a government in Ottawa fundamentally hostile to our largest industry, one central to Canada’s economy.
    https://x.com/jkenney/status/1918037439551066414

    AB NDP leader Naheed Nenshi: “And certainly Albertans have not had the best deal from Confederation. I’ve never shied away from saying that. Equalization is not fair.”
    “… We don’t have access for our resources. We don’t have respect for not just our economic power but also for our social innovation that happens here. These are LEGITIMATE things, and these are things that we need to work with the federal government on to secure better deals for Alberta, especially now.” (“I Love Canada”, YouTube, 07 May 2025)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4e8Xu5xtqU

    Globe and Mail: “Dismissing the independence movement is a mistake. Instead, Ottawa should move decisively to deal with the province’s LEGITIMATE grievances.”
    “… Many of the grievances fueling separatism are mainstream, real and longstanding …”
    “How to punch a hole in the sails of Alberta separatists” (Globe and Mail, June 7, 2026)

    Michael Harris: “… The persistent grievances of would-be separatists must be acknowledged and addressed with an open mind and open heart, with generosity and respect.”
    “Danielle Smith’s Love Letter to Quebec” (The Tyee, 26-Jun-26)

    “[Thomas Lukaszuk] told the Canadian Club of Edmonton Wednesday, the federalists have to accept that there are indeed some LEGITIMATE points of contention.” (EJ, Jun 19, 2026)

    Gary Mar, president and CEO of the Canada West Foundation: “Albertans have every right to be frustrated with Confederation. Equalization, pipelines, energy and climate policy, interprovincial trade barriers and Alberta’s influence in national decision-making did not become issues because a referendum was proposed. These grievances have been building for decades …”
    “Canada West Foundation: What Alberta Separation Would Actually Mean” (EJ, Aug 22, 2026)

    Adam Legge: “Albertans should fight for a better deal, but separation is not the way (EJ, Sep 06, 2026)
    Alberta contributes enormously to Canada’s prosperity yet doesn’t receive fair treatment in return. The equalization formula, which primarily benefits Quebec, is heavily skewed against Alberta. Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have more Senate seats than Alberta. Major project approvals still take far too long, and federal resource and emissions policies have had an outsized negative economic impact on Alberta.
    These are not minor grievances, and they confirm why the debate over separation cannot simply be dismissed or treated as a question of loyalty to Canada.”

    1. For once, Mr Pounder, I wholehearted agree with you. The equalization matter is probably the most pervasive, persistent and pernicious myth in Alberta politics.

      In my humble opinion, attacks on equalization aren’t about federal-provincial politics. They’re about anti-francophone/anti-Québec bigotry. Foes of equalization don’t cite provinces like Newfoundland & Labrador or Manitoba as equalization recipients — they harp ad nauseum about Québec. It’s really today’s equivalent to French on corn flakes boxes.

  8. Hello DJC and fellow commenters,
    I am in Nova Scotia for a while this summer. When I tell people of many walks of life that I am from Alberta, many look askance. I always explain to them my views of Danielle Smith’s positions and reference the main Danielle Smith ideas that are egregious.
    I am not sure if ideas even suits the situation as it seems that Danielle Smith appears to be acting on her instinct to destroy any public benefit of people working together to create a better situation for everyone. One example is her working to destroy universal and equal health care coverage for Albertans.
    I truly believe that Jason Kenney’s Ottawa bashing is an important factor in making a Danielle Smith possible.

    1. Jason Kenney is the creator of what we are dealing with and is now trying to get on the decent side of the issue. There is nothing decent about him PERIOD.

      1. Carlos: Preston Manning had a hand in this too. He doesn’t know when to retire from politics. Jason Kenney is now on the board of directors at Postmedia. They have to reward one of their overlords.

  9. Me? I see no grounds for complaint whatever.
    Seppie grievances are largely imaginary.
    Record profits on record oil production. Under Trudeau.
    A fact seppies NEVER mention.

