Hey, 12-year-olds in Alberta will soon be able to hunt without adult supervision using laser targeting devices on their hunting rifles!

What could possibly go wrong?
Parks and Forestry Minister Todd Loewen is at it again, introducing legislation that draws on a deep well of bad ideas about wildlife management and by all appearances a desire to protect the interests hunting guide businesses like the one in which he owns a share – although the minister believes, he has stated on numerous occasions, that he has established there is no conflict.
Unsupervised pre-teens hunting alone or in packs and the legalization of laser targeting for hunting will be possible as soon as Bill 41, the Wildlife Amendment Act, 2025, is pushed through the Legislature by the United Conservative Party majority, which of course is exactly what will happen.
There are other dubious ideas in Mr. Loewen’s effort to “modernize” the province’s hunting legislation, but those two are striking because in addition to being problematic for the management and preservation of Alberta wildlife, they present a serious threat to public safety.
In addition, the passage of Bill 41 will allow: a reduction in the required draw weight of hunting bows to make them more accessible to children (also a threat to public safety); the province to issue digital licenses and electronic tags (presumably downloaded from the Internet); hunting of cougars for meat without preserving their hides (is it just me, or do others wonder who would wish to eat a cat?); use of leashed dogs to track wounded game (and, inevitably, unleashed dogs to track unwounded game); and allowing hunters to shoot from wheelchairs (which seems fair if impractical but may well be a legislative step toward allowing hunting from motorized vehicles).

Indeed, another change would permit hunters to shoot game from an unanchored motor boat, as long, the minister piously told CBC Edmonton AM host Mark Connolly in on-air interview, as the boat is at a standstill.
C’mon, though. Anyone who has ever been in a boat knows that even with the engine off, it will continue to move, especially in a current. Shooting from a boat as an inherently dangerous and irresponsible practice.
As for the use of laser sights, a military invention, Mr. Loewen blew off a question by bewildered-sounding Mr. Connolly, saying, “this is all just about aiming, and encouraging, giving people opportunity to use safe and humane kills when it comes to hunting.
“You know,” he bloviated, “we have open sights, iron sights when it comes to rifles and things like that. We have scopes, and this is just one more tool to use, to aim, to take game safely and humanely. It’s all about aiming …”
In a long-winded news release that opens with an ode to how “Alberta is home to the most stunning and diverse landscapes in the world, and hunting and trapping are integral to Alberta’s cultural heritage,” Mr. Loewen promotes the idea that the planned amendments to the Wildlife Act are mere modernization, “ensuring that hunting, trapping, and wildlife management practices remain effective, sustainable, and aligned with technological advancements.”

The changes will “support the long-standing cultural heritage of hunting in our province, while prioritizing the health of our ecosystems and wildlife populations for future generations,” Mr. Loewen insists in his canned quote.
Burying the lead in a press release and starting instead with a rambling paean to Alberta’s supposedly distinct society and magnificent scenery is a sure tell the UCP is about to try to pull the wool over our eyes.
Indeed, the news release never outlines what the proposed changes to the Wildlife Act will be, only tells us why they’re a wonderful idea. Supporting quotes are all from organizations associated with hunting, not from the broader range of wildlife conservation and preservation groups.
The task of explaining what the legislation really means was left to Jack Farrell of The Canadian Press, who took the trouble to dig out what was actually being proposed by the minister, and honed in on wheelchair hunting and children with hunting rifles in his story and in questions during Mr. Loewen’s news conference – much to the annoyance of the UCP, I have no doubt.
Professional Biologist Lorne Fitch told AlbertaPolitics.ca: “Any time this government uses words and phrases like ‘common sense,’ ‘ethical hunting and trapping,’ ‘simplify,’ ‘effective and efficient,’ ‘world class,’ and ‘modernize,’ Albertans should put up their BS antennae.”
Mr. Fitch – an author, university lecturer and occasional contributor to this blog – said in an email he is skeptical the changes in the act amount to “ground shaking stuff to enable Alberta to be a ‘world leader’ in wildlife management.
