Finance Minister Nate Horner rose in the Alberta Legislature yesterday afternoon and delivered a Budget Speech with a split personality that reflects the rock and the hard place the United Conservative Party Government has found itself between.

Speaking in a monotonous drone inside the Legislative chamber as more than 2,000 striking public education workers and their supporters exuberantly chanted their derision on the steps of the building outside, Mr. Horner had the unenviable task of explaining that Alberta is once again the poor little rich kid of Confederation facing a looming financial crisis while also appearing to be calm, capable and in control.
The result was a bi-polar budget that delivers a long promised income tax cut that’ll cost $1.2 billion in the 2025-26 fiscal year, but also warns that hard times are comin’ round once more. Stern measures may be required.
Whether this will allow the UCP to muddle up the middle remains to be seen. Let’s face it, the Alberta government is a hot mess right now under the leadership of Mr. Horner’s boss, Premier Danielle Smith.
It’s mired in an ugly and persistent dodgy contracts scandal while proceeding full-steam ahead with related plans to tear apart and privatize the province’s public health care system. One cabinet minister has already quit over the contract allegations and there may be more to go. (The premier replaced former infrastructure minister Peter Guthrie yesterday with West Yellowhead MLA Martin Long.)
The government is also facing a stiff economic headwind from that American politician Premier Smith and many of her MLAs admire and support, and in at least one case went south to help elect.

And the government’s own prediction that oil and gas revenue will continue to tumble, $4.4 billion in the current fiscal year, is unchanged.
The government’s also been meddling in negotiations with more than 250,000 increasingly riled up public sector employees, like the more than 6,000 employees of nine school boards, many of whom were at the steps of the Legislature Building yesterday, represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees. And while a general strike of public sector workers is unlikely, it wouldn’t be impossible if the UCP keeps pushing their buttons the way it has been.
Mr. Horner, who is about as colourful as a Charlie Chaplin movie and not as entertaining, delivered his speech in the style of an airline pilot calmly telling his passengers not to worry, even though the port engine conked out half an hour ago and there’s just an itty-bitty problem with the starboard landing gear. “Experience has prepared us for whatever may come our way,” he intoned. Now, if you’ll just assume the crash position …
One thing that will come our way, it turns out is – quelle horreur – a deficit!
“Budget 2025, if passed, will have a deficit of $5.2 billion,” the finance minister said with a virtual shrug and ho-hum. But that could jump to $8.7 billion in the worst case, the budget documents admitted, if not the speech or the press release.

That said, Mr. Horner delivered the news without the deficit panic characteristic of Conservative politicians. This contrasts dramatically with the Conservative hysteria in 2018 when the NDP projected a worst-case deficit almost identical to the UCP’s 2025 prediction. Well, folks, that was then and this is now.
The official name of yesterday’s budget address: Meeting the Challenge. Between the lines, though, Mr. Horner’s message was, Just trust me, we’ll muddle through like we always do. Accordingly, I’m calling Budget 2025 The Muddlin’ Through Budget.
As predicted, it turns out this is mostly those Trudeaus’ fault. Don’t forget, Mr. Horner reminded us, about those “damaging federal policies, from Trudeau the Elder’s National Energy Program in the 1970s to Trudeau Junior’s production cap, impact assessment act, and tanker bans today.”
There are also, he admitted momentarily, “the potential tariffs from the U.S. administration.” But that is “a phenomenon that is both new and old.” So don’t worry about it, I guess. The premier will think of something.

In contrast to the new eight-per-cent tax rate on income under $60,000, the budget also hikes the education portion on municipal property taxes enough to eventually cover one-third of education funding – virtually guaranteeing that those progressive municipal politicians the UCP so hates will get blamed this fall for the increase.
Now, maybe it was just me misinterpreting things, but Mr. Horner did seem to telegraph a willingness to find a little more money to settle with those increasingly cranky public sector unions.
Explaining how the government always puts a bit aside to deal with unscheduled disasters, natural and unnatural, Mr. Horner said, “this year we have significantly increased that amount to potentially address the uncertainty around tariffs, and the uncertainty around public bargaining settlements.”