    Alberta taxpayers account for 14 cents on the federal tax dollar.
    The other 86 cents? Thank taxpayers outside Alberta.
    14% of federal revenues. That’s your “cash cow”?

    All wealthy taxpayers contribute more than they receive.
    Most of Canada’s wealthy taxpayers live outside AB.
    Under our progressive taxation system, wealth is transferred not from province to province, but from high-income earners (wealthy taxpayers) to lower.

    Toronto and Montreal taxpayers account for one third of total taxes. Add Vancouver makes 40%.
    Collectively, taxpayers from Canada’s major cities pay far more tax than they receive in federal spending. Canada’s real net contributors.
    Team Canada’s Top-10% account for 10% of tax filers and pay 55% of income taxes. Net contributors. 85% of them live outside Alberta.
    Wealthy Canadians outside Alberta contribute far more than Albertans do — and far more than they receive in government services and programs.
    Demography, not geography. Wealth is transferred from rich to poor without respect to provincial boundaries.

    Collectively, Alberta taxpayers pay more to Ottawa than the federal government spends in Alberta. So what?
    All that means is that Albertans have high per capita income. Which does not translate to a significant share of federal revenues. Nor does it inflate Albertans’ contribution to federal revenues beyond the nominal 14%.
    Seppies confuse average income and total absolute revenues. A high average does not indicate a significant fraction of the total.
    If PEI discovers gold, it might become a “have” province, but no one would argue it props up the country. No connection.
    Average income does not tell us what we want to know: Who pays the freight in Canada?
    *
    Simple test: If Alberta secedes, Canada carries on with 86% of its revenues.
    If Team Canada’s Top-10% walk away, Canada is in real trouble.

  10. Alberta’s economy is the export of tar. That resource is theoretically under the control of the people of Alberta. It is not as it is entirely controlled by private business interests. Decisions as to how it is produced, how much and what is done with the product are made entirely to meet the requirements of a rent-seeking ownership class. This class owns the political class, and their outright assault on worker’s right began in the era of the Great Pragmatic Centrist, Peter Lougheed. Construction is the third most productive industry after tar and the real estate scam. Unions were driven from construction over forty years ago in Derpberta. The superstitious yokel-grifters have been demonstrating their inability to understand how transfer payments work for a long time, but even the ones who do grasp the simple concept don’t care. They know that in a fantasy world, the ownership class in Alberta could live essentially tax-free if they could work their kooky secession. The war is not Drumpf’s war of choice. This was a U.S. goal for over three decades. They sicced ol’ Saddam on the Persians within a year if the loss of the Shah, and have been at it in one way or a another ever since.

      1. who else could he have invited? That is the only crowd that listens to him. The solution to Iran is another demented shah.
        Read the book ‘The king of kings’ by Scott Andersen and that will give you a very clear reason why the sha should not think about Iran at all. They were as bad or worse than the current package. Pierre Poilievre, I am sure, knows nothing about Iran. I am sure he knows a lot more about white nationalists.

  11. It is fairly easy to understand what the motivations for promoting the “separatist” agenda are, if one avoids the deliberate obscurantism that often surrounds the “debate”. Long ago Mr. Manning informed everyone what it was about, i.e., hydrocarbon extraction and greater resource rents exclusively for Alberta and greater profits for private shareholders:

    “Western alienation, fuelled by the downturn in the energy sector and political resistance to the free movement of petroleum across provincial boundaries to tidewater and world markets, is reviving western separatism, particularly in Saskatchewan and Alberta,” Manning, 77, said Wednesday. [The Canadian Press, September 25, 2019]

    Noting that, the false narrative regarding the Federal government and the NEP that is constantly regurgitated by certain individuals in Alberta conveniently avoids any details contrary to the agenda of Alberta myth makers specifically and Alberta myth making generally, as the myths, or noble lies always primarily serve the interests of private profit and its extractive rent seeking behavior:

    https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/national-energy-program

