Term limits on Alberta MLAs? ‘I think Jim Prentice is trying to lose… nothing else makes sense’

Posted on August 22, 2014, 1:34 am
8 mins

“A night to remember”: Jim Prentice explains to reporters how term limits for MLAs can work. Really! Below: The orchestra the Tories should have hired to play the lunchtime event.

There was no orchestra at Tory leadership candidate Jim Prentice’s lunchtime speech in Edmonton yesterday. But if there had been, it would have been playing “Nearer My God to Thee.”

Many of the journalists who turned up for what had been billed as a major event in a sustained Twitter fusillade in the hours before the microphones were turned on were persuaded Mr. Prentice was about to announce the acquisition of a high-profile candidate, possibly former Edmonton mayor Stephen Mandel.

The more cynical in their number joked that the Progressive Conservative establishment’s favourite in the race to replace the catastrophic Alison Redford as the province’s next permanent, full-time premier would be announcing he was going to hand out free steak knives to get people to take the free Tory memberships nobody seems to want.

So there was a palpable sense of disappointment when Mr. Prentice stepped to the microphone unaccompanied by Mr. Mandel or anyone else that looked like the sort of big-name star-power candidate the former federal cabinet minister, corporate lobbyist and bank executive was supposed to be able to attract to the moribund party’s banner.

Then Mr. Prentice began to work his way through his remarks, interminably describing the dismay, the frustration, the anger, the determination to restore public faith in the PC Government, that he personally has been feeling about the recent antics of the Redford Government. Eyes in the supportive crowd of about 80 souls grew glassy as he droned through three pages of this boilerplate.

Then he reached the point where he told us what he was going to do about it, to, as he put it, ensure the highest ethical standards and accountability: “There will be term limits. A limit of two terms for the premier and three terms for MLAs.”

I can’t speak for others, but this was the moment that I heard a faint creaking noise far below the waterline, and felt the slightest tremor through the deck of the unsinkable Tory Titanic that Mr. Prentice insisted he still hopes to captain, despite everything.

Say what? That’s unconstitutional. I mean, it’s really unconstitutional – unconstitutional enough to make the Redford Government’s recent foray into labour law look sober and cautious!

So that was the big news! Never mind the qualifiers (term limits will be grandfathered in, the limit clock only starts now) or the other promises (no holiday flights on government airplanes for anyone, ever, and a stern look at maybe selling them too, one day, yadda-yadda).

This was the plan of pure political genius that’s going to woo us angry Albertans all back to the Tory Mothership? Term limits!

People! How lame is that?

Notwithstanding the fact term limits are a bad idea – we the sovereign voters, thank you very much, will limit the PCs’ term in the traditional way, through the ballot box, to about 44 years – cooked up by disgruntled right-wing Americans to keep popular progressive politicians from using democracy to hang around the way Franklin Roosevelt did …

Never mind the fact this policy was apparently designed to woo back a sector of the electorate that’s long gone, and not to Saskatchewan – the wackiest fringe of the wackiest fringe of the Wildrose Party, whose leaders have never advocated this policy …

It’s simply not on.

The reason? It’s right there in black and white in the Constitution Act, 1982, Part 1, Section 3 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: “Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.”

Every citizen. Even those Jim Prentice thinks ought not to be allowed to ask voters nicely for a fourth term in office.

Note also that the Constitution Act, 1867 assures us we will have “a Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom.” And, by the way, that Section 33, the famed “Notwithstanding Clause” of our Charter, cannot be applied to Section 3, Democratic Rights, whether Jim Prentice or the Alberta Progressive Conservative Party feel like it or not.

This is a done deal. Term limits are simply not being placed on members of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta or any other Canadian province.

Good lord, how dumb do they think we are? That’s probably more complimentary than the other question we might consider asking under these circumstances, How dumb are they?

I was shaken out of thoughts like these when Mr. Prentice thundered: “We can take back our party, and we can set it right, my friends!” All around me, the room was full of many of the same Tory hacks we’ve seen at dozens of government functions over the past decade.

