Premier Danielle Smith and Energy Minister Brian Jean last spring (Photo: Alberta Newsroom/Flickr).

Is it just me, or are other Albertans unnerved by how soon it was after Alberta Premier Danielle Smith was publicly musing about how hard it is for the United Conservative Party to get its paws on our Canada Pension Plan funds that her energy minister was ruminating in public about how Alberta’s highly profitable oil industry is going to need our help to clean up the messes it’s made?

Alberta is dotted with abandoned oil and gas wells (Photo: C.G. Engineering/cgeng.ca).

Is there a line between those dots? 

At the end of last week, Premier Smith suggested that, as The Canadian Press put it, “if Ottawa comes back this fall with a lowball estimate on Alberta’s share of the Canada Pension Plan, hard questions will have to be asked about the next steps.”

What next steps? a reasonable person would ask. Albertans have been making it abundantly clear in survey after survey, letter after letter, and social media post after social media post, that they want the UCP Government to keep its grubby hands off the CPP. The premier understands this. 

You can read her comment as a threat, I suppose, or as an effort, better late than never, to manage the expectations of the UCP’s MAGAfied base whose members have been persuaded that Alberta can be turned into an oil industry Valhalla by dipping into the 53 per cent of the CPP fund that Alberta preposterously argues it should be given if it pulls out of the plan. 

Yep, if Ottawa comes back with a more believable number, Ms. Smith complained, “we wouldn’t be able to reduce your premiums, and we wouldn’t be able to increase your benefits.”

For comparative purposes, Mr. Jean a couple of weeks ago – what the heck’s going on here? (Photo: Alberta Newsroom/Flickr).

She then asked, almost poetically: “Is the juice worth the squeeze?”

Meanwhile, yesterday, Energy Minister Brian Jean – who really ought to be known as the oil and gas minister, given the UCP’s well-known attitudes about renewable energy – was doing some public musing of his own about how the O&G industry, the mighty engine of Canada’s economy, couldn’t really afford to pay its cleanup obligations or its taxes. 

Oil and gas companies operating in rural Alberta already owe the province’s towns and villages something in excess of $250 million in unpaid property taxes.

As another Canadian Press story put it, “Jean said industry might need help from public finances to live up to its legal obligations, as well as lower municipal tax burdens and a lighter regulatory approach.”

“We need to find new ways to do liability financing, and we need to change the approach on municipal taxes,” Mr. Jean said, adding, just as poetically as Ms. Smith, “I don’t like sticks. I like carrots.”

You’d almost think they’re using the same cliché-o-meter! Of course, this being Alberta politics, they probably are. 

Mr. Jean said he supports the principle of polluter pay. But he also thinks the polluter should be paid to pay for its polluting. And guess who’s going to get to pay! 

“It’s important to me to make certain industry is responsible for its own messes,” he told the CP. “To stimulate activities that are necessary to protect Albertans, we might have to do some investment,” he added, immediately contradicting himself. He’s thinking about how to do that.

I think we all know how this is going to end up. The UCP will never ask the oil industry to pay its financial cleanup obligations, which are estimated now to be something like $260 billion.

So Mr. Jean’s big idea could turn out to be even more expensive than last year’s outrageous R-Star scam proposal, the plan to give multi-billion-dollar oil and gas corporations a huge royalty holiday as an incentive to clean up messes they’re already legally obligated to pay to clean up. It already had the potential to be the largest daylight robbery in Canadian history!

One way or another, it sure looks like Alberta taxpayers are going to be told they have no choice but to fork over that staggering sum.

But wait, someone is bound to say sooner or later, there’s a painless way we can do this! A way to have our cake and eat it too, if you like.

Cast your mind back Ms. Smith’s plan to turn our pensions into a huge slush fund to “invest” in the oil and gas industry.

Let’s mix some metaphors: Is the juice worth the squeeze? Do you like carrots better than sticks? Well, just wait a little and the other shoe is bound to drop!

Join the Conversation

35 Comments

  1. It is becoming clearer that the UCP learned the wrong lessons from its too close for comfort reelection. Namely that they can get away with whatever kooky or bad ideas they want.

    In politics arrogance often comes before a fall. A party that stops listening to the public at large and gets hijacked by narrow interests eventually pays the price. Still some things are likely not to fly regardless of how much the UCP tries. And their trifecta of replacing the CPP with a provincial pension plan, replacing the RCMP with a provincial police force and dismantling public health care are likely to get a lot of public push back which they will ignore at their own peril.

    I don’t think foisting billions of oil well clean up costs onto the public will go over well either and without a juicy pension fund will be hard for them to cover these costs. That doesn’t mean they won’t try, but if Albertans are vigilant, they can be stopped.

