When Thomas Lukaszuk said he could bring Elections Alberta pro-Canada petition forms signed by 300,000 Albertans in the three months allowed by the United Conservative Party’s “citizen initiative” legislation, there were many who said it couldn’t be done.

Premier Danielle Smith’s openly separatist political allies laughed at the former Progressive Conservative deputy premier and called him “Little Tommy Lukaszuk” on social media, which I guess is how you insult someone who worries you when you don’t have much imagination.
They could afford to laugh, they must have reckoned. Ms. Smith’s government had changed the rules to give them more time and require fewer signatures for their referendum petition, which appears to have been designed to create the conditions for a unilateral declaration of independence after a low-turnout election in the likely event the UCP’s separatist faction couldn’t muster the popular support truly needed to secede from Canada.
Mr. Lukaszuk’s Forever Canadian campaign chose the harder course in order to file their question first, in hopes of blocking the separatist petition under the murky rules of the Citizen Initiative Act. The conventional wisdom was that the process set out in the legislation, including in-person signing of all petition forms, passed by Jason Kenney’s UCP government made the task impossible.
But more than 5,000 volunteers have been toiling since August collecting signatures at markets and fairs, church dinners and coffee shops, in rural and urban communities.
And yesterday, Mr. Lukaszuk and his supporters delivered 61 boxes containing petition sheets with 456,365 signatures to Elections Alberta’s modest headquarters in an Edmonton industrial park. That’s almost certainly enough to ensure Elections Alberta can validate enough to reach the 294,000 required by the law.

So who’s laughing now?
Certainly not the separatist crowd, including its allies in the UCP’s leadership and the Premier’s Office – although we can assume they’ll do whatever they can to block the petition or invalidate the Forever Canadian signatures.
“My hope is that the Premier and all elected members of the Legislative Assembly will do the right thing,” Mr. Lukaszuk said yesterday in a news release. “We want them to listen to the voices of more than 450,000 Albertans, call a vote in the Legislative Assembly, and put an end to this divisive and dangerous talk of separation.”
Don’t count on that happening, though. As Mr. Lukaszuk also said, “the next step is in the premier’s hands.” You will hear of lawsuits and rumours of lawsuits. But the end is still to come.
In addition to being a remarkable feat of organization, yesterday’s development is no “nothing burger,” as the separatist crowd has tried to dismiss the campaign. First, it clearly demonstrates enormous popular support for Canada among Albertans.
Second, it sets the stage for a renewed political campaign if Premier Smith unwisely persists with her independence scheming.

Third, it boxes the UCP politically if it won’t solve the problem by allowing a vote in the Legislature instead of proceeding to a referendum.
But if such a vote goes ahead, imagine what would happen in a subsequent provincial election if the entire UCP Caucus in the Assembly supported separation from Canada. Imagine what would happen to the caucus if it split on the issue. The best course might be for Ms. Smith to try to whip her caucus to vote Canadian – but that, too, might be easier said than done.
Elections Alberta now has 60 days to verify the petition, including contacting a sample of signers to verify their information and signatures. The agency will report the results no later than Jan. 6, 2026, it said in a news release.
Meanwhile, more fallout from the Kenney era citizen-initiative legislation is hitting the UCP in another quarter. A petition to remove Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides as MLA for Calgary-Bow has until Jan. 31 next year to gather 16,006 valid signatures from the riding’s approximately 37,500 residents.
Mr. Nicolaides appears worried. Perhaps it’s occurred to him that some of the 51,000 pissed-off teachers who have just had their fundamental Charter right to free association suspended by the UCP’s use of the Constitution’s Notwithstanding Clause to force them back to work after a three-week strike might pitch in to help gather signatures.
In a whiny letter to constituents posted on social media, Dr. Nicolaides complained “that the petitioner is using the recall petition to influence government policy and not because she has any legitimate concerns regarding my conduct as an MLA.”
“In 2019, when then UCP leader Jason Kenney campaigned on the idea of recall, he noted that it should be an ‘instrument of accountability’ if elected officials ‘totally violate the trust of voters,’” Dr. Nicolaides wrote.
Now, I suppose that playing a key role in suspending the fundamental rights of 51,000 Albertans could be described as totally violating the trust of voters. But, no matter, what Mr. Kenney said is not what the legislation says.
