MP Wai Young’s lines were flubbed, but nevertheless they sound like a cynical Harper Government talking point

Posted on July 16, 2015, 1:37 am
10 mins

PHOTOS: The Cone of Silence – it just doesn’t work for anyone any more. Below: Conservative MP Wai Young, Conservative PM Stephen Harper and Jesus, whose position on Canadian politics is unknown.

It seems likely Vancouver South MP Wai Young fumbled a cynical Harper Government talking point when she claimed last month that Air India Flight 182 and the 329 innocent people aboard would have been saved in 1985 if only Bill C-51 had been in effect.

This possibility seems to have been ignored amid the general hilarity prompted by revelation of a digital recording of Ms. Young’s remarks to the Harvest City Church in Vancouver, in which she could clearly be heard arguing that Jesus would have approved of the unconstitutional bill the Conservatives claim is designed to prevent terrorism in Canada.

WaiYoungThe recording, made with almost supernatural clarity, was given to the Broadbent Institute’s Press Progress online publication, which published it on Tuesday. Press Progress is quickly becoming Canada’s go-to site for the republication of such unauthorized recordings.

“Jesus served, he saved, but he acted, as well,” Ms. Young can be heard explaining in the recording. You know, just as Prime Minister Stephen Harper acted when he cooked up C-51 as an exercise in wedge politics to activate the Conservative Party of Canada’s base and put the opposition between a rock and a hard place, a strategy that in the event worked only with the third-party Liberals rather to the advantage of the Opposition NDP.

Ms. Young’s bizarre theologizing sparked a day of Harper Government opponents Tweeting scriptural references twisted to parody the Conservative Party of Canada’s (market) fundamentalist dogma using the hashtag #CPCJesus, a development that was greeted rapturously by the media.

This was highly entertaining, but it tended to obscure some of the more serious issues underlying the debate about the so-called Anti-Terrorism Act, 2015, to which Ms. Young was trying to contribute.

Commenters on social media focused on such questions as whether, if he were to return any time soon, Jesus would be deported under Bill C-51 for being a religious troublemaker from the Middle East.

SeriousSteveIn the recording, Ms. Young tells Harvest City parishioners that “if Bill C-51 had been in place 30 years ago, Air India would never have happened. Those some 400 lives would have been saved.”

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service, she stated, “knew, or heard, that there was a bomb on board this plane, but because of the strict laws that government departments have they cannot share information between departments. … Because they couldn’t share that information with the RCMP, the RCMP could not act to take that bomb off that plane.”

Needless to say, if that explanation had any truth to it, it would be a national story and a major scandal for CSIS and any other law enforcement or security agencies involved.

So yesterday, in the wake of the recording’s publication, Ms. Young quickly recanted, saying she “misspoke” when she made that particular comment. Presumably, however, she stood by her interpretations of Christian doctrine.

But while Ms. Young presumably fumbled her delivery of the claim something like Bill C-51 could have prevented the Air India disaster 30 years ago, the basic idea seems not very far removed from one of the key talking points that emerged earlier this week in the Senate’s interim report on preventing terrorism.

The Conservative Senators on the Upper Chamber’s Standing Committee on National Security and Defence who produced the interim report relied very heavily on the deadly Air India attack to justify questionable conclusions about jihadi terrorism – even though the 1985 disaster stemmed from a fight over political separatism between the government of India and a group of radical followers of the Sikh religion.

62101_000_Christ.qxdArguably, the purpose of the poorly researched, often illogical and seemingly hurriedly written Senate report had more to do with arousing fears of terrorism to strengthen the Harper Government’s waning electoral position than to actually guard against the real threat of terrorism at home and abroad.

This seems especially likely since there’s an expert consensus developing that recommendations and omissions alike in the report – for example, its strange lack of emphasis on community outreach to young people vulnerable to extremist recruitment – would actually make terror attacks in Canada more likely.

Faced with the reality there have not been very many examples of jihadi terrorism in Canada – and those few may in fact have been the work of mentally ill individuals acting on their own – the Senators turned to a case of genuine terrorism 30 years ago, reasonably confident in the assumption many Conservative supporters wouldn’t know or care about the differences between religions not part of their own experience.

Ms. Young’s sermonizing sounds like it had its start in the same playbook, and only went awry when she flubbed her lines.

