A Court of King’s Bench judge ruled yesterday that the Kenney Government’s decision to dump the requirement for kids to wear masks in school during the pandemic last February was politically driven in contravention of Public Health Act. 

Justice Grant Dunlop of the Alberta Court of King’s Bench (Photo: Canadian Underwriter).

Justice Grant Dunlop’s declaration that the United Conservative Party Government’s order lifting the masking requirement was “based on an unreasonable interpretation of the Public Health Act” is a useful reminder of the sins of now-demoted premier Jason Kenney. 

Albertans by and large have been so appalled by the unbearable weirdness of being governed by an anti-vaccine dark web conspiracy theorist like Danielle Smith that it’s already easy to forget just how bad a premier Mr. Kenney was. 

It’s not as if we didn’t all know that the man who brought us the Best Summer Ever ™ put politics ahead of public health, or that the ridiculous policy of letting schoolchildren go maskless while a tidal wave of COVID-19 infections battered the health care system was driven by the contra-experts in the Kenney cabinet and their desire to make COVID go away by pretending it already had.

Still, it’s comforting to have the imprimatur of a superior court judge on this reality, as obvious as it is. 

Justice Dunlop mostly agreed with the families of five immunocompromised children who sought the judicial review of the Feb. 8 order to lift the mask mandate and issued a declaration “for the benefit of the chief medical officer of health and other medical officers of health in considering future public health orders.”

Chief Medical Officer of Health Deena Hinshaw (Photo: Alberta Newsroom/Flickr).

The applicants, who also included the Alberta Federation of Labour, argued Chief Medical Officer of Health Deena Hinshaw abdicated her authority to the cabinet and thus failed in her obligation to protect vulnerable students.

Now, of course, we are governed by an unelected premier appointed by the UCP party base, well represented by many of the same MLAs in the United Conservative Party Caucus and Cabinet who led the charge to replace Mr. Kenney with Ms. Smith. 

This is not so comforting. Indeed, it’s downright disturbing. 

But like an airplane pilot of my acquaintance who as a passenger always stared avidly out the window of a plane so he’d be the first to know if anything went terribly wrong, at least we’ll have have the satisfaction of understanding what the problem was before we go splat! 

Justice Dunlop also agreed with the families and the AFL that Education Minister Adrianna LaGrange’s prohibition of school boards imposing their own mask mandates was not a legal order. 

Education Minister Adriana LaGrange speaking, as Dr. Hinshaw stands by (Photo: Alberta Newsroom/Flickr).

Instead, he wrote in his ruling, “While Minister LaGrange’s statement on its face appears to prohibit school boards from imposing mask mandates, it does not do so, because the minister can only do that through a regulation, and the statement was not a regulation.” (Emphasis added.) 

While Justice Dunlop didn’t go this far in his declaration, it’s hard for many of us to believe that Ms. LaGrange didn’t know this perfectly well when she issued her “order.” 

Whether or not that was the case, the judge’s declaration is useful because it puts the Smith Government on notice that the rule of law is still sort of a thing in Alberta, and its ministers really ought to consider its niceties when they do outrageous stuff in the weeks and months ahead. 

So we should all be grateful to the parents of the five children for making it possible for these matters to be clarified. One hopes it will have a positive effect on the conduct of Premier Smith and her enormous cabinet, although I sure readers will forgive me if I reserve judgment on how this is likely to play out.

Justice Dunlop did not rule that the children’s Charter rights were violated, however. 

The CBC report said AFL joined the case “because of the workplace health and safety issues of teachers.” I will admit I was somewhat mystified by this, as the teachers’ powerful union, the Alberta Teachers Association, is not an affiliate of the AFL. 

Join the Conversation

37 Comments

    1. I see Dr. Hinshaw as having willfully failed in her duties and having chosen her own perks and privileges over the lives of Albertans. When has a doctor exerted such little effort on behalf of their patients? How many people could contribute to so many needless, foreseeable, easily preventable deaths while retaining the title of “doctor?” Would absolutely love the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons to show they are aware of the problem and perhaps even inflict some sort of professional consequences upon Dr. Hinshaw.

      As an aside, there is no Hippocratic Oath in Canada. I know this because I reported her to the aforementioned college for violating it and was told it’s not a thing.

