With more than 23,000 civil servants represented by the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees primed to strike, the ball is now in the United Conservative Party Government’s court.

At a noon-hour press conference yesterday, AUPE President Guy Smith announced the union’s strike mandate, which can only be described as resounding – 90.1 per cent approving strike action if necessary with 80 per cent of the unionized direct employees of the provincial government casting a ballot.
So, over the next four months, unionized government employees can walk out any time after 72-hours’ notice. Meanwhile, earlier this month the government applied for and received permission to lock out AUPE’s members in the event of a breakdown in negotiations. So the government theoretically could also pull the trigger after 72 hours’ notice.
At the union’s short news conference yesterday, Mr. Smith said AUPE had no intention of rushing into a strike. “We are determined to get a deal at the table.” Meanwhile, back at the Legislature, Finance Minister Nate Horner, responding to an Opposition question, stood up and said, “if they’re serious about coming back to the table, we’ll be there.”
But here’s the thing, at this point if the government is serious about actually getting a negotiated deal with AUPE, they’re going to have to stop taunting the union with offers symbolically lower than those in settlements with other unions, notably the public-sector deal with United Nurses of Alberta.
So the question at this point is whether the government of Premier Danielle Smith (who is no relation to either AUPE President Smith or UNA President Heather Smith) can act like grownups long enough to get a deal that won’t make it look as if they’ve fumbled another important file.

On the other hand, there are certainly players in the UCP Caucus who wouldn’t mind a fight with as union because they think they can simultaneously look tough and deflect attention from that dodgy contracts scandal, a measles epidemic, and the UCP’s march toward privatization in health care, all of which must be generating unease among voters.
However, as long as there are Liberals in power in Ottawa, this government would always prefer to focus on a fight with the feds, a factor that might incline the UCP toward trying to reach a deal with AUPE. Indeed, the government published yet another public statement yesterday complaining pointlessly about Prime Minister Mark Carney’s cabinet picks.
The union noted in a bargaining update for members yesterday that “we are currently dealing with an employer that has proven to be particularly uncooperative throughout this process. Recently, the Government of Alberta’s spokesperson dismissed our position as ‘rhetoric,’ despite the fact that we are advocating for wages that reflect the real inflation affecting our province.”
“We remain steadfast in our commitment to good faith negotiations and will continue to push for an equitable agreement,” the AUPE update said. “We call on the government to move beyond dismissive rhetoric and engage constructively with us to secure a fair and sustainable outcome.”
Another factor in these negotiations is that this is the first time Alberta civil servants have had a legal right to strike, thanks to the repeal in 2017 of unconstitutional legislation that had banned all public-sector strikes in Alberta.
So what’s likely going to be required to reach a deal?
Well, to move things forward, the government is going to have to up its offer at least to annual pay increases of 3 per cent a year over four years – which is what the government emphasizes in UNA’s agreement that was overwhelmingly ratified by the nurse union’s members in voting that took place on April 2.
In a statement on April 3, UNA explained that when the dust had settled, the new nurses’ agreement would result in “pay increases of approximately 20 per cent over the life of the four-year Provincial Collective Agreement, plus significant increases in premium pay and other benefits.”
But at least an offer of four years of 3 per cent annual pay increases could get things moving in the right direction, although some sweeteners for civil servants would still be required to reach a deal.
So far, though, the government has offered increases of 3 per cent, 3 per cent, 2.75 per cent and 2.75 per cent, which AUPE clearly views as insulting.
So stand by for developments.
Ric McIver, former Calgary city councillor and longtime MLA, named Speaker of the Alberta Legislature
With former Speaker Nathan Cooper off to serve as Alberta’s trade representative in Washington, veteran Progressive Conservative and UCP minister Ric McIver was elected Speaker of the Alberta Legislature yesterday.

Earlier in the day, Mr. McIver resigned as municipal affairs minister before defeating the Opposition NDP’s candidate, Edmonton-Manning MLA Heather Sweet, for the right to occupy the Speaker’s chair.
A Calgary city councillor from 1998 to 2010, when he left to unsuccessfully run for mayor, Mr. McIver has represented Calgary-Hays since 2012. He is an old time Tory – which is to say that while it’s often not obvious he may actually have a progressive bone or two in his body. As a result, it may come as something of a relief to him to no longer have to stand up in the Legislature and defend the Smith Government’s MAGA policies.
As Mount Royal University political scientist Duane Bratt observed on Twitter/X yesterday, “This is a big blow to the UCP government. McIver was a major fixer of problems.” And heaven knows, the UCP has created lots of problems that need fixing!
At 66, Mr. McIver will be in a position to retire after the next election if he feels like going out on a high note. In addition to the Canada Pension Plan, he’ll even qualify for an official portrait painted by an artist of his choice to be displayed in the Rotunda of the Legislative Building.