Indeed, it is said here that Mr. Kenney, who was certainly the kind of politician who always read the legislation he proposed, knew of that supposed omission perfectly well. And this is because, it is reasonable to assume, the plan was to use it against NDP MLAs. Apparently it occurred to no one in the UCP strategic brain trust that turnabout is fair play, and someday it might be used against their own side.
Well, at least the UCP can take comfort from the fact it continues to poll strongly with voters. …
Oh, wait! A new poll released yesterday by Leger suggests that the tide may be turning on the UCP’s popularity – possibly as a result of its treatment of the province’s teachers.
“Teachers are viewed as responsible and credible, while the government faces mounting reputational challenges,” according to a summary of the results of the Oct. 10-12 survey, which suggested the UCP government’s support has fallen to 24 per cent, and moreover that 61 per cent of Albertans now think their government is on the wrong track.

Is this the beginning of the end of Dani’s dictatorship? I fervently hope so. Is her base now seeing her as a liability to the UCP winning the next election and will they give her a no-confidence vote at the AGM next month? Nobody’s quicker to stab each other in the back or turn on each other than the far right lunatics. Will her caucus turf her out, like Redford’s caucus did with her? After all, Trash Can Dan’s sins make Redford look like a saint. How much more is her caucus willing to put up with before they rise up against Dear Leader? Will the consciences of anyone at all in her caucus be pricked enough to lead some of them to sitting as independents? And why is Dani in Saudi Arabia to talk oil with them when they have their own oil? Will Thomas Lukaszuk become the leader of the newly rejuvenated Alberta Party/PC Party? If he does, they have an excellent chance of taking votes away from the UCP and from the moderate Conservatives out there who are sickened by the antics of this reincarnation of the fascist Wildrose party. Did Dani’s husband go with her to Saudi Arabia for these supposedly high-level talks? Or did he stay home because he’s only into trains, and not planes?
Marlaina is in Saudi Arabia for a free vacation and to escape having to answer any questions about her contempt for unionized workers.
Completely predictable, classic conservative cut ‘n run behaviour.
More than 450,000 signatures! Well done, Alberta. That’s not quite 10% of our total population, not any more, but should still be enough to demonstrate that many of us would prefer to remain within Confederation, thanks very much.
Math 101. The total number of votes cast in the last Alberta election was about 1,777,000. This petition gathered 456,000 signatures. That’s about 25.6%. While there are about 4.6 million Albertans, many are children who can’t vote, and others chose for a variety of reasons not to vote, and others still can’t vote (eg inmates). The number 456,000 is a very significant percentage of people who do matter. It’s a big number in a small place like Alberta.
Oh, absolutely. I didn’t mean to imply that less than 10% of the adult population eligible to vote had signed the petition. My point was just that a number approaching 10% of the total population is impressive, any way you slice it.
The fact that Smith is in Saudi Arabia, doing who knows what, is a symbol of what she thinks of Lukaszuk’s petition. Remember Smith et al. do not play fairly. Expect her to pull a fast one on this file so that she can get her way – which is what this government is all about. Smith must think it is her God given right to create discord, uncertainty, and create a reality that is as far from the truth as possible, in other words convey and create insanity where people do not know up from down, left from right, metaphorically speaking of course. Parker whispers into Smith’s ear and she does his bidding, but with her own particular despot, authoritarian, style of brimming incompetence. It is bewildering how the media cannot help themselves in giving Trump and Smith the limelight giving them undue credit. The irony is clearly remarkable – give voice to despots all the while the majority of the population is held hostage to a daily barrage of Trump, Trump and more Trump, oh wait Smith too. They love the limelight do they not? Except when they feel the public pressure from their misdeeds and that is when they conveniently travel. What a tax paying scam!
We need leadership in this province! Leadership that gives people actual hope, through a supportive government that actually governs for the people, not against them. Indeed the UCP is nothing but a divisive group of malcontents. Bring back renewables, invest in health care, education, and municipalities. Stop all the vitriol and work together with others, be inclusive not exclusive. Respect the natural world. Is this too much to ask? Is there not a shred of decency in any conservative these days? To answer the question with a “no” is to resign oneself to an ugly combative future; to answer “yes” is to remain hopeful that something can be done to turn the tide of the phenomenon that is international authoritarianism, otherwise we are surely doomed. However, is your average human now a teeth baring monster waiting for a place to happen? The answer is clearly “no” given the fact that Lukaszuk has organized a petition with enough supporting signatures to send a clear message to the frightened pusillanimous (those afraid of everything and everyone they do not agree with) UCP. We CAN hope for a better future can we not? Hellberta, the current laughing stock of Canada and much of the world, needs a new government, that way Hellberta can become Alberta again.