  1. We will have to brace ourselves, because the Covid-19 pandemic in Alberta isn’t over, and it’s getting worse. With Danielle Smith in power now, it’s going to get a lot worse. Dumping Dr. Deena Hinshaw and using AHS as a scapegoat for the UCP’s botch job of looking after the Covid-19 pandemic, isn’t going to cut it. Having case numbers that were unprecedented in Canada quite frequently, and even in the entire continent, should have been a lesson to the UCP. They didn’t learn. Alas, Danielle Smith is stubborn, and still refuses to learn. The train is accelerating faster and faster, and there is a cliff up ahead, and the brakes on the train are broken. Unfortunately, Danielle Smith can’t do anything about it. She can try to push different buttons, pull different levers, yell, and this will be meaningless, because the train she driving is going to crash.

    1. Albertans are not alone. Commiserations from Fordland courtesy of cp24.com
      – 121 deaths added to the COVID-19 total over last week, the highest number of deaths reported over a one week period since the spring
      – Ministry of Health added 109 fatalities to its COVID-19 death toll last week
      – The number of people testing positive rose more than 15% week-over-week and stands at 1,921

  2. Well it’s pretty hard to do the job you’re supposed to do when you can be fired for doing just that. The anti vax crowd in America were calling for Dr. Fauci to be executed at one point. I lay most of the blame right at the feet of Trump. The great divider refused to get on board with the science and politicized the simple act of wearing a mask. The rest of the right wing ( politicians,commentators,nut jobs) got the green light from Trump’s outright refusal to back the science and have never looked back.
    What’s going on with the ” War Room”? Smith is wading into the Flames Arena deal and other places she doesn’t belong ,I just thought there would be an announcement on JK’s pet project. Wasn’t there a 30 mil price tag ( under the table ) for the war room budget?

    1. Ayeamaye: It’s not clear what Danielle Smith will do with the War Room. I expect she’ll keep it though. Her only problem with Kenney seems to be that he wasn’t aggressive enough attacking the “enemies of Alberta” – a category that includes about half of us Albertans. Plus, the WR is a useful money laundering scheme to turn public dollars into partisan UCP dollars. The only news I can tell you is that the WR appears to have a policy of changing its directors every time there’s a change in the holder of the Justice, Energy or Environment portfolios. So Whitney Issik, added after Doug Schweitzer quit, will now have to be removed and Peter Guthrie added. Tyler Shandro was added to the board in the last shuffle, so her gets to stay, as does Sonya Savage, even though she changed ministries. Jason Nixon is out. But then, he’s really out. This is news, by the way, but not news worth reporting. I believe no one has ever reported that the WR board was shuffled whenever the cabinet is shuffled. DJC

    2. Indeed. While many will hail this decision as a victory for the rule of law, I don’t really see how it will make any difference in the greater scheme of things. So, the CMOH is independent of the Minister in issuing or lifting public health orders. So what? That officer serves at the pleasure of the Minister — not even the Lieutenant Governor in Council — and so if s/he issues a public health order the Minister doesn’t like, refuses to issue one the Minister want her/him to issue, or refused to lift an existing one, s/he can be fired and a more compliant CMOH hired.

      All this decision does is add in a couple of additional steps the Government needs to execute before getting what it wants. The CMOH still isn’t a truly independent decision-maker, like the Auditor-General or a judge is.

  3. “The applicants, who also included the Alberta Federation of Labour, argued Chief Medical Officer of Health Deena Hinshaw abdicated her authority to the cabinet and thus failed in her obligation to protect vulnerable students.”

    This phrase caught my eye, because I wondered if it would give Danielle Smith’s government cause to dismiss Dr. Hinshaw (which brings to mind the man who murdered his parents begging for clemency because he is an orphan), then I realized it was only the applicants’ point, and not the judgement. I found the judgement on line (linked below), and it does not appear that the judge included Dr. Hinshaw’s alleged authority abdication in his judgement, but I definitely did not read the entire 28 page judgement.

    On the charter rights front, it appears that the reason the judge did not find that the students’ charter rights were violated was because the lawyers for the parents did not call the children’s doctors to testify, so the parents’ claim that their children were immunocompromised was deemed hearsay, and not admitted.