Even then, all would likely have been well for the Harper Conservatives were it not for the small miracle of effective digital recording devices packaged in tiny telephones carried everywhere by almost everyone, which gave rise to the #CPCJesus meme:

#CPCJesus broke the bread, gave it to his disciples and said ‘this is my tax break, given for you, so that scandal may be forgiven’,” Tweeted one wag. “Judge not, lest you declare all of our legislation unconstitutional,” Twittered another among the scores of twisted scriptures mocking the Conservatives’ policy eschatology.

“Blessed are the meek, for they shall be redirected to a polling station somewhere in Guelph,” said yet another.

Interestingly, Ms. Young also told the congregation that she believes Mr. Harper’s party, just like Jesus, tries to “always do the right thing, not the most popular thing.” (Emphasis added.)

This may suggest that the End Times are nigh for the Conservatives, as the excuse that “showing courage,” doing the right thing and not merely doing what voters want is invariably the last cry of a government that’s on the way out because it’s stopped listening to its constituents. Who can forget Brian Mulroney making the same excuse just before he was decisively cast out of the garden?

If there is a universal takeaway from this, it’s that nowadays digital recording devices are always with us, and all politicians, regardless of their party, need to conduct themselves accordingly.

However, that a Conservative Party of Canada MP would back away from any statement, no matter how ill informed or preposterous, may in itself be a small miracle, perhaps the first that can be ascribed to #CPCJesus.

Thus endeth the lesson.

CORRECTION & CLARIFICATION: I had it wrong when I wrote that Wai Young’s speech to the Harvest City Church was leaked to Press Progress by someone with one of those ubiquitous digital recording devices. In fact, it turns out the church posted an audio recording to the Internet itself. Mea culpa. If I’d followed all of the story’s links I would have seen that. That said, it doesn’t really change my conclusions about the need for politicians to take care in the digital age, or my belief that Ms. Young tailored her remarks for an evangelical audience on the assumption that her words would be heard by no one else, or the fun we’ve all been having with #CPCJesus. Indeed, I might add the conclusion that if you’re going to post recordings of speakers at your events, you should ask the speaker’s permission. So I’m not going to try to hammer the story into a new shape at this late hour to pretend I always get everything right, which of course I don’t. I’ll leave that pretence to the mainstream media. DJC This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

15 Comments to: MP Wai Young’s lines were flubbed, but nevertheless they sound like a cynical Harper Government talking point

  1. TC

    July 16th, 2015

    Full disclosure: I live in Vancouver South, and I voted for her twice, in 2008 and 2011. I also had the opportunity to do some volunteer work in her constituency office, and have met her personally. In addition, as a dual citizen, I can be adversely affected by C-51. That being said, I support it in principle, even if I may disagree with how it may be enforced by the Government.

    As the slogan of a MSNBC pundit show (I won’t advertise it here) goes: You’re entitled to your opinion, but not your own facts. Being a constituent in her riding, I’m indifferent about who she compares Prime Minister Harper to. But given that she’s not in Cabinet, and doesn’t sit on any high-profile committees, I wish she spent more time trying to sell C-51 with factual information. It’s unfortunate that such a low-profile MP got attention for the wrong reason. She brought up the Air India bombing because Vancouver South has a large East Indian population.

    Unfortunately, it may be too late to find another Conservative candidate in Vancouver South. On a personal note, with new boundaries for ridings, I’ll be a constituent of Vancouver Granville, and will have the opportunity for voting for someone else.

    Reply
    • TRB

      July 16th, 2015

      Supporting fascist Republican puppets makes you a traitor.

      Reply
    • Bytowner

      July 17th, 2015

      She won’t divert from the talking points. Nor will any Conservative candidate that replaces her while Harper leads the party.

      Reply
  2. anonymous

    July 16th, 2015

    Thank God you included the wonder bread depiction of the Jesus with your post. The non-wonder bread depictions make me more nervous than a non-Christian appearing before a Harper Senate security committee hearing.

    Reply
    • David Climenhaga

      July 16th, 2015

      Rembrandt, I think. But, you’re right, I should try to do better, and in future will.

      Reply
  3. jerrymacgp

    July 16th, 2015

    Things are pretty bad when you need to be a theologian, or at least to have been raised in a Christian tradition with regular attendance not only in church but in Sunday school, to engage in political dialogue in this country. As an atheist, I find myself particularly befuddled by this whole discussion, since not only can we not know what Jesus would have thought of current Canadian political debates, but cannot be objectively sure he (or He, if you prefer) ever actually existed at all.

    As for Air India, it’s clear there is at least a subset of HarperCon MPs who are unable to distinguish different religious and cultural groups who have turban-like headgear in common. Sikhs wear turbans; so do many Muslims. But Islam and Sikhism are very different faiths, and originated in totally different parts of the world and at different times in history. It is ignorant to conflate them in this manner.