So, does this mean the government will come across with enough dough to ensure peace in the valley? Or is this just the cost of bringing Elon Musk in as a consultant?
On the other hand, there’s not even a hint the government will change its destructive health care policies – that slow-motion train wreck is obviously Premier Smith’s hill to die on.
Well, I’ll leave you with this gem from Mr. Horner’s speech, which really should have been polished up a bit before it was placed in its setting:
“We stand on the shoulders of giants, hopefully we can finally rectify the mistakes of the past and meet the challenge of the moment, and other provinces can permit the free flow of goods from coast to coast to coast.”
So just who are we blaming here? The giants? Are the Trudeaus giants?
The context gives no hints.
DJC— Re: the headline….I’m perplexed….did you intend to have another picture that included Nate & Danielle? Is that why she looks confused?
Okay, sorry, not sorry, I couldn’t resist; mainly because she has the Alberta face and then the Maple Maga face.
I suppose we should be grateful that Mr Horner didn’t bring up having to circumsise* the budget the way that d’rump did in his meeting…..lol
(*S.Colbert)
And correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the initial campaign promise of the $750 an outright payment, not just a tax break?
I can’t find the file.
Randi-lee: I’m not sure and I don’t have the time today to try to look it up. Ms. Smith is a serial liar. It’s quite possible she promised both. DJC
The easy days are certainly over for the Smith regime. The high oil prices fron just before the last election, now a distant memory, are gone. The AHS scandal she wishes would be gone, continues. The budget may provide a bit of a reprieve or distraction, but I suspect we will get back to that persistent scandal soon.
It is hard to make what this budget is really about, except perhaps setting us up for more austerity. If it were not for the contingency reserves and the tax cut, we would be not too far from a surplus. Odd that last year with the big surplus we were told we could not afford a tax cut and this year with a deficit we can. I suspect some of Smith’s supporters threatened to hold feet to the fire for all her delay and dithering in keeping her tax cut promise.
It is hard to claim to be good fiscal managers with such a large expected deficit, not the largest, but still noticeable. Without high oil prices and royalties the illusion of fiscal competence in Alberta quickly fades. At least the oil price projections are not overly rosy and a bit below current levels, so it is plausible they could turn out better.
I suspect the big projected deficit will be used to go on a cutting spree over the next several months. Obviously, they did not get as far as they wanted with cuts over the last several months. So fasten your seatbelts it may continue to be a bumpy ride.
Had these phony Conservatives and Reformers not been tampering with the proper oil and tax rates that Peter Lougheed was getting, and didn’t waste so much money on many very pricey shenanigans, we wouldn’t be in this horrible mess.
Hmmm??
David Braid/ EJ
>>> A small clause in the budget that transfers ‘ownership’ of AHS property, hospitals, clinics and other ancillary holdings to ‘Invest Alberta’.<<>>and now, according to the budget, other legislative amendments will permit property owned by health entities to be transferred to Alberta Infrastructure on April 1st 2025 , rather than being ‘owned’ by the entities <<<<
Split personality??
IMHO sounds more like Hydra.
Quote " now Guthrie's former ministry can sell it off ,and the money goes to general revenue"
•Is this possible??
Yes, Randi-lee, it is possible. And it is part of Ms. Smith’s plan. The only way to stop it is to elect another government. DJC
Earlier today, after reading DJC’s column a picture of Mordor (Dark Lord Sauron) came to mind, with Ms Smith stamping her staff on the floor: “I will destroy AHS!”
Yes, Long does look terrified. Much too young to be saddled with all the responsibility and of course Smith could tie all the “errors” of contracts to him, but a cabinet minister does make more than a MLA. The kid must have a death wish.
Speaking of death, Smith looks like death warmed over as we used to say. Didn’t her mother tell her to not make a face like that or it could stay like that. Don’t know what she is thinking or if she is actually thinking. She looks pissed about something, you can really see it in her eyes. She is angry. Perhaps she wanted to read the speech or she isn’t getting enough camera time.
