The Pathways Alliance, the coalition of the largest and most powerful companies operating in Alberta’s oilsands, pulled all content from its elaborate and colourful website yesterday in reaction to the modest anti-greenwashing provision included in federal Bill C-59.

According to the Wayback Machine, all was normal at PathwaysAlliance.ca in the wee hours yesterday morning. “Canada’s oil sands are on a path to reach net-zero emissions from operations,” its home page promised.
Sometime later in the day, however, the colourful photos of earnest researchers “studying, testing and advancing dozens of new technologies to reduce emissions” were replaced by a grimly minimalist statement fretting about the modest anti-greenwashing provision in the Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023.
The notice warns that, “As part of late changes to the omnibus Bill C-59, imminent amendments to the Competition Act will create significant uncertainty for Canadian companies that want to communicate publicly about the work they are doing to improve their environmental performance, including to address climate change.”
Accordingly, it continues: “With uncertainty on how the new law will be interpreted and applied, any clarity the Competition Bureau can provide through specific guidance may help direct our communications approach in the future. For now, we have removed content from our website, social media and other public communications.”
The statement concludes: “To be clear, Pathways Alliance remains committed to the work we are doing. We believe our industry has a key role to play in reducing environmental impacts of oil sands production including helping Canada reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, while also supporting a vibrant economy and providing Canadians with secure access to affordable energy.”

Then the whole thing is repeated, encore une fois, en français.
It should be noted that the Competition Bureau has already committed to providing what the Pathways Alliance requests.
It is not clear, however, if the Pathways Alliance is going to be able to pull all those pretty blue buses, trolleys and streetcars bearing the message “Our net-zero plan is in motion” from the streets of several Canadian cities.
It would be interesting to see what transit companies have to say about that, seeing as their supply of vehicles may be limited, although I’ll leave that question to corporate media to answer.
Regardless, the changes to PathwaysAlliance.ca seem either overwrought or highly performative, you be the judge.

Or perhaps, as some observers of this saga commented on social media last night, it’s a tell.
Regardless, as previously noted in this space, even without clarity from the Competition Bureau, it seems likely that all companies have to do to avoid fines or, God forbid, jail sentences for the occupants of their C-suites under the environmental truth-in-advertising provision, is to promptly obey any orders from the same agency to remove questionable statements.
There is certainly no urgency to do anything immediately as the bill has not yet passed Parliament and become the law of the land.
Nevertheless, it would be reasonable to suppose that this is as good a way as any to ratchet up concern the greenwashing provision in C-59 is a “gag order,” as Alberta Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz falsely put it in an official Government of Alberta statement last month, or a violation of corporations’ free speech rights.
Ms. Schulz’s statement also misleadingly conflated NDP Charlie Angus’s private member’s bill, which will die on the Order paper, and the new greenwashing provision added as an amendment to the Competition Act.
Conservative Pierre Poilievre, should he become prime minister as seems likely, is sure to repeal even that modest measure, which would require corporations making claims about the environmental benefits of their products or processes, to back them up with some evidence.
As regular readers of this blog will be aware, the Pathways Alliance website is not the only victim if the unexpectedly impactful 54-word amendment to the Competition Act.
Already it has led to the demise of the notorious Albert Energy War Room and resulted in the War Room’s CEO being handed his walking papers.