    Reply
    • David Climenhaga

      July 16th, 2015

      Jerry: It is indeed ignorant to conflate Sikhism and Islam, although I think many Euro-Canadians do so out of innocent ignorance, not maliciously. Certainly, just for one example, Roman Catholics and charismatic Christians like those at the Harvest City Church share vastly more in common theologically and would be much easier for members of another culture to confuse. As for political debate in Canada, I would have thought that regardless of one’s personal beliefs a certain level of theological and philosophical literacy, as well as the ability to read if not speak another language, do sums in one’s head, and understand the basic principles of the scientific method should all be part of a well-rounded education. Alas, the idea of a liberal education, in the best sense of the phrase, seems to have gone out of fashion. In this regard, our neoliberal masters are quite like the Communists they disparage, neither of them seeing much value in the arts or philosophical pursuits beyond their own narrow ideology.

      Reply
      • Bloozguy

        July 16th, 2015

        Wei Young, way wrong.

        Reply
  4. Sam Gunsch

    July 16th, 2015

    re: ‘talking point’ and Republican election tactics for voter turnout.

    ==============
    excerpt:

    Harper Conservatives crusading for evangelical votes

    By Stephen Maher July 15, 2015

    http://www.canada.com/news/national/Stephen+Maher+Harper+Conservatives+crusading+evangelical+votes/11217282/story.html

    excerpt:

    She and Harper are likely counting on the votes of the Harvest City Church congregation.

    Harper appears to have been influenced by Karl Rove, the strategist behind George W. Bush. Rove put a lot of energy into motivating evangelicals, who are reliable conservative voters, if you can get them to the polling station.

    Rove’s strategy — increase the turnout of reliable voters rather than building a broader coalition — seems to have influenced Harper, who doesn’t talk about this kind of thing, but can be observed handling issues important to evangelicals with great care and ignoring the concerns of people who won’t ever vote for him.

    This fall, he will need those evangelical voters, which means making sure they vote.

    One thing might make it a bit easier this fall. The Conservatives have amended the Elections Act to allow for an advance poll to be held on a Sunday for the first time.

    At noon on Thanksgiving Sunday, as services end in churches across Canada, polling stations will be opening — often right in the basement.

    Postmedia News

    Reply
    • David Climenhaga

      July 16th, 2015

      “And they asked him, saying, Is it lawful to steal votes on the sabbath days? that they might accuse him.” #CPCJesus

      Reply
  5. Anon

    July 16th, 2015

    Don’t the scriptures say that thou shalt not use the name of the Lord, thy God, in vain? Thus just to suggest that Jesus would have done the same thing as Dear Leader, would seem to many, that the Lord’s name had been used to troll for votes for CPCJesus Party. And that should have been viewed as a sin from the real Evangelicals, no? Or, do they really believe that using the name of the Lord to win an election is using it for the right (no pun intended) reasons? In which case, we may be justified in yelling “hypocrites”, as the real Jesus apparently once did at the Pharisees, I think.

    Reply
  6. ronmac

    July 16th, 2015

    Speaking of Jesus and the bible if you go back 2000 years there was probably an equivalent of Bill C-51 on the books. How else could the Ancient Rome maintain its control over half of the civilized world at the time? It needed the cooperation of local governors to keep a lid on things on the home front. Like Stephen Harper Pontius Pilate was a proxy ruler for Empire, keeping a eye on “terrorists” who could pose a challenge to the Imperial Rome and the legitimacy of the local authorities.

    I have a few observations of my own to add. Even though Jesus claimed that “my kingdom is not of this world,” he had no problems associating with tax collectors and the like, people who were generally despised and looked down upon at the time. So what can one conclude? Just this. Jesus was in favor of a strong central government and its role of stimulating the economy, setting standards like minumum wages, etc., ensuing the economic pie was fairly divided with plenty to go around (look at the miracle of the loaves and fish). IMHO

    Reply
    • ronmac

      July 16th, 2015

      Needless to say heaven will be filled with such good-natured souls in the afterlife there will be no need for government. So if you live your life as a committed socialist you will enter into an eternal paradise that is free from government regulations. Ironic, isn’t it?

      Reply
  7. Athabascan

    July 16th, 2015

    What would Jesus do?

    Would Jesus drop bombs on Syria?

    Would Jesus persecute Omar Khadr?

    I could go on, but you get the point.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)