Sure would like to know what she is so “unhappy” about.
e.a.f.: If Ms. Smith wants to read the budget speech, she should do as the late and sorta great W.A.C. Bennett of British Columbia did: declare herself to be both premier and finance minister. DJC
I do remember those days, now that you remind me!
It’s more than a little lame to reach back 50 years for someone to blame. Look in the mirror, as the late Jim Prentice said. Thank goodness he didn’t blame it on Xavier, or Xavier’s future children and grandchildren.
A tax cut and a deficit in the same budget; the Danielle Smith incompetence continues.
So, we start with a leader well known for saying anything she thinks her audience wants to hear (the unvaccinated are the most discriminated against group she has ever seen). Then add a promise of a tax cut because it sounds good in an election campaign. Finally, add a base who don’t want to admit they were stupid enough to believe the leader, so they hold her to her promise, so they don’t have to face up to the fact that they were taken in, yet again.
You can’t help but compare this situation to the deficits the NDP ran in their too short time in government. The NDP insisted on maintaining public services while oil prices were low, and deficits accumulated as a result. Roughly one quarter of our current deficit, by comparison, has occurred because we have a premier that speaks before she thinks.
The government may try to spin this as an attempt to help out low wage earners, but that is misleading. All tax payers will enjoy the reduced rate, even the rich. People earning a million dollars a year will only pay 8% on the first $60,000 of their million before they go up to the next tax bracket.
Here is some number crunching for my fellow math nerds:
The tax cut will reduce the provincial tax everyone who earns more than $60,000 pays on the first $60,000 of their annual income by 2%, when it drops from 10% to 8%, which is $1200, or a bit more than $23 a week. Meanwhile, as of Sept 1 of last year, the provincial government report the average Albertan earned approximately $1350 per week. It makes me wonder how many people will even notice the tax cut that produced a quarter of the deficit. Sadly, people who really need the help because they earn less than $60,000, won’t even see all of that $23 per week.
https://economicdashboard.alberta.ca/dashboard/average-weekly-earnings/
If we truly want to help the poor and the working classes, we need to increase the Basic Personal Exemption, raise the minimum wage, increase AISH and Alberta Works benefits, and slash utility bills. Among other measures.
Same ole same ole from the TBA cult leaders and their voting base will lap that up like the good doggies they are..
“Giants”? Kenney? “rectify the mistakes of the past ” does he mean the ones he and Dani have made over the past couple of years since they took office?
Seems like speech writing has the same poor quality as everything else the UCP has touched.
Roger: The quality of Conservative speechwriting in Alberta has been consistently poor for generations. In half-hearted defence of the UCP, though, nobody did it worse than the Klein government. The typical Klein era budget speech read like it had been written by the minister’s nine-year-old niece or nephew. “… making Alberta the very best place in the whole wide world … ” DJC
I took a look at the Bigfoot Family movie poster. Bigfoot appears to be as tall as a (grizzly?) bear standing on its hind legs. Also, another movie poster calls him “gigantesque”. Consider that fact checked: “on the shoulders of giants”.
The budget is a delusional mess. The government should focus on program and org reviews to reduce spending and do whatever it takes to ensure none of the $4B contingency goes to contract settlements.
The only way to wean the Province from non-renewable resource revenues is to sharply reduce operational spending.
The real threat from Trump is not tariffs. He could succeed in redirecting large amounts of capital investment into the US from the rest of the world. To remain competitive, Alberta (and Canada) will need to clean up its finances, streamline regulation and lower taxes.
Can’t disagree about the delusional mess part.
However: reducing spending can at most be part of the solution. They can certainly stop giving funding to private schools, and wasting it on boondoggles and other projects.
The way to wean the province for non-renewable resource revenues is to implement a fairer taxation scheme instead of bringing in tax cuts. If we have tax rates at the average rate for Canada (both income and sales) a large part of this deficit would vanish.
Tariffs are a threat (and may only be being used as just that). As for redirecting large amounts of capital and investment to the US, well the reason it left the US in the first place is labour was cheaper (and more efficient and harder working) in many industries when they relocated to other countries. That can’t be reversed in a hurry. Also the US finances are in worse shape than Canada’s based on Gross debt as a % of GDP. Streamlining regulation and lowering taxes can be a recipe for disaster as was shown in Kansas.