Smith’s playbook is trumps playbook…..
Is there a ‘is’ missing in the “Little Tommy” sentence (“I guess how”)?
Is the “Third, it boxes…” a question or statement.
Otherwise, I cannot argue with the monumental achievement Mr. Lukaszak has accomplished. Congratulations to him and all who stepped up to assist him.
Thanks, John. Both have been fixed. So has the “universal” that was supposed to say “unilateral.” DJC
Does this mean that Jason Kenney wittingly or unwittingly planted an Easter egg that could take down the “lunatics” “trying to take over the asylum”?
“I will not let this mainstream conservative party become an agent for extreme, hateful, intolerant, bigoted and crazy views,” he said.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/kenney-recording-ucp-alberta-leadership-review-staff-1.6396647
Well, they did. Revenge is a dish best served cold.
No, I suspect that the UCP / Reform / Social Credit just never learned from their past history. They did campaign in the 1930s on introducing recall legislation, and they did, first government in Canada to have one. But when it was used (to recall Calgary MLA William Aberhart), the Premier (William Aberhart) had his Attorney General (coincidently also William Aberhart) withdraw the law.
It was never meant to be used against the Social Credit then, or against it’s grandson the UCP today, so expect a lot of flak. Just like the fight now for the ‘Forever Canadian’ petition. Will Elections Alberta somehow not be able to certify it in 60 days because they don’t have the resources? Will danielle just dismiss it with a quick vote in the Legislature, and it’s done, then proceed with the seperatist agenda?
It’s becoming increasing clear, after the use of the Notwithstanding Clause against the teachers, that it’s “My Way or the Highway” only in the TBA/UCP Alberta view. I’m thinking that it might be the Highway for a lot of teachers in Alberta today, but that would play directly into the plans to privatize education here. But I would not blame any teacher that decides to change career or move to a place that respects education over ignorance.
AC/DC Highway to Hell playing now.
Perhaps the teachers could be present outside before and after school begins to talk to parents at this critical point to make sure they understand how bad the classrooms are for their children’s academic success before the parents start to buy into the UCP story that they got the kids back to school and how great that is.
Congratulations to Mr. Lakaszuk, job well done!
Well then, how about the NDP bringing Charlie Angus on board to put a cattle prod to our sleepy official opposition and raise the temperature in the room long before we get to the next election.
What a great idea!
Just wondering if there is anyone here who is able to comment knowledgeably on the Education Act, the section that regulates teacher certification.
It just seems to me that the Minister has a great deal of discretion to award or cancel teaching certificates and letters of authority. The Act is stuffed with language like this: ‘If the Minister considers it appropriate’, ‘acceptable to the Minister’, ‘in the opinion of…’ ‘notwithstanding’. Nicolaides seems very confident he will find his 3000 eager educators lined up for the promised FTE’s. And yes, we do know people without teaching qualifications hired to deliver specific courses in our public schools.
Also, what, if anything, would stop this government from opening up the section that requires teachers in the public, separate and Francophone school boards to be members of the ATA?
Not that it matters; the sledgehammer has been applied.
Does the general public or parents care if our teachers are trained in Canada, hold a Bachelor of Education, or Bachelor of anything, have relevant experience or whether they are union members?
Is the UCP banking on indifference and ignorance?
Congratulations to Mr. Lukaszuk and his dedicated volunteers. You stood up not only for Alberta but for all Canadians. Thank you.
And why is she off to Dubai? Who accompanied her? Was it in her official calendar? Is it a return ticket?
Did any members of the UCP caucus sign the petition?
Hopefully it’s a one way ticket and I doubt any of them signed it.
Wow, that’s just excellent. Well done Mr. Lukaszuk! I bet Smith’s cronies will be going over those signatures with magnifying glasses.
Next, one to overturn the “notwithstanding clause” ever being used in Alberta again as it’s been abused.
I keep checking the news to see what the unions are doing against this officious over-reach and as I said yesterday, “Why were they not prepared? They knew this was coming.” and so far, I’m massively disappointed in their response.