    I was also struck by how much research (ie expense) the government lawyers put into their argument.

    In the judgement, Justice Dunlop also quotes from the Public Health Act, which creates the position of the Chief Medical Officer of Health. As I read that portion, I was again reminded of Danielle Smith’s promise to fire Dr. Hinshaw. Removing Dr. Hinshaw would be step 1, but step 2 would be to either find a replacement for her or repeal/amend the act that creates the position.

    According to Justice Dunlop, the Act outlines the qualifications the CMOH is required to have. I can’t imagine how difficult it would be to find someone with the required qualifications who would also be willing to adopt the UCP view of public health, especially since, as Tyler Shandro is learning, their actions could easily be subject to review by their professional body.

    https://www.albertacourts.ca/docs/default-source/qb/judgments/cm-v-alberta-2022-abkb-716—decision.pdf?sfvrsn=38b46182_5

    1. Hey, hey, it’s Saturday!

      https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-government-to-try-to-prohibit-covid-19-mask-mandates-in-schools-smith-says-1.6634314

      I’m not sure what “full authority” means in Smith-speak. It sure sounds similar to “authoritarian”.

      In any case, the UCP minions of mega-Smith seem determined to repeat past mistakes and worse. This could be a step in the direction of repealing the Public Health Act. I wonder if such a thing has ever been done by an unelected Canadian premier. What else awaits us if she gets away with such a thing?

  4. DC, Great column. Question, are you leaving Twitter? I looked for you on CounterSocial, but you don’t seem to be there. Any other non-Twitter suggestions?

    1. Thanks, Simon. I really have no idea what I’m going to do. Facebook is useless – just an advertising platform that barely spreads the message I’ve published a new post unless I pay them money. Twitter is a sewer, and now it’s a sewer owned by a racist Bond villain. CounterSocial? Seems weird, and sketchy. Sounds like it’s run by a Batman comic-book villain. So my answer is the same as Zhou Enlai’s when Henry Kissinger asked him what he made of the French revolution: “Too soon to tell.” DJC

      1. Discord may be an option, although I have been permanently banned for some reason. There is also the option of running your own service like Matrix. Matrix is discord-like and allows easy federation to other servers (user bases) but you control your own server, the content and who has access. https://matrix.org/discover/

        1. Matrix and Mastodon are two fantastic technologies but there isn’t really one thing that exists in the freedom promoting F/OSS software sphere that would work for the non-techies like Mr. Climenhaga.

  5. Crossing over the nonsense of the Kenney Era, Alberta has stepped into the dementia of the Smith Era. While Kenney was so involved in the political expediency of the public health orders, to the point of paying a extraordinarily handsome bonus to Hinshaw, it should come as no surprise what was reviewed about the government’s actions. But stepping into Danielle Straitjacket’s universe of alternative facts, bogus science, and looney quackery, whatever Kenney did will seem reasonable by comparison.

    Btw, Alberta broke over the 5,000 death count from COVID. I suspect Smith will move to challenge these numbers, because the AHS cannot be trusted, as they are in league with the globalists, who want everyone to adopt a diet of insects, and obey their lizard overlords.

    1. “Diet of insects” … biologically speaking, everyone who’s ever had lobster, crab, prawns or shrimp has eaten bugs. They’re all arthropods, just way bigger & meatier than insects or most spiders.

  6. My wife worked for the ATA for some 33 years and still helps with some projects. I was always proud of how they never allowed these phony conservatives , Reformers, kick them around and always tried to protect teachers, parents and students from these fools hellbent on destroying the system so they could privatize it. The recent rally and lawsuits prove they are still doing their jobs. I will never forget one of Danielle Smith’s Wildrose candidates in 2012 who told me she fully supported Smith’s plan to privatize our health care and education systems, if elected. She had a son in a private school and it was wonderful she said and it was only costing her $1,000. per month. I asked her if she would feel the same way if she had 6 children. She stated that no one should be allowed to have more than two kids. In the election she got 198 votes and the Conservative who beat her got more than 25,000 . That’s what people thought of her stupidity.
    It’s no secret that these Reform Party fools have brainwashed ignorant Albertans into believing that Unions are the enemy because they know they can’t beat them. I think Unions are heroes to a lot of employees and we would be in a hell of a mess without them. Of course if you treat your employees properly you should never need to use them. The Alberta Treasurer Branches never have.