  12. Alberta collects no Provincial Sales Tax or Employer Health Tax. In 10 provinces, EHT is charged to ALL companies with payrolls over a threshold (Ontario – $ 1M British Columbia $500,000) So Cenovus Energy, Suncor Energy, Imperial Oil, Canadian Natural Resources, Enbridge, TC Energy, Shell Canada, Chevron Canada, Costco Wholesale Canada, Walmart Canada, Loblaw Companies, Canadian Tire, Microsoft Canada, Apple Canada, Amazon Canada, Google Canada, Burger King Canada (Restaurant Brands International), McDonald’s Canada, Starbucks Canada, and Tim Horton would all pay to support Alberta’s Healthcare if Albertans, not oil cartels controlled government.

    1. Thank you Elizabeth!
      In our province there is what’s called an “Alberta advantage”. Unfortunately, as you and others have pointed out, it does not benefit the citizens and taxpayers of Alberta. We subsidize oligarchs and monopolies while our resource revenues are stolen (NOT by Ottawa) and our beautiful mountains and clean waters trashed!

  13. The blame Ottawa routine has worked well at times for conservative governments in Alberta, at other times not so well. I feel we are headed towards the latter now.

    The former PM certainly was a lightning rod for conservative discontent in Alberta, in part because of his family history, but he has left a while ago. To paraphrase what one conservative once humorously said about one of their former leaders (the PM before him) the bad man is gone now. So the blame Ottawa crowd is finding it much harder now to do that now.

    Ironically this is one reason why we are getting over a six pack of unwanted referendums, Smith and the UCP need new distractions. Unfortunately for them, these distractions are both damaging and time limited.

    No doubt they are are working frantically to come up with something else to try direct Albertans attention away from their own poor management of health care, education, government finances, auto insurance, electricity and the economy. However, at some point people may start to see through that tactic or get tired of being angry and begin to notice the real more local problems that have been accumulating and unresolved all along.

  14. Another part of the problem is that many Albertans have never travelled farther than the occasional trip to Calgary for Stampede. (Flying to a Mexican resort for a week of drinking and stuffing their face at the buffet doesn’t count.) They haven’t lived in other regions of Canada (or anywhere else in the world), so they lack perspective. As someone who has lived in multiple Canadian provinces, I can tell you that Albertans have no legitimate grievances and there is no Alberta Advantage. Here are some examples from the province to the west of us. I have friends in the Vancouver region and we compare notes on costs. Their car insurance is a third less than what I pay. Their home energy cost (or Hydro as they call it there) is less than half. Dental? Half what we pay in Alberta based on the dental fee schedule. There are some folks around here who really need to get off their butts and catch a Westjet flight to, say, Ontario? Quebec? Maritimes?

  15. As someone who spent 32 years working for the Royal Bank in 16 different branches throughout Alberta and was a manager of 7 of them I have never heard a better explanation of what has happened to Albertans and how they have been made fools of and thank David and Dr. Stanford for providing it.
    You can bet a lot of these mindless seniors won’t believe it. My sister was visiting us from B.C. the last few days and none of the seniors she associates with can believe how stupid the Alberta seniors are for believing the lies Smith feeds them. Like most of us they think she is an absolute idiot and watching the seniors prove how stupid they are with her lies about badly Ottawa is treating us and we better separate proves it.
    We see Jeffrey Rath is in a lot more trouble with his finances and people would be damn fools to believe anything he says.

  16. I want to understand something . What is it about Albertans that accept voting in the same party ( with the exception of 4 yrs with NDP) for over 40 years and not question the importance of having a viable opposition that challenges their government and hopefully, provides a better political balance? My question is a serious one. I’ve lived in three provinces and travelled Canada from coast to coast. I’ve made Alberta home for the last few decades. The reality I describe isn’t found anywhere else in Canada. Why here? What makes Alberta so politically different in this regard?