DC, as always, thank you for reading this stuff so we don’t have to. I guess we should avoid disability shaming, but I would suggest “bi-polar budget” is not the right descriptor. Try this from the BC Mental Health Asssociation’s page on Borderline Personality Disorder: “Unstable behaviour means that you often act on impulses or urges, even when they hurt you or other people.” A pretty apt description of Danielle Smith’s government.
Duly noted, Simon. Sometimes the poetry of the DSM-5 just gets the better of me. I have now read the manual’s description of bi-polar and you are quite correct, it is not the right metaphor. I will leave it in place in this instance with this explanation because it’s out in the world now, reposted and reprinted. But I will try to do better in future. Alas, the Borderline Personality Disorder Budget just doesn’t have such an evocative ring. I’m sure I’ll come up with something, though. DJC
Alberta needs to reorganize its royalties and income tax systems to get off this deficit roller coaster. As to which giants Nate is referencing, I am pretty sure it is Conservative premiers from Klein forward who set up a flat income tax and reduced oil royalties, leading to an empty treasury. Truly giants of munificence for the petrol corporations.
Rachel Notley had deficits because there was no oil money at all at the time. These geniuses even with oil money cannot avoid deficits. The same 43 old story that does not seem to affect the 46% that support this bunch of rare zoo animals.
Nate Horner ! I don’t have to say much about the groomer of harm
Numbers and scientific facts don’t lie. But it seems the UCP does! The only reason we’re in financial trouble is because we elect crooked and incompetent self-serving morons to spend our money! Piss it all away is their brand! How many “conservative” parties does Ms Sith need to destroy to prove my point? Three strikes? You’re out?
Hello DJC and fellow commenters,
Thanks for pointing out the clause about transferring ownership or hospitals, clinics etc. to Invest Alberta. this makes me very concerned that this is a way to enable sale of all these facilities, probably to the private for-profit sector.
How much they pony up for a certain millionaire THIS TIME !? asking for a province.
It was nice of them to give us tax break, I think Global said $1.2B and then they take it all back and more, in property taxes. I think global said $1.4B. That’s $200m difference, if my math is correct. So why bother with a tax break. People are happy that they’ll have more money in their pocket, but with the higher property taxes, businesses will need to charge more for groceries, alcohol, clothes, rent, etc. So how is this a tax break?
This one is for all your commentariat, but especially for you! Watch the whole thing, then send it out to every Ukrainian, whether they be century old residents or refugees. Our government is willing to sell our/their lives for oil company profits! https://youtu.be/h3WD9CUNgEE?t=44
One aspect of oil & gas revenues that I haven’t seen discussed is how Trump’s tariffs might in fact be good for Alberta’s revenue picture. Hear me out.
Alberta’s government, like all governments in Canada, budgets in Canadian dollars. But oil & gas are priced in US dollars, so any drop in the loonie against the greenback benefits our exports. Tariffs are widely expected to tank the value of our currency, so each US dollar of oil & gas revenue will be worth more in Cdn$ than it is now.
Oh, and by the way, I wonder how far our country’s GDP will drop with a 25% tariff? Will it be enough that the amount we currently spend on the military will suddenly meet that bogus 2% threshold because our GDP went down, not because we spent more? 😉
$5.2 billion deficit and what have they actually accomplished???
Debrah: A very good question, since this seems to be the result of the UCP governing through a period of relatively strong government revenues. By contrast, we know what the NDP accomplished with its deficits, which the UCP made such a fuss about, up to 2018. It kept the government’s lights on and the province running in a period when royalty revenues all but collapsed, responded effectively to emergencies like the Fort Mac fire, and by working with the federal government even got a pipeline built by working co-operatively with the federal Liberals, which no Conservative government federal or provincial has been able to do. The UCP, but contrast has launched a full-scale, frontal assault on public health care and given a lot of money to close friends And the only government they want to co-operate with is the one led by Donald Trump. Not much of an accomplishment. DJC