  7. On one hand, I am not so sure how much this matters now. The bad man – Kenney, has now left. However, on the other hand it does remind us how badly things were bungled by Kenney and crew, who ironically are supposedly the moderate wing of the UCP.

    The judge’s ruling actually makes total sense. We do have a Chief Medical Officer, whose job as a medical professional was to make such decisions, because they should be based on medical information and knowledge, not politics.

    Perhaps this also leads to an interesting series of questions as to why this did not happen in this case such as was the government in a rush? Did they just not care? Did the Chief Medical Officer not agree with this decision? etc … Some have advocated for a public inquiry into how the UCP handled COVID, which could answer some of these questions.

    We can’t go back and fix what was done, but at least we can try better understand why it happened, learn from it and hopefully not repeat the same mistakes in the future.

  8. Off topic, but a real head-scratcher from https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sloly-emergencies-act-inquiry-testimony-1.6629975:

    ‘Despite receiving several early warnings, former Ottawa police chief Peter Sloly says that — even in “hindsight” — he doesn’t think the intelligence he was getting before the protest convoy rolled into town suggested that protesters would dig in and remain.

    “To this day, even with the benefit of hindsight, I do not have any clear impression or saw any clear conclusions that we were going to have anything more than what I was being briefed on by my team,” he said during his highly anticipated appearance before the Emergencies Act inquiry on Friday.’

    Even with the benefit of hindsight? That’s one heck of an outlandish claim. Enough to make me wonder if Mr. Sloly’s testimony carries with it the potential penalty of perjury (obviously I know Canadian courts would never actually enforce that upon any Police officer because the courts and police have cooperated in illegal and extralegal activities since well before Canada was a country).

    Nice to see Mr. Sloly coming out of retirement to give Canada’s collective Police forces another black eye. Just what they need. /s

    1. Neil: If we accept the principle of Occam’s razor, then the most logical explanation for the behaviour of the Ottawa Police Service is that they were in sympathy with the occupiers. I don’t believe that of (former) chief Sloly, by the way, although he strikes me as someone who was badly out of his depth. The screaming question that one would hope the Inquiry will attempt to answer is, If there were still legal options for removing the occupiers, as various police forces now insist, why didn’t they employ them? It is an unavoidable conclusion that until the Emergency was declared, almost literally nothing was done. (Every city has local criminals, and I was frankly surprised that Ottawa’s didn’t take it upon themselves to “encourage” the occupiers to leave. An example would have needed to be made of only one or two of the occupiers pour encourager les autres. I suspect that would have happened in Montreal or Toronto when the occupation began to interfere with criminal business.) To me, the Ottawa situation, which is bound to happen again if things are left as they are, requires the creation of a federal district in Ottawa and Hull policed by an agency that reports to the national government. DJC

      1. ” If there were still legal options for removing the occupiers, as various police forces now insist, why didn’t they employ them?”

        As far as I know, all the legal options involved some form of confrontation, which would have been really risky with an occupation of that size, especially considering the population density of the area and the fact that a significant weapons cache had been discovered at the Coutts blockade. As a result, blocking the transfer of funds to the protestors was a brilliant, non confrontational tactic. If it took the Emergency Measures Act to facilitate the fund blocking, so be it.

        1. Bob: I agree. My point, though, is that all three police forces – RCMP, OPP and OPS – are all now claiming there was no problem, they had the means to end the occupation. Well then, why didn’t they? Obviously, for the reasons you cite, it required the Emergencies Act to end it. This is painfully obvious. My fear is the Inquiry commissioner will feel an obligation to put some of the blame on the federal government just the same. DJC

      2. DJC, the same could be said of the Edmonton Police Service. At least one report appeared (in CBC, my usual source) of a “convoy” protest honking its way through the river valley. It was stopped by counter-protesters on foot.

        The Edmonton cops showed up, and told the counter-protesters to go home. No word on whether they warned off the yahoo trucker-wannabes.