I wonder if similar rules exist for auto industry advertising? That would make more sense if you want truth in advertising about stuff that people buy (I don’t know too many people who buy bitumen by the barrel).
Ahhh, but dilbit!—by the millions of barrels!!
I believe ol’ Billy had an opinion about liars that applies:
Macbeth Act 4 Scene 2
Son: And must they all be hanged that swear and lie?
Lady Macduff: Every one.
Son: Who must hang them?
Lady Macduff: Why, the honest men.
Son: Then the liars and swearers are fools,
for there are liars and swearers enough to beat
the honest men and hang up them.
…
God help us, “poor monkeys”! There doesn’t seem to be enough of the honest to take the liars to task.
Why does Alberta’s oil and gas sector keep getting slapped on the wrist? It’s become the perennial whipping boy for the various caped carbon crusaders. Meanwhile the Toronto-based Canada Pension Plan Investment Board who have been doubling down on fossil fuel investment, most recently celebrating Earth Day with an announcement they poured $300 million U.S. into the fracking fields in Ohio.
https://www.shiftaction.ca/news/2024/04/23/cppib-marks-earth-day-with-fracking-expansion
It’s merely one of many such announcements.
https://www.nationalobserver.com/2023/06/26/news/investors-canada-pension-plan-double-down-oil
Turns out the they’re big fans of Alberta oil and gas.
https://www.corporateknights.com/category-finance/canada-pension-plan-alberta-oil-gas/
Why can’t both things be bad ? You wouldn’t have an ideological axe to grind would you?
I’m not going to comment on the CPP investments, but here’s a thought as to why ‘truth in advertising’ is so important on the topic of oil. Saskatchewan has been boasting about their success at bringing their emissions down over the past few years. However, in 2023, a study was done where the emissions were actually measured instead of being estimated as Saskatchewan (?) was doing, and they found that emissions were actually 40% higher than what they were bragging about. And closer to home, it’s even worse when you consider Alberta tar sands operations where again, they ESTIMATE their emissions but actually measuring them, shows that the reality is 60% higher than the industry’s propaganda.
Truth in advertising should include what those oil companies are foisting on the public. And that is a good reason why the oil and gas companies deserve far more than a slap on the wrist. They are lying to us all.
Debrah: As I read the act, advertisers have to provide evidence for their claims, but not ironclad proof. DJC
Ronmac: $300 million sounds like a lot, but it is chump change for the CPP. The CPP’s 2022 Annual Report indicates they have net assets of $539 Billion with a net return of almost seven percent (6.8%).
The same audited statement also notes that the CPP has “$67 billion in green and transition assets” which they expect to double by 2030.
So, like any prudent investor, they have diversified their investments and their exposure to fossil dangers is not large.
Next will come announcements that they are laying off a few hundred web developers and comm’s people because of Trudeau’s war on creative advertisement.
The environment isn’t something that the UCP are even remotely concerned about. It’s how much money they can hand over to their oil, gas, and coal corporate overlords, while Albertans suffer.
The oil industry is unable to prove any claims they make? Interesting.
The oil companies are actively lying to us all. Of course they can’t prove lies.
“Pathways Alliance remains committed to the work we are doing.”
Ain’t that the whole truth!
Truth in advertising is an idea that comes up from time to time. Almost a bit revolutionary in my opinion, but usually in response to some business that has gone overboard.
However those advertising types are both very creative and clever and I feel will soon come up with new ways to still put out a positive message about their client businesses or industry in a less overt way if required.
So I am not too worried about the state of the advertising or energy industry here. I wonder if what happened with this website may be more to make a point and challenge the law rather than out of caution. It may be the corporate version of marching with duct tape over your mouth to get attention and sympathy.
SE, essentially, PathwaysAlliance’s actions are an admission that they were lying? Sounds like premature panic. They could have just discretely sanitized the website before the bill got royal assent.
Imagine that
Who would have thought
Ronmac points out a disturbing reality regarding Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s soaring support for the energy sector.
I guess that makes just about all of us complicit in the weak efforts to reach net zero emissions.
Concerns about Bill C-59 seem quite quaint in the context of where we’re all headed with climate change.
It is a bitch when you have to back up your statements with actual proof.
The daily bane of so many politicians and corporate folks whose stock in trade is half truths and in completely false statements.
Meanwhile, in Toronto, Ezra Levant is doing his own brand of advertising.
Is there a ‘truth in anything that comes out of Trudeau’s mouth’ bill coming down the PIPELINE anytime soon?
Loran– like Rebel news version of creative development on trucks??
And don’t blame PMJT on wanting truth in advertising ; every responsible person should want it—I’m guessing you’re okay with being lied to?