“What would do that is tackling the out of control footprint of industrial development that impinges on fish and wildlife habitat and populations and will … end up reducing populations and ending hunting,” he said.
“Making hunting more accessible is backwards,” Mr. Fitch continued. “What is required is to ensure we have robust, healthy wildlife populations by protecting and managing their habitat.”
To that end, Mr. Fitch suggested, the government would do better to take measures to control the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease among ungulates like deer and elk and end the use of bounties on predators like cougars and coyotes.
“Perhaps the act should be renamed the Hunting Act, because virtually all of the changes and revisions are about hunting, not about wildlife management, wildlife protection or the other users of the wildlife resource,” Mr. Fitch concluded.
The NDP’s response seemed half-hearted. Opposition Environment Critic Sarah Elmeligi, a PhD conservation scientist, told the CP mildly that the bill includes some necessary updates but complained that “Minister Loewen has already set a dangerous precedent with his attacks on Alberta’s wildlife, and this bill does nothing to reverse course or address the concerns of Albertans.”
She was referring to Mr. Loewen’s decision last fall to lift limits on trapping wolverines, lynx, river otters, and fishers.
Under the federal Firearms Act, which the UCP changes may be intended to undermine, most children and youths between 12 and 17 who want to hunt must possess a Minors Licence, which requires them to take the Canadian Firearms Safety Course and pass the tests. Exemptions may apply to Indigenous youth or those who hunt and trap as a way of life.
The Alberta RCMP page on Minors Licences seems to draw on federal and provincial law in simplified form without explaining the source.
It says, “before you can get a Minor’s Licence, a Firearms Officer may interview you or your parent or guardian. Your parent or guardian must first agree and consent to the conditions under which you may use firearms.” This is a reference to section 58 (2) of the federal act.
The RCMP page also says, “A minor can still use firearms of any class without a licence if they are under the direct and immediate supervision of someone who is licensed to have that firearm. The licensed person should be near enough to the minor to take immediate action to prevent any unsafe or illegal use of the firearm.”
This would appear to be a reference to section 31 (1) of the Alberta Wildlife Act, which Bill 41 will repeal.
“The changes will ‘support the long-standing cultural heritage of hunting in our province, while prioritizing the health of our ecosystems and wildlife populations for future generations,’ Mr. Loewen insists in his canned quote.”
Does Alberta have “long-standing culture of hunting”? Maybe, hunting was necessary for survival in the old days, but I am not sure that very many residents hunt and see it as part of their culture to-day.
Hunting as this government sees it is for the purpose of killing off wildlife rather than preserving wildlife. Their rules attack some species that probably are not doing well, for example wolverine. Killing them supposedly will tell us how many there are, which is an irrational suggestion.
As Lorne Fitch points out, a major problem for the survival of wildlife is destruction of their habitat. The UCP government seems to have no interest in protecting wildlife habitat. There are so many examples that we are aware of.
And why would you give 12-year-olds this amount of freedom with respect to hunting? Who will be responsible for proper/legal storage of firearms that they use and the ammunition?
Most of these ideas hardly seem “modernizing”, but rather encouraging as much success in killing wildlife as possible, with the result that wildlife will have a difficult time surviving at all. You would think that, in view of current knowledge of wildlife, the modern concept would be to ensure the continued existence of wildlife populations, not the opposite that the UCP government seems intent on causing.
Will Loewen be prepared to take responsibility when the first child is murdered because if his stupid law? Oh, right, TBA cult members are immune from accountability. Let the shooting begin!
I am completely speechless. If my kid can’t drive a car until he is 16 and meet probationary requirements, who in their right mind thinks that a 12 year old should be allowed to wander into the forest with a weapon that can kill at great distances? There is something inherently wrong with the entire UCP.
Debrah: I agree. This is so foolish.