        1. I was there, Mike. The cops told the counter-protesters not to block the road, not to go home – because, you know, motorized vehicles always have the right of way, even when they’re intentionally disrupting other traffic. The so-called truckers in their pickups still had to sit there for a long time. DJC

          1. Thanks for the clarification. You’re a braver man than I am–I prefer to read about such things the following day.

      3. Good point, Mr. Sloly has come across as more of a hapless stooge than a moustache-twirling villain to me as well.

    2. Neil, I seem to recall warnings on CBC, probably other MSM as well, that the “truckers’ convoy” had announced they intended to stay in Ottawa until the government was changed, and their own guys installed instead. In fact, the Governor General told them, and was REPORTED BY MSM telling them, “No, it doesn’t work that way.” That was before they reached Ottawa (I think).

      I’m not sure what to make of Sloly’s testimony. Didn’t anyone tell him “Sir, they said they’re staying”? What about the reports of crowd-funding? $10M raised to support the “occupation”? I don’t recall who said what, when–but I do recall nothing happened until the Emergencies Act was declared.

  9. “Instead, he wrote in his ruling, “While Minister LaGrange’s statement on its face appears to prohibit school boards from imposing mask mandates, it does not do so, because the minister can only do that through a regulation, and the statement was not a regulation.””

    As a point of law I am sure Justice Dunlop is correct, but it also has to be acknowledged that from an implementation perspective, the effect is the same. Schools, especially in rural areas, had a hard enough time enforcing the mask mandate; it would have been infinitely worse trying to explain to teenagers and parents that what the Education Minister said on TV does not count because it was a statement and not a regulation.

  10. “Indeed, it’s downright disturbing” Alberta is now governed by an unelected, “anti-vaccine dark web conspiracy theorist” thinly elected by the same UCP faction which compelled the recently-ousted premier to make as light of the Covid pandemic as he did— which of course overflowed the province’s hospitals with the afflicted (now including over 5,000 Albertans’ lives which the deadly virus claimed). But it is indeed a comfort, small as it is in prospect of the so-far bumbling caretaker-leader of the UCP’s disastrous rookie mandate, that the rule of law has been exercised by school kids’ parents and that the Court of King’s Bench Justice Dunlop issued a declaration which would probably be a better comfort to them if the new UCP administration were to ever heed it. There’s fair reason to have doubts, though.

    It reminds me of two seaplane flights I took to Vancouver and back to the the Big Island a couple of weeks ago. Unlike DJC’s airline pilot acquaintance whose flights as a passenger consist of keenly trained vigilance of the craft’s air-worthiness so’s to be the first one to know if something goes wrong before going “splat!” —I’m more inclined to simply trust that we’ll takeoff and touchdown safely. I’m actually quite familiar with seaplanes, having spent decades flying in and out of logging camps on the bays and fiords of BC’s Central Coast. But I’m no pilot (or much at home on the water where I invest as much trust in the sea captain in heavy seas as I do a bush pilot in inclement weather). Still, I never worry that all the systems and expertise are checked and tested and rechecked and retested and re-rechecked and re-retested and…(my mantra— if I’m not asleep in my swaying bunk or sprawled and snoozing on the luggage in the plane’s cargo bay).

    But it’s incredible to imagine politicians ever ignoring public safety standards with respect air-flight or seafaring—or, for that matter, food, medicine, any number of consumer products, and rules of the road. Because I trust they’re there, I’m usually oblivious—but, then again, I don’t live in the great province of Alberta anymore.

    It might have been too frightful flying in that De Havilland Turbo-Otter if the US National Transport Safety Board and Federal Aviation Regulator hadn’t issued an urgent bulletin regarding the condition of a certain lock-ring on the pitch-control actuator-jackscrew doo-hicky a week before our scheduled flights: we flew in the same model as the DHCT-3 that crashed into the chilly waters of Mutiny Bay near Whidbey Island, Washington, on September 4th, killing all ten people aboard. I could never imagine a Canadian government, aviation authorities and Vancouver’s Harbour Air company not heeding the warning to urgently check this vital part simply because the Mutiny Bay investigation was conducted by a different authority in a different jurisdiction—or because that kind of news might negatively impact the tourism industry or scare away customers. Thus I flew with complete confidence that the public safety systems of two different nations were checked, tested, and the suspect part checked and tested, rechecked, retested, re-rechecked and…(no need to recite the complete mantra)…and every single Otter in service has been likewise checked and rechecked. (The Otter is a damn fine craft I’ve flown in many times.)