That Dr. No is now considered a “Progressive” Conservative reminds me how far the fascists have moved the Overton Window to the Right. (McIver thought Bronconnier was a big spending Liberal).
Sigh.
McIver? What an opportunistic nothing of a person.
So far looks like just another Dixie Dani stooge to me. Cutting off Guthrie’s mike while he was speaking.
I am surprised the UCP did not immediately remove the right to strike from employees like the Conservatives did in the Klein era, claiming all employees were essential. As I suspected and predicted earlier this year, things could get very ugly this summer. The UCP have no intention of negotiating, rather prefer to dictate. I see and hope at some point all of this will blow up in her face and we can be rid of her for good. One can only hope.
I watched Ric McIver in action for his first question period yesterday and it makes me wonder if he was ever awake during previous sessions. He really stumbled like he had no idea of the proceedings or what to do. Perhaps over the next little while he will figure out how things run?
OA: I too thought his performance was weak yesterday. I’m confident he’ll get better, though. Anyway, who could have predicted Peter Guthrie would stand up and try to hole the government below the waterline on Day 1 of Mr. McIver’s tenure in the chair? DJC
I was quite shocked at the approach Mr. Guthrie took, but certainly entertaining. Given his questions and tablings I find it hard to believe he will be asked to rejoin the UCP caucus.
Old, it’s already heating up.
There was an anti-separation protest last weekend that had 3-4x the amount as those who’ve been showing up at separatist protests.
Then the First Nations folk have been out there. That’s only gonna grow the longer this goes on. Wait until the Nations from other provinces show up plus supporters. Of course, the police will, at some point, start trampling their rights and it will end in the inevitable clashes.
Add in all the other protests against the scandals, disability entitlement gutting, housing problems etc etc.
It’s gonna be a long, hot, rage-fuelled summer.
PART I:
3% over 4 years is a pittance considering the inflation rates unless their paycheques already have an inflation clause. Even then, it’s not an unreasonable ask.
PART II:
If Dani’s “fixer” is gone and he’s also the voice of reason–let’s see how long it takes before the entire mess, implodes.
{{{passes popcorn around the comment section aficionados}}}
McIver seems to be following the Kowalski retirement plan, as a MLA the government doesn’t know quite what to do with, but can’t get rid of. I suppose almost the last thing the UCP wants now is another by election.
Alberta media could make their job easier by just cutting and pasting the words “Smith criticizes the Federal government yet again”. Despite the changes in PM, the new cabinet and even having an Alberta cabinet minister again, she now sounds like a broken record. More decent people might actually just congratulate the new people and leave it at that for a few days, but Smith does not do gracious well, if at all.
Perhaps Smith will be more reasonable with union negotiations now so she can continue train all her ire on the Feds instead. However, I would not be surprised if she gets even more bogged down in a Nixonian style multi front political war against almost everyone. She’s already got a health care gate scandal that continues to simmer and could still boil over to go along with a generally overly controlling, petty, and vindictive approach to things.
My absolutely most entertaining moment today was watching Smith claim that “my family is being maligned” then playing the victim card because the opposition was asking why her husband was in a private legislative meeting where they were discussing railways–when he isn’t a registered lobbyist? The amount of wiffle-fudgery the Speaker had to do to try and cover up that basic fact was a GoT script on steroids.
It’s hard to “stick to the point” when the point is obvious and you’re not allowed to say it because Dixie Dani feels hard done by.
Someone just bring their horse into Parliament, next time. Then maybe–everyone will get the point. Or at least those who can read.
B.— The CTV news clip only showed part of the “tense exchange”, while City news had “Alberta legislature erupts”….
I was amused by Marlaina’s stance; maybe she’s practicing for Stampede days, but the hands in the pockets looked like high noon @the Calgary corral and she was getting ready to draw.
Also, Joseph Schow, asking if the questioning should be taken outside, gave Mr McIver more practice in his new role. If he thought he had an easier job until summer break, he must be counting the hrs now.
Another curious clip I came across was Marlaina on with Western standard talking about using her “mandate” to pick a candidate to replace Nathan Cooper, even if they have separatist tendencies (?); and she would call for by-elections for the 3 openings at the same time. Hmmm?? Something to watch for.
Regarding the separatists….
Something that was pointed out to me years ago about polls and the agenda behind them: alot of people are fixating on the ‘1 in 4’ (25%)to the 36% (?) of Albertans want to separate–(imho buffalo cookies) but the main point being ignored is that 3 of 4 (75%) or even 64%
DO NOT WANT TO.
So when Premier Smith goes on another one of her tirades about protecting “Albertans” why is it that it appears to only be the minority that she is concerned about.
—-Referendum question—
Do the MAJORITY of Albertans want to stay as part of Canada [✔] YES.
Danielle Smith never saw a fight she didn’t join, even if it was obvious she couldn’t win. (I guess her dad never taught her to pick her fights.)