As usual, this UPC government under Daniel S***, is pro exploitation of everything they can get their hands on. It is scary, to to the UPC become so aligned with Trump, they are willing to do anything to appease their master.
Loewen should have hung a banner behind the stage, “This Legislation Bought and Paid for by The Old Boys Hunting Lobby”. Perhaps a sub heading noting Geneses 1:28, throwing a bone to their other base. Twelve year olds running around the forest with laser sights on high powered rifles, what could possibly go wrong? We would have Lord of the Flies with some proper ordnance!
How sad. How many hunters (active, licensed folks who crawl around the woods) are there in Alberta? How many personnel (federal & provincial) are there to regulate the slaughter? How many NDP supporters are there who hope that Nenshi replaces some/all of his advisors?
square highway 22 west to highway 23 east , nanton in the north and waterton river south covered by 2 wildlife officers …. so a few and damn few.
I think it is time we invite 12 year old to come run this province. It is clear adults are not capable anymore. Why are we still hunting anyway?
Leave whatever we have left alone and let them live their natural lives.
“why are we still hunting anyway”
– are you stupid?
Vanilla: I would judge from this answer, which I’m going to permit because doing so serves a certain purpose, that it’s you who are not very bright. This is not to say there is no value in hunting, but why don’t you make the effort to explain your point of view? You know, if you don’t think “why are we still hunting” is a reasonable argument, why don’t you man up and present a reasonable argument in favour of hunting? DJC
Since they won’t explain it, maybe this would help.
Rural people on limited incomes often hunt to supplement their food sources, including First Nations’.
There used to be a program in BC whereby hunters who did not need all the game they hunted, would give the rest to food banks. Knew a lady there whose kids were saved from a very bad month by the kindness of a bear roast. I believe this practise has stopped officially, although I suspect unofficially–this is still a food source for many people. Add in the use of skins, bones, antlers and other pieces that are used in various crafts and furnishings.
Not a hunter, not even a fan but I’ve been known to have cooked and eaten a few moose/venison stews, back in the day.
Given what’s coming at us in the next cycle thanks to what’s happened south of us, I suspect more of us will be eating game, soon.
That said, 12-year-olds with guns? Uh, no. If you’re not old enough to drive, you’re not old enough to hunt without adult supervision.
This is the sort of nonsense you get when the most incompetent and inappropriate people are given cabinet positions.
It’s bad enough that the minister is in an obvious conflict of interest, now he’s putting Albertans in danger.
Jesus. No … just no.
Fair disclosure:
I own firearms, I have been a big game hunter. I have even been a provincial hunting association executive and was also a long term local hunting association executive.
When my son first expressed an interest in hunting with me, we went out together, he without a firearm or bow. I figured if he still wants to hunt after seeing just how much work it can be, then he will get the training.
Which he did – Alberta Fish & Game Association hunter training and Canadian Firearms. And he used my firearms, under my direct supervision, until he was 18. When he complained, my guns, my rules. I was still the responsible adult (morally, ethically, and legally).
There is not a 12 year old on this planet who has the maturity to be responsible with a firearm. And frankly, some 18 year olds (and older) are questionable.
Gerald: I shake my head at the stupidity of the UCP. Todd Loewen also claims that he is matching federal legislation. What federal (Canadian) legislation allows 12 year old children to go hunting without adult supervision? What happens when the child gets hurt, or killed, from different factors, due to increased risks? Who will be held accountable?
@anonymous
There is no federal legislation allowing unsupervised minor usage of firearms. As our host pointed out, the federal firearms act rules them all.
Loewen & Smith can try with this sneaky, underhanded & weasel like end run, but they will fail. Only question is will it be a Supreme Court or federal government smackdown?
Personally, I would love to see our Lt. Governor deliver the sit down and shut up, but unfortunately, I think she won’t have grounds to do so.