    Arguably the bio-political aspects of virology and public safety are exceedingly complex but, like aviation, otherwise involve standard protocols developed and carefully executed by many experts—from ambulance personnel to hospital staff and on to science laboratories developing vaccines for authorized distribution, all coordinated by numerous safety redundancies, public health regulations, medical professionals and other public health authorities —and of course, by citizens themselves. Now, admittedly Covid caught many jurisdictions somewhat flat-footed, but without the pre-existence of all these public health systems and dedicated expertise turned toward the pandemic we never could have endured it like we did.

    There was never any other workable policy but to impose epidemiological restrictions to stem the spread of contagion and to develop effective vaccines in addition to specific respiratory treatments already at hand. The only real impediment was politics —that is, the politics of getting this policy done. Most Canadian jurisdictions initially struggled to come up to speed, but few actually went backwards like in the USA where over one million citizens have died of Covid. But K-Boy’s “Best Summer Ever” proved to be one: essentially he went the wrong way on a one way street.

    It’s been decades since the only way labour unions could get job safety issues fixed was to drop tools and walk out. Over the years many safety measures first addressed by workers and employers made their way into systems of public health. Consumer advocates got industry and government to develop safety standards which protect everyone, not only workers and customers. Yes, there were a “freedom” complaints about seat belt mandates—and lawn darts too—nevertheless, the greater good has been the business of public authority since the modern age began. But it’s been centuries since public authority didn’t worry about epidemics—if only because the literate well-to-do, parliamentarians like Samuel Pepys and popes like Clement VI, realized they were as vulnerable as the vulgar poor. Indeed, the 14th century Pope granted remission of sins to anyone who died of bubonic plague—a considerable comfort to the superstitiously religious. Good thing we’ve come a long way since then. Or, as one might say in Alberta, “hopefully…”

    Unfortunately for Alberta, voters elected a party and leader who “politicized” the pandemic—that is, the UCP pursued the politics of partisan ideology instead of that of getting that recommended epidemiological policy done. Moreover, the UCP turned Covid into ultra-toxic partisanship in order to incorporate it with its goofy policy of blaming partisan rivals for problems of its own making, of casting Albertans as victims instead of beneficiaries of measures intended to help them, and of attacking medical professionals, nurses and school teachers during a most trying time. Yet it’s fair strange that on the one hand the UCP could be thanked for getting rid of Kenney but, on the other, that its anti-vaxxer faction replaced him with the afore-mentioned “anti-vaccine dark web conspiracy theorist,” Danielle Smith. It’s like cutting off the nose to spite the face while driving full speed the wrong way on a one way street. I guess it’s a comfort that over 90% of Albertans didn’t really vote for this—not yet, anyways.

    Justice Dunlop’s judicial review is a only mixed blessing: while it confirms the validity of public health standards and the public’s access to the courts, it took eight and two-thirds months to complete. That’s longer ‘n’ Smith has left in her janitorial mandate. It probably means that whatever goofy policies she might try to impose on Albertans can’t be challenged in court in a timely fashion (personally, I think that’s probably her modus operandi: Damn the torpedoes and the risk of being hoisted upon her own petard—so long’s it also explodes Alberta’s relationship with our federation). Several months is a long time in pandemic terms, and most of Smith’s Constitution-challenging horizon coincides with the typically challenging winter months when Covid and flus and inflation and recession and Holiday-Seasonal credit card hangovers are at their worst. While she’s busy not being interested in anything public health experts have to say, she’ll probably blame Ottawa for all of those things—including winter. And while good citizens with real concerns about their government not obeying the law—or even the rule of it—might contemplate resort to the courts, Smith will be contemplating her own.

    I never thought I’d have to say it, but looks like my Alberta compatriots will have to look out for themselves again this Covid season—now, with K-Boy safely gone, more than ever.

    Please, my friends, be careful out there.