The least they could have done was start shipping bushels of rotten apples to Smith’s office in protest and started picketing (even if in their member’s off hours) in front of the schools in support. Let’s hope they pull their heads out of their asses and move on this before the entire country’s unions are gutted.
A right honorable Canadian…….doing the grassroot workings of what it takes to be real leadership….from the ground UP…..not the top down…..congrats to all involved…..CANADA 1st…….its the honorable thing……
My wife and I signed the petition at one of the first permanent locations in its first week of operation.
60 days until certification … that’s Dec 27. After the clown party’s AGM. So what is going to happen? Her separatists break up the frankenparty? She calls an early election?
One can only hope….
Alberta has an articulate, charismatic, hard-working, well-regarded, well-organized, well-informed person. He is a real leader, but he does not have a party. If Nenshi had a clue, he would stand aside and invite Thomas to lead his party. Otherwise, he remains an undertaker leading a herd of dinosaurs toward extinction. I believe there is sufficient common ground for this to happen. All I can do is wish.
Whoa whoa whoa, as much as I have always respects Thomas as a man of principles, and as much as I have real difficulty remembering how to spell his last name, he is nothing resembling a New Democrat. The man was literally the deputy premier under the PCAA banner. Does he deserve a pat on the back, absolutely. Should he be the next leader of the NDP? Those are totally different questions; and I would say no.
Thomas’ politics have moved to at least the centre since his time as deputy premier. The Alberta NDP has chosen a leader to at least take us into the next election. But I hope the Alberta NDP reaches out to him, because his political capital and profile have definitely risen due to his successful leadership of the Forever Canadian petition campaign.
Yeah, can’t see Lukaszuk going orange. Reviving the old big tent prog cons under a different name, that I can see.
Mr Lukaszuk is an illustration of the old chestnut that “politics makes strange bedfellows”. He was a bit of a bête noir to those of us on the left during his time in government; in fact, I’m sure either our host here, or his fellow blogger Daveberta posted some highly critical commentary about his policy decisions back in the spady, including on the education file — after all, he did a stint as Minister of Education, in the Redford Cabinet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Lukaszuk
But I get the distinct impression that today’s version of conservatism doesn’t appeal to him. That doesn’t make him a New Democrat. It just makes him politically homeless.
Hopefully Marlaina can’t invoke the notwithstanding clause to once again trample Albertans’ charter rights, but I’m sure she’s working on it from Dubai or wherever she is on her “hide from Albertans” taxpayer-funded getaway.
Really nice of Yankee Doodle Dani to jetset over to the Middle East, an area notorious for its lack of oil so it makes sense why she’s doing a trade mission there right ? Is it a feature or a bug that she happened to pick two slave states to visit though? That’s the real question.
Congratulations to all the hard working volunteers who pushed this project through to success. Props to Thomas Lukaszuk for his initiative and leadership, but it’s the foot soldiers on the ground who win these battles.
My father and grandfather fought in the two world wars, and they didn’t do so to allow a bunch of sleazy grifters to tear this country apart.
the potentate can undermine the results of the successful petition, the recall initiative, and its declining support for, by calling a snap election.
risk by doing so is the ag report on the gov’ts corruption with surgical suite contracts is unknown, the gerrymandering of the province’s constituencies hasn’t begun. but these risks may be worth taking by the entitled mob operating the regime, given how tough the environment is going to be over the next 16 – 24 months.
It’s a shame with his great success Mr. Lukaszuk didn’t have a second petition right along side the first to kick out (recall) Dingy Smith. My wife and I signed the petition at his event just off St. Albert trail shortly before he got started. While it was a really long line, maybe over 200, it moved fast and we got through in about 15 minutes because it was well organized and set up correctly. We are glad he exceeded his target as a result of many people working together to reach a goal and congratulate him and his team for their success. Now it’s up to Dingy and we will see what kind of malicious response she will no doubt have.
Maybe the AFL or others could start recall petitions in every riding that has an UCP MLA?
Perhaps a concerted effort to start recall petitions should be made to recall all UCP MLA’s, especially in the Calgary area. Flipping a half dozen seats or so would throw out the Premier and replace her with a much better choice.
Or…..
a boatload of separatists signed the petition, so that they could ride Thomas’ coattails to get a referendum to happen. Why not let your enemy do all the work?
And then they have a strong GOTV effort of people who will vote “No” to the question “Do you agree that Alberta should remain within Canada?”