      1. Lars: That’s true to a point, but the media didn’t hold the UCP’s feet to the fire for all their pricey shenanigans and their major missteps. Licia Corbella, Lorne Gunter and David Staples were propping Danielle Smith and the UCP right up. Postmedia aligns with them.

  2. It is all in as far as oil and gas goes with the UCP. These global warming deniers are ensuring that children have no future, save living on a planet that will become ever more unliveable. Conservatives now are collectively hell-bent on enslaving people or worse, other than their like-minded friends – you know Elon Musk is predicted to become the world’s first trillionaire by 2027. That is just fine and dandy for the wealthy, they cannot have enough and want everything. Ah well, so what? Too many people are resigned and conservatives know this, so they are forging ahead, with little or no opposition, with their world destruction. For conservatives it is party until the last drop and what a ride of wealth and power for them. The GOP is already calling the 2024 election rigged. Will war ensue? Meanwhile Albertans vote in tyranny and are proud and happy to do so – thumbing their noses at liberalism. Thatcher et al. are laughing from their graves. When Smith gets her hands, or David Parker, on the CPP, will she/he then go after the money people have in their ATB accounts? After all, the ATB is part of the Alberta government – I wouldn’t put it past them. And you know what? After the UCP have bankrupted Albertans, the people of this province would still vote for the UCP. It is that bad people, or if you are a UCP supporter, it is that great! No where to go in the world where it is safe from the current international fascist conservative movement, we the people are indeed shortly doomed. Earth is the insane asylum of the universe.

  3. When we had Peter Lougheed as our premier, oil companies were mandadated to cleanup after themselves, and instantly correct any damages they had caused. Don Getty even made sure that was taken care of. There were no excuses allowed. As soon as Ralph Klein came into power, he avoided that responsibility completely, and we are now on the hook (with a conservative estimate), to fix this problem, at a whopping price tag of $260 billion. To top this off, the UCP are giving $20 billion of our money to these oil companies to address this longstanding issue with the oil companies, who should be paying for their cleanup themselves. Now, the UCP wants to hand more of our money for this. It is so absurd.

    The provincial pension plan is something that Danielle Smith and the UCP don’t seem to take no for an answer. They are skewing and twisting numbers, being secretive and devious, and making claims that are contrary to reality, which is backed up by economic experts. We will end up getting a raw deal out of this, and it will be made worse if it is connected to the oil and gas industry, because we will be putting our pensions at risk with their floppy schemes, which the UCP are partaking in.

    Even federally, people better beware with Pierre Poilievre. What is he going to be saying about this provincial pension plan? He was in the CPC when so many Canadians suffered a devastating blow, after their life savings vanished in the income trust fiasco, which had a hefty cost of $35 billion. Never trust phony Conservatives and Reformers to look after your retirement.

  4. So, let’s interpret Jean’s and Smith’s claptrap: the UCP, in it’s great wisdom and foresight, wants to help the O&G industry in a financial way so they will clean up their polluted oil and gas well sites, which, by Albertan law, the very profitable O&G industry is obligated to do……..but doesn’t.
    And the UCP politicians want control of what they claim is the fair share of what Albertan and a huge number of out-of-province workers and their employers have contributed to the Canada Pension Plan in the workers’ names.
    These 2 politicians’ musings show they intend to put Albertans’ CPP funds, one way or other, to work cleaning up O&G’s mess and obligation.
    This clean up work is an expense, a cost, not an investment.
    In other words, Albertans, the UCP want to take your now safely invested CPP funds and piss them down the drain.
    Kiss your enjoyable retirement years goodbye. Instead of receiving $1,000+ a month from CPP, you will receive zero. DJF

  5. I hope rural Albertans realize how they’re being screwed by the party they put in power. Here’s some recent coverage:
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alta-municipalities-oilpatch-1.7301698

    The best analysis was probably this U of C Law Blog article in July:
    https://ablawg.ca/2024/07/09/the-problem-with-industry-control-of-the-owa-and-owa-control-of-oil-and-gas-insolvency/

    An Alberta Wilderness Association staffer also commented:
    https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/opinion-albertas-energy-regulator-prioritizes-industry-profits-over-taxpayers

    1. Robert: perhaps the pee-pull of Calgary might also do some introspection – connect the dolts, so to speak. The UCP do not believe in the market when it comes to the carbon tax and they do not believe in the rule of law when it comes to orphan well clean up. How stupid are the UCP? All they have to do on well clean up is wait for Ottawa to clean it up just as Ottawa is is doing with the Giant Mine in Yellowknife. Or just ignore the problem. Much of northern Saskatchewan has been contaminated with radioactive mine waste since the 1960s. Seriously, who cares if a few Alberta farmers and ranchers get their noses out of joint. They have brought it on themselves just like the pee-pull of Calgary. Since 2015 Alberta’s oil production has doubled and most of that comes from the tar sands.