Moments later, Mr. Prentice backpedalled a little from the stern promise of his speech, telling reporters: “It can be done in terms of party policy. It could be a combination of the two.” True enough, I guess, and we all know how well that’s likely to work.

“It works in the States,” he also observed, a titch defensively. But this isn’t the States: we don’t have a constitutional right to bear arms and we do have a constitutional right to run for MLA as many times as the voters will elect us. Get used to it.

Even the other PC leadership candidates were gobsmacked by this brainstorm. As Thomas Lukaszuk told the Calgary Herald: “It defies tradition. It defies the law. It defies fundamental values of democracy. It’s just bizarre.”

It’s hard to disagree with that, but I’m going to give the last word tonight to Lou Arab, union organizer, New Democrat and inveterate Tweeter: I think @JimPrentice is trying to lose. Nothing else makes sense.”

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

12 Comments to: Term limits on Alberta MLAs? ‘I think Jim Prentice is trying to lose… nothing else makes sense’

  1. Edwin

    August 22nd, 2014

    The official language of Alberta shall henceforth be Swedish. Underwear will be checked every half hour. Underwear will be worn on the outside to make checking easier. Children under the age of 16 are now 16.

    Reply
    • pogo

      August 22nd, 2014

      Glad that the draft Julian Fantino for PM 2016 faction of the federal conservative party is finally weighing in on AB politics! Well done!

      Reply
  2. Joe

    August 22nd, 2014

    Bills 45 and 46 were constitutional and necessary for the continued success of Alberta.

    Reply
    • Athabascan

      August 22nd, 2014

      Excuse me?

      Bills 45 and 46 were ill-conceived ideas meant to appease ultra right wings who are sympathetic to the Wildrose party in an effort to lure them over to the Cons.

      Most MLAs had no clue what these Bills contained. Certainly, there was no emergency or viable economic reason to bring them up. These were the classic solutions to nonexistent problems and good examples of bad prioritizing from a bad government which at the time was led by Redford – a bad Premier..

      Reply
      • Brock E

        August 22nd, 2014

        Bills 45 and 46 take power away from large public sector unions and put it back where it belongs – in the hands of the people. I agree with Joe.

        Reply
        • Athabascan

          August 23rd, 2014

          Unions in Alberta represent the people. Ergo they are the people. Our government on the other hand represent the interests of the corporate elite and not rank and file workers.

          Reply
    • Anrold

      August 22nd, 2014

      Bills 45 & 46 are illegal.

      Reply
  3. jerrymacgp

    August 22nd, 2014

    Yet another bad political idea imported from the States, like “primaries”, which is essentially what the PC party leadership race has deteriorated into. I suppose, however, looking at it objectively, there could be one way to make such a concept constitutionally allowable, by limiting the number of times a person could run under a party banner. Nothing outside of his or her own mortality could stop him or her from running for a third or fourth or umpteenth term as an independent, but the voters would need to really want them to stick around if they were to get re-elected.

    Reply
  4. Expat Albertan

    August 22nd, 2014

    Well I suppose the Tories could make it work for their own: after three terms, you can no longer run under the PC banner (not that would EVER happen in a million years once they won the election, if they ever do). They will have nothing to say about how many terms MLAs from other parties can run, for the reasons that David pointed out.

    Reply
  5. Joe

    August 24th, 2014

    Bills 45 & 46 are the only good things the PCs have done the last few years. For all taxpayers.

    Reply
    • August 24th, 2014

      Joe:

      We’ve had this conversation before. If you keep saying the same thing over and over again, I’m going to stop publishing you comments again. No one will know but you and me, so what fun is that? It’s my blog and I can censor you if I feel like it, and all your whinges about free speech will be of no avail. So behave yourself, or it’s back to the doghouse with you.

      Dave

      Reply
    • Athabascan

      August 25th, 2014

      Done? What do you mean done? It was never implemented and never became law. What’s your definition of done?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)