“the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself” Sun Tzu, The Art of War
PJP – you are giving separatists too much credit!
@PJP
Sun Tzu was correct. Know why Dani keeps winning? Because those opposing her do not take the opportunities presented, to topple her or her agenda. Mr. Lukaszuk was smart enough to *immediately* charge through the opening start a petition, first. Sure, it could go pear-shaped but it’s always smarter to frame the debate from your side at the outset rather than let your opponent rule the airwaves.
Know who isn’t smart enough to see that? The unions. They knew she was going to invoke the notwithstanding clause for a week beforehand. That was the opportunity to set in motion the next steps against her. Mr. Lukaszuk was the one guy who showed some leadership and used her own weapon against her.
The unions didn’t.
They waited until she did it and now they’re “having conversations”. What’s there to talk about? You either are leading the charge, or you aren’t. Those people voted them in to do just that. Instead, they’re fiddling while Rome burns.
The Federal/Provincial governments uses siege warfare, not overt force. Any sensible activist knows this.
They starve out the population they’re fighting. The longer you give them to set up the mechanics of that siege, the worse position you’ll find yourself in. If you’re busy “having conversations” and planning to break up her cabinet over the long term–sure you can do that. But if you’re not actively busting up their siege machinery at the same time–it won’t matter how many supplies you squirrelled away in the basement. You’re never going to get the opportunity to eat them because you’ve locked yourself in the very constitutional castle with a giant gaping hole in it that can’t be ignored.
Time to fight on the field or that castle will be overrun and there will be no dictating the terms of surrender.
On the unions’ options, see my comment on our host’s previous post.
https://davidclimenhaga.wpcomstaging.com/2025/10/fundamental-rights-forget-about-em-danielle-smith-brings-down-the-hammer-on-albertas-striking-teachers/
The simplest solution to this “notwithstanding” nonsense that I can see is to have a trigger mechanism for constitutional judicial review like the one used when the War Measures Act is invoked.
It won’t scare the children and looks relatively benign to politicians. It would create oversight because no government should have the power to overturn their citizen’s rights at a whim. Look what’s happening to the south of us.
Therein lies the problem, here. It’s a get out of jail, free, card.
Otherwise the constitution is toilet paper, there are no “rights”–they’re just suggestions to be ignored whenever us uppity citizens’ demands are inconvenient.
Here’s the reality. Doing activism sucks. Leadership sucks. It’s risky. Same with being a union leader. As soon as your opponent knows that you won’t fight because there’s a penalty or the public might not like you–they’ll just keep pushing. Why do you think there’s no affordable housing in this country?
Paying the penalties is part of the gig, sadly. Bravery begats bravery. Cowardice begats cowardice. The willingness to sacrifice, matters. Ask the wobblies or anyone who actually had to fight for something when it wasn’t “the popular thing”. Fighting for LGBT rights got people arrested and fined. Fighting for the rights of assaulted women got people arrested and fined. Neither of those were popular fights to take on at the time we all took them on.
Sometimes you just have to push ahead doing the right thing and pray everyone else catches up later.
I forgot the UCP addendum to Hanlin’s Razor, “don’t ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupid…except when they are both malicious AND stupid”
Btw, Mr. C is great and all, but the Commentors here are marvellous too.
PJP: Excellent comments are encouraged here, and we have all been rewarded by the efforts of the marvellous commenters you praise. While it is time-consuming to moderate all comments, it is worth the effort, as I generally strive to improve the tone by removing comments that hare hateful, ignorant, potentially defamatory, off-topic or commercial come-ons. As many regular readers know, sometimes I edit comments to eliminate specific problems – usually what I judge to be defamatory material – but still leave their point intact. DJC
Hello DJC and fellow commenters,
Phenomenal work by Mr Lukaszuk and all who assisted in collecting the signatures.
Yes, Lukaszuk seems to have surpassed what many initially considered an insurmountable number. In itself this will create a lot of grief for Smith and the UCP who have been threatening Albertans and other Canadians with an independence referendum for a while.
However, it may do more than that. It could energize opponents the UCP, who have already become quite energized lately, even more. If organizers can get hundreds of thousands to sign, getting a bit over 16,000 in a Calgary constituency does not seem as hard now. So the Education Minister may soon become a big casualty of his own government’s actions.