  6. I don’t hear a deafening roar from Nenshi’s NDP.
    Maybe all the NDP’s previous deafening roars made me deaf.

    Or maybe the NDP is OK with the UCP’s shameless neoliberal corporate welfare schemes funnelling billions of public dollars to our “golden goose” industry.
    Wasn’t it Notley who suggested buying TMX?
    Alberta’s Pipeline Queen didn’t raise much of a fuss about Kenney’s reckless investment in Keystone XL either.

    “…Notley has changed her tune on the Texas-bound Keystone XL pipeline. Before coming into power, she told the Calgary Herald in 2015 that she saw Keystone XL as a job builder for Texas, not Alberta. But her government is very much behind the project now, as it faces a new delay ordered by a U.S. court. ‘We’ve always supported the Keystone XL,’ McCuaig-Boyd told reporters in Edmonton on Friday.”
    “Climate change, oilsands and the carbon tax are at the heart of Alberta’s 2019 battleground”(National Observer, 2018)
    https://www.nationalobserver.com/2018/11/12/analysis/climate-change-oilsands-and-carbon-tax-are-heart-albertas-2019-battleground

    “NDP Leader Rachel Notley, never one to back down from an opportunity to criticize Kenney, is not on the attack this time. That’s because she had been in the same boat when she was premier in 2018 and declared she’d be willing to buy the Trans Mountain pipeline to keep its expansion project alive.
    “NDP supports project
    “On Thursday, after listening to Kenney speak about the Keystone investment, Notley said bluntly yet tamely, ‘We support this project.’
    “Oh, she’s still pressing Kenney for more details on his estimate that the Keystone investment will mean $30 billion in extra revenue for the province. But as someone who once considered investing $2 billion in a pipeline project, Notley is not in a position to press particularly hard.
    “Albertans asked to have faith in province’s pipeline play” (CBC, 2020)
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-jason-kenney-keystone-pipeline-1.5519974

    1. While I agree with you, I want to point out that the UCP is the equivalent of “Bible” Bill. Back to the future in the 1930s! In 20 (fracking and mountain top mining) 24 ffs! Yes we need consensus to force adoption of polices that serve the common good. But believe me, your only choice in Alberta to move them into action is a strong signal! You know, like a second NDP majority? Maybe, just maybe.. if we elect enough good people, they will listen and do good things. What’s our alternative plan?

    2. In case anyone feared Nenshi had gone missing, he was reportedly sighted (sited?) at the Calgary Chamber of Commerce today:

      “Nenshi criticizes federal energy policy in first address to Calgary business community” (Calgary Herald, Sep 17, 2024)
      “In his first address to Calgary’s business community as Alberta NDP leader, Naheed Nenshi criticized several proposed federal energy and emissions-reduction policies while steering away from making firm policy commitments.
      “Nenshi said he’s been working with the energy industry on creating a submission to the federal government on Bill C-59, an anti-greenwashing provision that led oil and gas companies to scrub their websites, citing confusion over the advertising standards being applied.
      “Nenshi said the federal government is ‘fundamentally wrong in what they’re putting forward’ and the provision is ‘against freedom of speech and expression.'”
      https://calgaryherald.com/news/politics/naheed-nenshi-criticizes-federal-energy-policy-business-address

      The O&G industry has every right to greenwash its operations. A proud Canadian tradition. You betcha.

      Nothing like a vigorous opposition that aligns its policy with the ruling party’s.
      The NDP is MIAP — missing in action and policy.

        1. Well Pogo: the Ab NDP could have taken a leaf out of Dave Barrett’s BC NDP. They had the humility to ask “are we here for a good time or a long time?” They opted for a good time and put in public auto insurance, an agricultural land reserve, and many other public interest polices which the fascists are still afraid to remove. The arrogant and cowardly Ab NDP actually thought they would be in there for at least two or more terms. Pathetic!

          Pogo: The enemy is not “us” it is the so-called “reformers”, acting as agents for the oligarch class colonizing Alberta and looting the place.

          1. Now we’re talkin’! Retake our utilities! Polluters pay! Yah!
            Tell me who is likely to move to those policies? Well certainly not the UCP! If we elect an NDP party that can push in our direction? I’d take that in a heartbeat at this point!

          2. The Neoliberal Deception Project could have set up a framework to establish housing co-operatives across the province back in 2015, and left such a legacy after the interregnum. Nothing of the sort occurred.