  11. Remember when Deena Hinshaw was not only respected, but almost idolized? In March and April 2020, she was the voice of calm reason and reassurance. People were saying, “What would Deena do?” Even Kenney and his fellow yahoos followed Dr. Hinshaw’s instructions.

    So what happened? I still think the problem was, we got out of the first wave so easily—hospitals weren’t overwhelmed, people weren’t dying of plague in the streets—that Kenney & the Klowns said, “Is that it? That was EASY!” They began ignoring Hinshaw’s advice. Their fear turned to anger, their arrogance resurfaced, and we all paid for their refusal to believe it wasn’t over.

    I can only assume Dr. Hinshaw was the victim of a political pile-on that wore down her will to talk sense into the ignorant politicians. She eventually gave up and (ironically) was treated as “one of us”—maybe this explains the quarter-million dollar bonus.

    We can only wait to see how the Smith Goon Squad will treat Hinshaw. A big enough “leave now” bonus might keep her quiet. If she’s told “You’re fired. Get out” without a severance package, that might trigger a wrongful dismissal lawsuit. I dunno, this mess is so tangled I don’t know what to think now. The only thing I’m sure of is that Albertans will suffer for UCP ignorance…again.

  12. And so, the inevitable backlash begins. Danielle Smith, the Queen of Qberta, has announced she will try to stop schools from making kids wear face masks:
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-government-to-try-to-prohibit-covid-19-mask-mandates-in-schools-smith-says-1.6634314

    It’s for the kids’ health, of course. The poor dears must be stressed out, wearing those horrible masks. And just to make sure it never happens again:
    “Smith has also instructed Shandro, Health Minister Jason Copping and Education Minister Adriana LaGrange to alert her of any legislative or regulatory changes that would be required to ‘reaffirm or clarify our government’s full authority’ on health and education matters, she said.”

    I’m beginning to seriously wonder if Danielle Smith’s father was some kind of petty tyrant who never let his kids do anything without permission. Could that explain Smith’s knee-jerk refusal to accept ANY authority that tries to tell her “no”?

    1. I’ve long had an inexpert theory that many of the convoy goers still deeply resent being toilet trained and they manifested this by committing all sorts of nuisances on the public streets of Ottawa. Maybe that also applies to Smith.

  13. For historical (or hysterical) interest, here’s a little background info on Covid-19 in Alberta.

    It’s now 31 months (give or take a couple weeks) since the Covid-19 crisis began. 5,011 Covid deaths in Alberta means the average monthly rate is 161 deaths per month.

    It’s worth noting that, in 2020-21, there were NO reported cases of influenza in Alberta. None. Zero. No hospitalizations. No ICU admissions. No deaths. Not one single laboratory-confirmed case of the flu. Why? Well, maybe ‘cause everybody was so Covidized we just missed ‘em. Or maybe the public-health measures against Covid-19 were even more effective against influenza. I dunno, you decide.

    AHS used to have a table showing deaths from influenza for the previous five years. It’s gone now (weird, right?), so you have to dig for annual reports instead. Here’s a link:
    https://open.alberta.ca/publications/2561-3154

    The 2017-18 report includes a summary table (page 11, Table 3) of hospitalization, ICU admissions and deaths from flu, in the years from 2013-14 to 2017-2018. In those five years:
    • 94 deaths in 2014-15, and 84 in 2017-18 are the highest counts. The total of the five years is 317.
    • Death rates per 100,000 population were between 0.8 (2013-14) and 2.3 (2015-16).
    • For the nit-pickers, section 5 states that for 2017-18, “There were 92 deaths among hospitalized cases with laboratory-confirmed influenza, of which 84 deaths were directly related to influenza.” So only the cases where influenza was the cause of death are counted.

    Note that the MONTHLY average death rate from Covid-19 is twice the ANNUAL total from influenza’s worst two recent years.

    Now the Covid-deniers have control of the Oilberduh guv’mint, and they’re gonna teach AHS a lesson. This when Omicron, the most transmissible variant yet, is spreading fast–again. Omicron sub-variants are now able to evade the immune response, from both vaccination and prior infection. The sheer number of cases will inevitably cause more deaths.

    Does anyone still claim Covid-19 is no worse than the flu? Let the special pleading and personal attacks begin….

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.