OTOH, maybe she’s jabbing the Federal Liberals because she can’t bury the CorruptCare scandal much longer. It’s the time-honoured tactic of “Look, what’s that?!”–then run away.
She won’t be able to run very far from the Oilberduh Separatist Dreamers, though. Smith knows she’s parked in the Big Chair because David Parker wanted Jason Kenney out for non-performance, i.e. not radical-right enough. Smith’s walking a tightrope that’s rapidly thinning to thread-like proportions.
The thread can’t snap soon enough.
Well, well. It’s not often I get something right about the UCP government. McIver trying for the Speaker’s chair was an exception. Yay me. (/s, in case it wasn’t clear)
McIver’s promotion may well increase Danielle Smith’s self-inflicted problems, although it might not be obvious. I wonder how many times McIver “fixed” relations between the TBA/ MAGA factions and the less purblind members (there has to be some. Doesn’t there?) of the UCP caucus.
Once he retires, Ric McIver can go back to hanging out with Art and no one will care. He should do it. The days of winning elections without showing up are over. Also, there’s always Cruisin’ the Dub in that PT Cruiser to fill those empty days.
https://calgaryherald.com/news/braid-mcivers-slow-apology-cant-erase-stain-of-anti-gay-association
Looking at the photo up top, not a cowboy hat among them. And they profess to call themselves Albertans!!!
Regarding Mr. McIver, while relatively competent, he is a little too Religiousy for me. See his affiliations with the outspoken Artur Pawlowski, March for Jesus, and other intolerant so-called Christian groups.
Whenever something like this happens, I wonder if Mr. McIver jumped or was pushed. It appears his salary will not change; both ministers with portfolio and the speaker get the same bonus, in addition to their MLA salary: $61,919.
So, did Mr. McIver want to get out of the cabinet nuthouse, or did Stormy Danielle want him out?
Bob: I’m sure he jumped. It’s an important and rightly prestigious position. Ric was a little shaky on Day 1, but I expect him to do OK. DJC
@DJC, mebbe it was his reward from Dani for *not* screaming out, “HALP! I am dealing with a RAGING LUNATIC!” in public…
…just sayin’
Bargaining can be fun! I’m sure it says so, somewhere in the fine print.
For example, AUPE’s update to members says, “we are currently dealing with an employer that has proven to be particularly uncooperative throughout this process.” That’s perfectly true, if you accept that the (nominal) employers, e.g. Alberta Health Services (or whatever’s left of it), Alberta Innovates, various universities and school boards, or any other “arm’s length” agency—are NOT the ones doing the bargaining.
Jason Kenney’s UCP government changed the rules so they could pull strings attached to the “employer’s” bargaining teams. Danielle Smith has come much closer to taking over the bargaining in public. This is pretty much the definition of bargaining in bad faith.
Question: Did Mr. Horner admit this implicitly by his statement in the Legislature? “[I]f [AUPE is] serious about coming back to the table, we’ll be there.” “WE”? As in Mr. Horner and other ministers? What happened, exactly, to those “arms-length” agencies that are supposed to do the bargaining?
Mike: You are correct about the UCP’s “secret bargaining mandates” legislation, which is clearly unconstitutional and which covers the vast majority of AUPE’s close to 100,000 members. However, in the case of direct employees of the Alberta public service – the 23,500 members covered by what AUPE calls its General Service Agreement – the GoA is the legal employer in fact and law as well as in deceptive unconstitutional practice. So when Mr. Smith speaks of an uncooperative employer, he is in fact properly speaking of the government. DJC
Correction noted, with apologies for getting that part wrong. I worked for a Crown corporation, not directly for the GoA.
Mike: No worries. It probably would have helped if I’d mentioned the full circa 100,000 membership – which makes AUPE somewhere between the 10th and 12th largest actual* union in the country, by the way. (*The Government of Canada’s list includes several labour central organizations like NUPGE and the AFL, which do not directly represent members in collective bargaining. This makes the list confusing.) DJC
originally from ontario – like so many of his federal and provincial peers – he wasn’t even in the province for 5 years before he got his shot at the trough. a career politician – i don’t believe i can describe any contribution he contributed to public policy that had a positive result for the majority of citizens of alberta.
I think the UCP are not going to last. They did it to themselves.
One confusing aspect of the current political scene in Alberta is that the most common surname in the English-speaking world is “Smith”. For this reason, one can’t tell the players without a programme.
Here is a partial list; I’m sure I’m missing at least one significant Smith:
– Alberta Premier Danielle Smith
– former Premier’s Chief of Staff Marshall Smith (who is now suing former AHS CEO Athana Mentzelopoulos, the Globe & Mail, one of their reporters, and a defendant to be named later, for “defamation”)
– Alberta Union of Provincial Employees President Guy Smith
– United Nurses of Alberta President Heather Smith
Lol.