    1. This is the $64,000 question of #ABPoli. Alberta had only ever had four governing parties up until the NDP win in 2015: Liberal 1905-1921 … United Farmers 1921-1935 … Social Credit 1935-1971 … Progressive Conservative 1971-2015. Note, however, that once defeated, no Alberta political party has ever regained power.
      https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/politics-in-alberta

      Now, the NDP has yet to be ruled out for being re- elected, but I fear the UCP’s dominance outside the two big cities will lead to historians adding them to that list. On the other hand, the NDP now forms the largest Official Opposition in the province’s history, so we can’t count them out either. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

      I have long sought an explanation for this phenomenon, without success. But Alberta does have an unfortunate tendency to re-elect conservative governments, then try to influence their decisions after they’ve won, instead of electing other parties to govern differently as is done in every other province and federally. It leads to a phenomenon in which the voters fear their politicians, instead of the other way around, as it should be.

  17. Jim Stanford has been and is one of the few sane voices in this asylum called Alberta.
    Jason Kenney now wants to take advantage of his old rotten friends when he started all of this madness and took off before the smell of ammonia became too strong. Talk about opportunist. To me all of them should go to hell. They have destroyed the Alberta I loved and are making us the laughing stock of Canada and now the almost lowest standards of living despite the billions the oil companies suck out of here to feed Texan Trumpians.
    I heard today the best definition for these Maga shitheads especially our premier. They behave like escaped monkeys from a cocaine testing project.

  18. “They…are making us the laughing stock of Canada…”
    Not in Ontario. The Smith inspired threats are taken seriously. We do not underestimate your enemy much less laugh at them.

  19. Self-inflicted punishment! It only resonates if you live outside the bubble- a minority around (Bubbleville) Bonnyville.

  20. So- that was interesting. Mark Parsons (Vice president & Chief Economist, ATB Financial) just told a packed room at the AIHA Conference that he destroyed an LRT crossing gate this summer. Poor man got confused by all the lights and signs apparently and was in a rush.
    Disheartened by all the city construction (gotta fix all the things people break) he decided to cycle to work. Got up to the High Level Bridge only to find the sidewalk closed. But, our intrepid VP, seeing no visible construction, chose to ignore the signs and cross anyway. (The east sidewalk of the iconic High Level Bridge has been closed indefinitely following significant riverbank erosion on its southeast side. Recent heavy rainfall has compromised the slope adjacent to the wooden guardrail, leading to immediate safety concerns for pedestrians and cyclists…This incident highlights a broader need for enhanced infrastructure resilience in Edmonton’s river valley. Climate change projections indicate an increased likelihood of extreme weather events, including heavy rainfall. Proactive measures are becoming increasingly vital. Long-term strategies may involve more frequent geotechnical monitoring of critical slopes, particularly those supporting key infrastructure. Investing in advanced erosion control technologies and comprehensive stormwater management plans will also be crucial. These efforts aim to safeguard both public safety and the city’s vital assets.
    https://ladiescorner.ca/2026/06/26/high-level-bridge-sidewalk-closed-after-riverbank-erosion-threatens-public-safety-in-edmonton/)
    Now our VP was not discouraged by the hostile C of E signage, no indeed, instead he took that as a ‘sign’ that Canada should forge on, build baby build, full steam ahead with pipelines and hyperdata centres all over the place.
    Slight hiccup, there will be a shortage of skilled labour, since we aren’t bringing in the people any more, and we really don’t want to up corporate taxes to have the means to train up our young’uns. Nope, should be using their own boot straps. Besides, we need the trades people to teach kindergarten cause we don’t want to waste money training teachers!
    Is Mark Parsons typical of the bright minds leading us into the fray of tariffs and climate change and global crises? Or just an outlier?
    Mind you, apparently Dane Lloyd’s assistant didn’t show up, so I borrowed a lanyard. Must not be all that worried about the business end of the referendum I guess.
    There was a happy ending. The Rainbow Valley pedestrian bridge is now open, which made Mark Parsons and his dog happy. See what we can do when we have a vision and a mission? Mind those crossing arms.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.