Gerald: I don’t think the LG has the grounds in this case. Like Chicago’s famous “ugly man law,” a “stupid legislation ban” would be hard to enforce fairly. Here in Alberta, of course, it would probably result in the Legislature having to be shut down entirely. The federal Firearms Act probably needs an upgrade, though, to clarify the rules around adult supervision of minors engaged in hunting, target shooting and other firearms-related activities. DJC
Big YAY here from me, Gerald.
Gonna need more of those special needs EA’s in our schools…
We had an outdoor education program at a Junior High in my small city. Included in the program was 22 caliber target shooting at the local outdoor gun range. Even with training by an expert, and close supervision a 14 year old managed to get shot. Fortunately no permanent harm resulted other than the ending of the program. Perhaps if some of the folks advocating for this legislation could meet the requirements to work with young people they would have an idea about the Shenanigans that can sometimes occur.
Dishonesty and incompetence are two of the most important prerequisites for employ in the tRumpublican party so it’s not surprising the UCP, the Canadian junior league of tRump’s CPC farm-team in Ottawa ( captained by one of the Orange Potato-head , Pierre Poilievre) includes them. But how does Alberta have the most diverse scenery in the world? (Study statement #1, Scotty…)
This is just another tool making Alberta Montana North. How can Alberta become a 51st state, with all the requisite school shootings, if we don’t put weapons equipped with laser targeting in the hands of children?
“While we’re at it, we will legalize the right for minors to possess revolvers with one cartridge in the chamber. Minors should have the right to play the fun game of Russian Roulette” Minister Loewen did not say.
I have yet to see any sensibility from right wing politicians who espouse the term “common sense.”
These people are idiots.
Seems like a April Fools joke?
And these 12-year olds just spent 5-7 years playing shooter video games. And if a 12-year old kills a human, what is the punishment? Detention?
Why 12 and not 10 years of age? Why not go all the way and allow all, regardless of age? After all, I’m not sure a 12 year old has all the mental and emotional development to handle a weapon that can kill so easily.
Btw, why do these far right/con male politicians almost always wear wigs? Who are they trying to fool?
David: It does rather look like a rug, doesn’t it? But one of reasonably good quality, not just a piece of carpet cut with pruning shears and glued to the ministerial scalp. Perhaps it’s made from the hide of a legally trapped wolverine? DJC
You may, or may not. Gimme back my wig! Now I could play an aversion, the only real one, but, here it is https://youtu.be/18JZ3UQrGbk?t=18 A twofer! Just for you sir! https://youtu.be/_aHzbptF8ro Does anyone know? Does anyone see? Does a little hedge need semaphore?
Yeehaw. Welcome to ‘Burda. We sure are gettin more Murican than Murica. In just six years them kids’ll be votin fer us.
Hunting deer with laser-guide munitions.
The next thing, you will be able to hunt deer with a 2,000 lbs JDAM.
Kill it, fillet it, cook it, all in one go.
This is so flawed and wrong, on so many levels. Giving a child a firearm is asking for trouble. Twelve year old children do not have the mental and physical capacity to be handling a firearm. They are out in a very remote area, which has a rugged landscape, such as a bog, a steep hill, or dense bush, and they trip, and hurt themselves, or get stuck in the bog. Bears, wolves, coyotes, or other wild animals could chase them and attack them, leaving them dead. Their firearm could malfunction and they could get hurt or killed from it, if they try to fix it themselves. Even in remote areas, there could be bad people around, who would harm the child. How would help arrive in time? Why can’t a twelve year old drive a car? There are certain things that a child should not be doing, and handling a rifle is one of them. The UCP are out of touch with reality.
I’ll just leave this here. Our Premier is playing with fire now. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a64210925/trump-annex-canada-border/ Does she even know what a dynamite room is? Let alone why there’s a no smoking sign on the door? Buy the gentle lady a book!
“…who would wish to eat a cat?”
A dog, perhaps?
Lars: Good point, although most of the dogs I know would rather just chase a cat, or maybe bite it a couple of times. My point, of course, is that the “for meat” argument is just a cover for trophy hunting. DJC