The UCP has been out of step with Albertans and doing one unpopular thing after another for quite a while now. All of this may finally be catching up with them. So the Education Minister may not be the only one who may end up being hoisted by his own petard.
I believe that Danielle Smith et al should pay close attention to four things about this:
-the sheer number of forms presented
-the short time in which the forms/signatures were obtained
-the large number of volunteers willing to devote their time and energy to this
-the organizational effort behind the actual process
Danielle Smith pays attention to nothing except the marching orders she gets from the TBA bottom-feeders. She thinks she’s right. About everything. Period. She wants to remake Alberta into her own ideological utopia where she can reign as queen. She is not interested in governing. She’s an autocrat and autocrats want to rule; they don’t want to govern. She won’t for one moment entertain the idea that her opponents just might have a point; her instinct is to squash them because she is always right about everything. She’s been too busy her entire adult life drinking her own bathwater to ever be anything but a fascist loyal to her Randian ideology and that of her puppetmasters.
Let’s hope that they don’t so that they’ll be booted at the next election.
Some thoughts:
1. Anyone remember Danielle’s promise to call a referendum pronto if a petition showed enough Albertans were in favor of separating? That promise should still hold, or are we, the citizens, wrong to expect fair play?
2. Anyone remember when the WildRose party engineered Redford’s fall from power, over a tiny renovation? Gosh, how silly that expense seems now, compared to the rampant UCP grift and trips and costly patronages raiding our coffers. No other Premier in Alberta has ever, so openly and audaciously, ripped off taxpayers.
3. Speaking of patronages, I can’t wait to see what right-wing crony will be appointed to head up the education commission (yet *another* commission- is this the 4th? 5th? since 2023?) that will, just like those before it, for the cost of a cool few million, inevitably conclude exactly what Smith wants them to. I mean, why bother with the facade? She might as well just hand them the final report along with their contract and cheque, right there at the first photo op, and be done with it. Nobody is fooled.
4. Anybody else snort audibly when Mickey Amery accused Lukaszuk of “searching for relevance” with this petition? What a foolish comment to make, especially given Amery’s political pedigree! Because Lukaszuk has now proven he is indeed relevant, and that makes one conclude that it is Amery who is irrelevant. (Which as I write this seems very likely, given Danielle’s complete control over every single UCP MLA. They vote like lemmings…)
I was one of the many Forever Canadian canvassers and it was my pleasure to collect over 500 signatures. Obviously there was a range amongst us all, but it was a thrilling success to have been a participant.
Further to Kali’s comments on Amery; Mickey is in over his head and he seems to be lacking the ability to use good legal judgement, under the throes of the premier. I remind you of his deep involvement in the #CorruptCare fiasco. My expectation is that he will have his day in front of the Law Society.
What is now concerning is that Queen Danielle has decided to plaster the NWC on every policy document. It seems that the new ethics guidelines now have the NWC attached to them. Why? Just in case there’s something criminal, and the Clause is now a get out of jail free card? At some point, the trolling stops being annoying and just proves that things are not right in someone’s head.
Now, that Mango Mussolini has decided that it’s too hard to get the Peace Prize, he may as well start a war he can win. But make sure it’s a war with a country so small there’s no way it can defend itself. Venezuela, maybe that place. But it may also be that one place that could break Trump’s ambitions. Vietnam was supposed to be a cakewalk and look what happened.
Maybe Smith can raise a force of Alberta volunteers to help Trump, an Alberta Expeditionary Force. Alberta decides to invade Venezuela because it goes wherever Trump goes.
As for Tomas Lukaszuk, well done. And this maybe an entrée for the creation of another political party. Stay tuned.
JM: I think it’s important to note that while the new rules set out in an Order in Council (that is, a cabinet order) for gifts that can be accepted by members of ministers’ staffs contains a notwithstanding clause, it is not the Notwithstanding Clause, that is, the one in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In other words, the cabinet order provides a list of exceptions to the general rule that such government employees may not accept gifts. So the policy cannot be fairly described as a get-out-of-jail-free card. DJC
My point was that Smith likes NWC so much she’s introduced her own version of a notwithstanding clause. In other words, the UCP will pass any law, no matter how egregious or weird, just to show that they can do it and no one can stop them.
As for that ‘list of exceptions’ I have a feeling it’s blank.
@Just.
Yeah it’s giving me “executive-orders-signed-with-a-sharpie” vibes as well.