  7. Greed and megalomania know no bounds. If a right-wing federal government wins the next election, they will work with our elected provincial officials to seize the assets of the Canada Pension Plan, divvy it up between their corporate masters, raise the retirement age, lower the working age for children, privatize health across the country, eliminate all social programs, privatize schools, etc. Keep ’em sick, stupid and poor, just like in the Dickens era. Cradle-to-grave servitude.

    Horrific things are coming. The window to shut down these plans is closing. Power is being seized and consolidated in the hands of autocrats who aspire to be dictators. Democracy? No more! We’re getting hints from some elected officials right now, if you’re paying attention. School lunch programs for children? No, let them go hungry! Affordable child care? No, let those babies fend for themselves!

    Am I the only one who thinks city councils are about to be appointed in Alberta, ushering in taxation without representation? Green Line…

  8. If it weren’t for bad government,
    You know, we wouldn’t have no government at all…

    -with apologies to Albert King

        1. Yah. It shows Albert playing finger style and Stevie playin’ a pick. Every guitar player should scope the finger style. Sure it hurts. But eventually you build callouses. There’s a lesson in that! One that all of us need to learn!

  9. the potentate is wrong again; albertans don’t need to elect more ndp types in order to get more socialism. with ever increasing handouts to the o&g sector, the ucp types are pretty good at ensuring the state maintains support for the fossils industry, and keeping socialism viable in the province.

  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebel_News It’s somewhat exhausting to need to expose the extreme right wing, but here we are. Since Gavin McInnes (Rebel “Media”, Proud “boys”) reared his ugly mug in South Carolina, I thought it appropriate to drop a link to the history and parties involved, in Ezra Levant’s toxic shyte hole, called “Rebel News”. Why you may ask? Because Dani’s affiliation to all of them is only one degree of separation, that’s why! Apologies to Kevin Bacon. Whoever unpacks Faith Goldy better wear PPE!

  11. Such a lovely headline photo! He looks like the south end of a Marmot headed north and she looks like a daily prayer fridge magnet! Kudos!

  12. As to what is up with Brian Jean … not sure … but he appears to have been separated at birth from erstwhile NFL mediocrity Ryan Fitzpatrick. Although ‘Fitz’, as we like to call him, has aged far better.

  13. Dear columnist: you’re such a tease! Putting up a couple of Brian Jean photos taken a few months apart, and then saying, ” …what the heck’s going on here?”. The camera angles are different, and in the 2nd image, BJ is sporting (perhaps) chubbier cheeks and a more wicked grin. Am I missing something?

    1. S-B: Maybe look again at the big one, although my main point was just how scruffy he looks in the second, which is a bit distorted because he was standing at the end of a line of people and the photographer was using a wide-angle lens. But he does have a twinkle in his eye. DJC

  14. Openly celebrating intellectual dishonesty, moral dishonesty, and double think masquerading as cleverness is a sickness of spirit that is beginning to envelop the entire society. Capitalism is dead and has for some time been replaced by the visible hand of state sponsored lemon socialism. The first point is therefore a logical consequence of the the second fact.

  15. Brian Jean had a strong dislike for Danielle Smith, because of what she did to the Wildrose party. Now, he is cozying up with her. It’s never been about anyone else but themselves, and it shows.

  16. I want to leave a hopeful song at the end of your posts. It’s rough out here. I know that. That’s why you all need to keep in mind those less fortunate. I hope this song can centre you in your obligation to them. *sighs* https://youtu.be/Y9KC7uhMY9s

  17. I suspect Smith and company expect PP to hand over 50% of CPP if he forms a majority government.
    No government money ought to be used to clean up the wells. They made the mess, they clean it up.
    Don’t know how Smith can expect to gain 50% of the CPP fund. That money is invested and we who are retired are receiving our pensions from that money. If 50% of the money were given to Alberta how would the feds pay pensions to the retired in the rest of the country.
    Just over 6 million Canadians collect CPP and that amounts to about $52 billion a year.
    My question is, if 50% of the fund went to Alberta how is the federal government going to pay us our CPP pensions and that includes people who are paid CPP Disability and their children. CPP also pays children of people who died. I suspect there would be a lot of law suits. Not many of the provinces would be happy either. If people who rely on CPP were not to receive it or at a very reduced rate, the provinces might have to pay those who rely just on CPP

    1. e.a.f.: I expect Mr. Poilievre to oppose Alberta leaving the CPP. This is not to say he wouldn’t destroy it if he could, only that the political repercussions from the other eight provinces, including those with Conservative premiers, would be too great. The UCP plan would hurt every CPP plan member and retiree in Canada, and might have very serious repercussions for those who worked in Alberta but retired to another province, or even maintained an address in another province (like, say, Nova Scotia or Newfoundland) while working in Alberta. DJC

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.